Aside from lighting, I believe the most expensive part of owning a large aquarium is circulation! The concept is so simple. An under water fan. That's it! Propellers that push water. . . How hard can it be... Yet, it seems so difficult!
In three years time, I've had two MP40s ($450 each), two Corded Skimz S18 ($130 each) powerheads, and 1 Maxspect XF 350 die or malfunction on me!
I've replaced the two older MP40s with Mobius enabled MP40s, meh, not a great improvement. I replaced the Skimz with two Gyre XF 350s, which I have a new motor block coming as a warranty replacement for one of the two.
With the two operational MP40s, if they were ran at max - up to 5,200 gph each. The gyres are rated around 5,000 gph each. That puts me at 20k gph flow at max.
My tank is 70" long, by 3 feet wide, by 31" tall. I have the two gyres mounted next to each other on one end at the surface to create surface tension and flow loops with the two mp 40s pushing back to front.
I am thinking two more gyres on the opposite side so water is pushed either in opposite intermittent frequencies to create a wave like effect. With two Maxspect 280s, that would add another 12k in flow. For a total of up to 32k plus 2k from my return pump for 34k max circulation.
The tank is 350 gallon, with 75 gallon sump. Is 10 X turnover of the display size still the circulation / flow to shoot for?
If it is, I'll have spent $3,000 to get my flow up to speed, and continue to have high maintenance of all the pumps. Just seems like a lot of in tank hardware. I can see why using a closed loop with a return pump would be almost cheaper. . . Is this normal to spend this much on circulation alone?
Or is there a more economical way I'm not aware of?
In three years time, I've had two MP40s ($450 each), two Corded Skimz S18 ($130 each) powerheads, and 1 Maxspect XF 350 die or malfunction on me!
I've replaced the two older MP40s with Mobius enabled MP40s, meh, not a great improvement. I replaced the Skimz with two Gyre XF 350s, which I have a new motor block coming as a warranty replacement for one of the two.
With the two operational MP40s, if they were ran at max - up to 5,200 gph each. The gyres are rated around 5,000 gph each. That puts me at 20k gph flow at max.
My tank is 70" long, by 3 feet wide, by 31" tall. I have the two gyres mounted next to each other on one end at the surface to create surface tension and flow loops with the two mp 40s pushing back to front.
I am thinking two more gyres on the opposite side so water is pushed either in opposite intermittent frequencies to create a wave like effect. With two Maxspect 280s, that would add another 12k in flow. For a total of up to 32k plus 2k from my return pump for 34k max circulation.
The tank is 350 gallon, with 75 gallon sump. Is 10 X turnover of the display size still the circulation / flow to shoot for?
If it is, I'll have spent $3,000 to get my flow up to speed, and continue to have high maintenance of all the pumps. Just seems like a lot of in tank hardware. I can see why using a closed loop with a return pump would be almost cheaper. . . Is this normal to spend this much on circulation alone?
Or is there a more economical way I'm not aware of?