- Joined
- Dec 4, 2018
- Messages
- 379
- Reaction score
- 299
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I respectfully disagree. The environmentalist whackos have been trying to shut down the fishery for a long time. This just gave them a little more ammo in court. Banning an entire industry because of a couple law breakers is ridiculous. We don't ban cars because of drunk drivers or people driving without a license. Understand who these people (environmentalists) are. They believe keeping anything in captivity is morally wrong. And it would be wise to fight them at every opportunity because they'll be looking to shut down the entire industry, not just Hawaii.I think captive breeding programs are the reason Hawaii is going that route. Yellow tangs are a possibility through Biota and other captive breeders. You can thank the people on the Hawaiian islands that actively break the laws and illegally fish for the current ban and views on the aquarium trade there.
Hawaii County man arrested for illegal catch of aquarium fish
Officers spotted a vessel in the West Hawaii Regional Fisheries Management Area off South point and discovered 333 Yellow Tang and three Pakuikui (Achilles tang).www.hawaiinewsnow.com
Kona men cited for illegal aquarium fish, gear
<p>Two Kona men were cited Thursday for illegal harvesting of aquarium fish offshore of Kawaihae, the Department of Land and Natural Resources announced Friday afternoon.</p>www.hawaiitribune-herald.com
I under stand your point but the reason for the ban is not to preserve food.. at least that’s not what I have seen.Food and “to look at” is different. If my kids need food I’ll eat it. If it’s fir fun Someone should have a moral obligation to make sure it’s sustainable.
I’m suprised you just compared food and hobby. You have obviously never worried about food. (Hahaha neither have I, but at least I know there’s a difference)
Agreed it's not solely based on that, those incidents are not far and few between either. Like you said it just put a bad light on the industry.I respectfully disagree. The environmentalist whackos have been trying to shut down the fishery for a long time. This just gave them a little more ammo in court. Banning an entire industry because of a couple law breakers is ridiculous. We don't ban cars because of drunk drivers or people driving without a license. Understand who these people (environmentalists) are. They believe keeping anything in captivity is morally wrong. And it would be wise to fight them at every opportunity because they'll be looking to shut down the entire industry, not just Hawaii.
I guess I'm a glass-half-empty kind of guy because I have long thought that these kinds of bans were inevitable. Hawaii first, others to follow. The ornamental fish industry is an easy target with much less organized advocacy. Hard to see how farming and the cruise ship business (well, before 2020) doesn't do far more damage .... not to mention weather events.Despite everything being in the works, never thought this day would come. Until we get enough Captive Bred specimens, goodbye Yellow Tangs, Kole Tangs, Convict Tangs, Lavender Tangs, Achilles, and many others.
I wonder what would be the future of Tangs for Zebrasoma and other fish.
What would be good alternatives for most people in the now indefinite absence of the Yellow Tang?
I respectfully disagree. The environmentalist whackos have been trying to shut down this fishery for a long time. The two incidents cited above only provided more ammo in court. But to shut down an entire industry because of a couple law breakers makes as much sense as banning cars because of drunk drivers. It has nothing to do with illegal fishing. These people (environmentalists) believe that keeping fish/inverts in captivity is cruel. Therefore, everyone else must subscribe to their thinking and morality. If you like and enjoy this hobby/industry, I suggest you fight these people at every turn. Hawaii is just the first battle. They intend to have the entire industry banned worldwide.I think captive breeding programs are the reason Hawaii is going that route. Yellow tangs are a possibility through Biota and other captive breeders. You can thank the people on the Hawaiian islands that actively break the laws and illegally fish for the current ban and views on the aquarium trade there.
Hawaii County man arrested for illegal catch of aquarium fish
Officers spotted a vessel in the West Hawaii Regional Fisheries Management Area off South point and discovered 333 Yellow Tang and three Pakuikui (Achilles tang).www.hawaiinewsnow.com
Kona men cited for illegal aquarium fish, gear
<p>Two Kona men were cited Thursday for illegal harvesting of aquarium fish offshore of Kawaihae, the Department of Land and Natural Resources announced Friday afternoon.</p>www.hawaiitribune-herald.com
Sadly, this will result in more demand for fish collected from less well managed fisheries. While it might marginally improve fish populations in Hawaii, it has the potential to cause significant damage to these less well managed fisheries.Christmas Islands are still open and will offer many Hawaiian Fish. Truth be told Hawaii had one of the most well managed fisheries in the world. There was 0 reason to shut down collection other than crazy nuts. This is coming from someone who has an ecology degree.
While getting my degree professors presented me with Hawaii as an example of the most well managed and maintained fishery in the world.
The fundamental misunderstanding about coral reefs is that they are space limited. The greatest threats to reefs are ones that limit the amount of habitable space. In Hawaii this is primarily agricultural run off. Unfortunately the aquarium trade is a more appealing target than farmers.
Anyone who does not understand that limiting space is the greatest threat to reefs does not have a basic understanding of reef ecology. In a space limited ecosystem it is very easy to harvest animals because as soon as they are removed more space is available to the ecosystem and it gets filled quickly. Removing habitable space from a reef is like removing water from a desert.
Thing is, they aren't. You, or I, might disagree with their position, but labelling them as whackos means it's much harder to engage in any kind of constructive dialog.environmentalist whackos
That's probably true. Of course, given the deplorable survival rate of collected fish (10% .... maybe) it's hard to argue against 'their' view either compellingly or ethically.They intend to have the entire industry banned worldwide.
This is some really solid information - thank you.Frankly, the people here saying that the science is on their side when it comes to this issue are objectively incorrect. You don't get denied by the state Senate, state House, and unanimously rejected in your appeal by the Hawai'i Supreme Court and Hawaii’s Environmental Council without strong evidence that mismanagement is occurring, especially when you are on the side of the industry.
The fact is that most of the wild fish captured for aquariums are herbivorous reef-dwellers that coral reef ecosystems depend upon because they control algae growth that smothers corals. Studies have shown that reducing reef fish and shellfish diversity impairs a reef’s ability to respond to stresses or disturbances. Minimizing such impacts is vitally important as climate change and ocean warming and acidification threaten reefs.
I'm a doctoral student, so I've read a lot of scientific papers. The ones that people cite in opposition to this action are deeply flawed and rely on evidence with little no to external validation. I can clarify on this if desired. The fact is: The Yellow Tang population nearly doubled within four years of area closures in West Hawaii. Since these fish eat algae that otherwise smothers the reefs, this is a vital statistic.
For those saying Hawaii's system is well managed, that is also incorrect. It is better than systems in much of the rest of the Pacific, but that is saying almost nothing. Prior to the ban, Hawaii had the following system:
TL;DR: This ban is beneficial, scientifically sound, and unanimously agreed on by legislative and judicial bodies who are not predisposed to be kind to the environmental movement.
- To get a fish collecting permit, you just need to fill out an online application on the Hawaii Department of Land & Natural Resources (DLNR) website. The permit costs $50, and everyone is eligible. The DLNR has not placed any limits on the number of permits issued each year.
- The DLNR does not properly monitor reef collection areas for illegal activity. There are only three or four officers for the entire West Hawaii coastline and they must take care of land and sea conservation issues.
- Hawaii has a volunteer report system. So someone could be taking 5,000 fish a day, and reporting that they caught 73. And there's really no enforcement of that.
- Based on these stats, it's estimated that the number of fish reported is an underestimate of 2-5 times. So if they report 500,000 caught, the actual number is 1-2.5 million.
To say that the entire practice was banned due to a few bad actors is a wholly erroneous statement.I respectfully disagree. The environmentalist whackos have been trying to shut down this fishery for a long time. The two incidents cited above only provided more ammo in court. But to shut down an entire industry because of a couple law breakers makes as much sense as banning cars because of drunk drivers. It has nothing to do with illegal fishing. These people (environmentalists) believe that keeping fish/inverts in captivity is cruel. Therefore, everyone else must subscribe to their thinking and morality. If you like and enjoy this hobby/industry, I suggest you fight these people at every turn. Hawaii is just the first battle. They intend to have the entire industry banned worldwide.
I think what most people will agree is that fish & coral taken for our hobby contributes a drop in the bucket compared the damage from the Ag business.I have over 1000 logged dives in more than a dozen countries and have been in every ocean. Outside of Puerto Rico Hawaii had some of the worst reefs I have seen. Not all were bad though. Molikini in Maui was gorgeous. The attached photo is from Qamea, a small Island in Fiji. This is what a shallow hard coral reef should look like. None of my dives in Fiji were really in more than 30 feet of water.
The situation in Hawaii is bad.