Hanna Magnesium Checker return status

OP
OP
F

Fishingandreefing

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 7, 2019
Messages
3,660
Reaction score
1,819
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I received this email just this morning stating that they cross checked their new reagents against Salifert specifically and that they were "right in line with the Salifert kit".
Screenshot_20221018-205732_Gmail.jpg

Keep us posted. 50-125ppm may be within the error tolerances. Better than 300ppm high.
Good to hear. I would like to see what others have to say because keep doing the test it’s a pain and being busy lately.
 

mdb_talon

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 6, 2010
Messages
4,938
Reaction score
7,756
Location
Illinois
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hello from Hanna Instruments,

I am on the aquarium team, here to address the Magnesium Checker issue.

I am posting this same message on various threads regarding the Magnesium Checker so that as many people as possible get the information.

First, here is an FAQ with answers:

1) What happened?
As many of you know, Hanna Instruments prides itself in accuracy. We do extensive R&D before releasing products – what happened with the Magnesium Checker was a unique combination of unexpected factors. Our manufacturing facility is in Romania, and shipments from Eastern Europe were delayed in the Spring due to events in that area. With this, the initial batch of Magnesium products were in cargo storage for longer than anticipated. While the cargo containers sat for extended periods in the Spring, the temperature in the containers increased. This resulted in longer than usual exposure to higher than usual temperatures, which in turn caused one of the reagents to expire early. The products passed R&D inspection on site, and we’ve never had them degrade in transit before, which is why we were surprised about the issue at first. And why we are grateful that users like yourselves reported it!

2) What did Hanna do to fix the products?
The issue was one reagent expiring early during extended high-temperature exposure in the cargo containers. To fix this, we were able to greatly improve the temperature stability of this reagent by reformulating it from a liquid to a powder. This means that Reagent B is now a powder for this product. Our other Checkers have a timer built in for the dissolution of the powder reagent, so we added that to the new Magnesium Checkers too. That is the only difference in devices, but because of that, we are sending everyone who purchased the initial version a new Checker with the timer built in!

3) Why has it taken so long?
Resolving this issue took several steps. First we had to reformulate Reagent B into a powder. Then we had to add the timer into the production process for the Checkers. Once those updates were made, we had to repackage all the previously produced items with the updated ones. And of course, we had to figure out the logistics of replacing these items both for customers such as yourselves, and bulk purchasers like LFSs and major websites. We also found new transport options to avoid extended international shipping delays in the future.

4) How is Hanna going to make this right for the people who already purchased?
We will send everyone who fills out this form: HI783 Marine Checker Reagent Issue Form free replacements for whatever Magnesium items (Checker and/or Extra Reagent Packages) were purchased. Please fill out all fields!

5) How do I know if I am in queue for the replacements after submitting the above form?
I receive all the form submissions. My apologies that there is not a confirmation, but once you hit submit I do receive it. We are on track to have all current form submissions fulfilled by the end of October, and new submissions as soon as possible thereafter.

Please see our official customer letter below for more details:

1664901872866.png



These Magnesium items will be available again from your LFS and online sources soon.
Thank you for your patience as we have resolved this issue!


All the Best,
Hanna Instruments


I am curious is this experience is going to change the way you guys replied to so many who knew there checker was junk and were told it was fine for so long? A test against a colored vial is in no way an adequate test to basically say "the checker works fine you just don't know what you are doing" and then send it back. If tests were done using the actual reagents you supplied the rest of us rather than a colored vial maybe the issue would have been found much sooner.

Also maybe on the alk checker reagent put a warning that once opened it's shelf life is very short and may be extended by refrigeration or something....
 

Jimbo662

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 1, 2013
Messages
4,749
Reaction score
2,147
Location
Austin, Tx
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I got mine yesterday. I tested against Salifert. Sal - 1425, Hanna 1415. Several weeks ago I had a sample tested by my LFS who also uses Salifert. His result was about 5 pts different from my test kit.
 

Scp

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
207
Reaction score
47
Location
Waterford
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I’m bummin too because I am a big fan of Hannah checkers. But when I saw reefers reporting mag numbers of 1600-1700 it became obvious this checker was not up to the standards we’ve grown accustomed to.
I have several tanks and my testing results came back between 1550-1675 . After watching a good video on youtube, I realized there was an error in the way I tested. Going to retest tonight. See what happens..
 
OP
OP
F

Fishingandreefing

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 7, 2019
Messages
3,660
Reaction score
1,819
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I got mine yesterday. I tested against Salifert. Sal - 1425, Hanna 1415. Several weeks ago I had a sample tested by my LFS who also uses Salifert. His result was about 5 pts different from my test kit.
That’s pretty good. A couple of tests I did compared with the salifert, it’s being always about 20-50 higher for the Hanna.
 
OP
OP
F

Fishingandreefing

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 7, 2019
Messages
3,660
Reaction score
1,819
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have several tanks and my testing results came back between 1550-1675 . After watching a good video on youtube, I realized there was an error in the way I tested. Going to retest tonight. See what happens..
What did you do wrong if you can share
 

Creating a strong bulwark: Did you consider floor support for your reef tank?

  • I put a major focus on floor support.

    Votes: 54 40.0%
  • I put minimal focus on floor support.

    Votes: 28 20.7%
  • I put no focus on floor support.

    Votes: 48 35.6%
  • Other.

    Votes: 5 3.7%
Back
Top