GFO or Chaeto

jmichaelh7

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 29, 2020
Messages
3,886
Reaction score
1,858
Location
Hanford ca
Rating - 50%
1   1   0
On my new tank I am wondering if I should run Chaeto with a Kessil , or put some gfo in a reactor?

The tank is new a month old just wondering what is simplest route to maintain extra nutrients
 

exnisstech

Grumpy old man
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2019
Messages
18,920
Reaction score
30,366
Location
Ashland Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
What are your reasons for either? Some people run chaeto fuges to help with nutrient reduction. I run fuges to provide a place for pods and other small life forms to live and reproduce. GFO is good for lowering Phosphates but you don't know if your going to even need to worry about that. Kind of putting the cart before the horse so to speak. Refugiums can be beneficial in almost any system but not necessary IMO. GFO has a specific purpose which is to reduce PO4 and often is never needed.
If you do run chaeto it does just fine under a cheap grow light if money is a factor.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,232
Reaction score
92,243
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Both can work to export phosphate. The chaeto also exports N. Each has pros and cons. Neither is perfect.

This is my general recommendation:


4. What targets seem reasonable? Of course, that depends on all the other factors at play, such as types of corals, availability of ammonia, particulate foods, etc. However, for a mature mixed reef, this would be how I personally would run it:
  • Let nitrate float between 5 ppm and 50 ppm. I’d use gentle export in this range, such as growing macroalgae.
  • Above 50 ppm, I’d begin to focus more on reducing it, by organic carbon dosing, turf or macroalgae, etc.
  • Below 5 ppm, I’d begin to dose ammonia or feed more. The target level might drop lower if dosing ammonia, just like the heavy in/heavy out scenario where nitrate may not be as needed.
  • Let phosphate float between about 0.06 ppm and 0.3 ppm. This range is higher than I’ve recommended in the past. I’d use gentle export in this range, such as growing macroalgae.
  • Above about 0.3 ppm, I’d begin to focus more on reducing it, by turf or macroalgae, or a binder such as GFO or lanthanum (has its own risks to tangs). If a binder: GO SLOW. Turf and macroalgae will typically be slow enough.
  • Below 0.06 ppm, I’d begin to dose sodium phosphate or feed more to get the level up.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.6%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 43 35.0%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.0%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.5%
Back
Top