Fish Growth vs Tank Size

Why wouldn't this be a reasonable idea?

The biggest issue I would have is the costs for the upgrades would be a prohibiting factor. Lots of "wasted" money on the smaller tanks when I would try to go straight to the largest possible.

The equipment used to setup the 20 would work OK for a time on the 40, but when going up to the 125 and then the 280 is going to be a lot of new equipment both times.

If your end goal is to end up with both a 125 and a 280 then this might not be such a bad option, but if the end goal is to have one 280 gallon tank, you are "wasting" a lot of cash to get there.

Selling off used equipment as you "outgrow" it can also work, but there are a lot of variables with that too.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

IF EVERY OPTION HELD ROUGHLY THE SAME NUMBER OF GALLONS, WHICH TANK SHAPE WOULD YOU CHOOSE?

  • Traditional rectangular

    Votes: 24 29.6%
  • Long and shallow

    Votes: 9 11.1%
  • Cube

    Votes: 7 8.6%
  • Peninsula

    Votes: 18 22.2%
  • Lagoon or extra-wide

    Votes: 13 16.0%
  • Tall display

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Dropoff

    Votes: 6 7.4%
  • Bowfront

    Votes: 1 1.2%
  • Hexagon

    Votes: 1 1.2%
  • Cylinder

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Fishbowl

    Votes: 1 1.2%
  • Something else (describe it in the comments)

    Votes: 1 1.2%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new