High PO4 it's really viable?

reeffing

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 8, 2019
Messages
2
Reaction score
20
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi all,

I would like to know if someone have high Po4 (like 1.4 to 1.8) with some SPS.

I try to explain what I mean,
Just a litte time ago I see a Richard ross video's about the higher PO4 in the slatwater tank.

do someone use this type of method?

thaks a lof for the answers guys!
 

nautical_nathaniel

Indecision may or may not be my problem.
View Badges
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
4,881
Reaction score
12,086
Location
West Palm Beach, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I doubt it would be deadly to the corals but it does prohibit growth through some complex chemistry-based reasons. You would also probably not get good coloration from your SPS and would always be at risk for algae issues.
 

jda

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
14,342
Reaction score
21,756
Location
Boulder, CO
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It is possible, but you will be limited by what you can keep. This will be death for lots of acropora, but some will do fine and grow for you. Ross tank is no different... he has only the corals that will live in such conditions, not a full spread of acros that will grow in any tank. BTW - Ross is down to like .5 P now.
 

Gregg @ ADP

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
1,675
Reaction score
3,881
Location
Chicago
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As easy as it is to keep PO4- <0.1, I’m not sure why anybody would want to have it above that...or much above it, anyway....(ie I wouldn’t have to be talked off a ledge for having 0.3 PO4).

PO4- will bind with Ca+ at higher levels, although I’m not sure that it’s really been determined what the level is. In the human body, PO4- in the bloodstream becomes a problem at ~45-50ppm. But in a much simpler organism such as an acropora, I could see PO4- ‘outcompeting’ the coral for available Ca+ even at fairly low level, and slowing/stunting the growth.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.3%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 34.2%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.5%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 10 8.3%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.7%
Back
Top