How to source Chromium, Fluorine, and Selenium

Lousybreed

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
822
Reaction score
648
Location
Sussex, WI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am zeroing in on my DIY trace element potion.....Does anyone have any tips on how to best buy Chromium, Fluorine, and Selenium. I am kinda striking out on finding actual chemical sources......I have found supplements but I want to avoid buying supplements because I don't know what additional things are in them.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
66,543
Reaction score
62,838
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
66,543
Reaction score
62,838
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Edit: out of an adundance of caution for aquarist safety from mishandling, I removed this recommendation. See other choices later in the thread.
 
Last edited:

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
66,543
Reaction score
62,838
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

flampton

Ecological Reefing
View Badges
Joined
Aug 2, 2020
Messages
1,197
Reaction score
5,035
Location
Flagstaff, AZ
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes in fact I wouldn't get the chromium at all without having a chemical hood. It's really really dangerous.

If you can source some trivalent chromium that would be much much safer and better for your tank.. Like CrCl3

So even though trivalent chromium isn't the main chromium in seawater it's the biologically useful one, as chromium (VI) has no biological function and in fact it's just straight up toxic to life.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
66,543
Reaction score
62,838
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes in fact I wouldn't get the chromium at all without having a chemical hood. It's really really dangerous.

If you can source some trivalent chromium that would be much much safer and better for your tank.. Like CrCl3

So even though trivalent chromium isn't the main chromium in seawater it's the biologically useful one, as chromium (VI) has no biological function and in fact it's just straight up toxic to life.

I presume one is dosing to not more than natural levels, so I do not think it will matter if he doses the form I suggested, and they will itnerconvert. I agree safety is a concern for using it.

That said:


"Cr(VI) is much more bioavailable to aquatic organisms than Cr(III)"

"Dissolved Cr(III) has a strong tendency to adsorb to surfaces (Cranston and Murray 1978) and is characterized by a low solubility. "

"Cr(VI) forms anionic oxy-compounds that also have an adsorption affinity for certain proton-specific mineral surfaces (Zachara et al. 1987). However, their adsorption is limited in sea water where both Cr(VI) species and particle surfaces have negative charges, and high concentrations of sulfate (0.028 M) compete with chromate for adsorption sites. "
 
Last edited:

flampton

Ecological Reefing
View Badges
Joined
Aug 2, 2020
Messages
1,197
Reaction score
5,035
Location
Flagstaff, AZ
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It's more bioavailable to be toxic as it has no biological function. It causes lung cancer, other cancers, sterility, eye damage, skin damage, allergic reactions and if inhaled serious respiratory burns and potential death.. So I'm not really concerned about toxicity and fish here, however...

MSDS

Btw
Same abstract...
The competition between Cr(VI) and sulfate is responsible for significant changes in the bioavailability and toxicity of Cr(VI) in estuarine waters where sulfate concentrations increase markedly with salinity (Riedel 1984; Riedel 1985) Cr(VI) compounds are toxic due to their oxidation of intracellular compounds and are also known as a human carcinogen and mutagen.

So sulfate will help control the toxicity in a marine aquarium because it competes with Cr(VI) for uptake, but only up to a point (the two reidel papers) however what's to help the person working with a chemical that can seriously harm them, doesn't likely have a fume hood, eyewash station, other ppe?
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
66,543
Reaction score
62,838
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It's more bioavailable to be toxic as it has no biological function.

Seasonal changes in speciation of dissolved chromium in the surface Sargasso Sea

"Although Cr (VI) is toxic to phytoplankton in freshwater systems, the toxicity in seawater (up to a concentration of 1.9 umol l1 ) is negligible (Frey et al., 1983); thus the uptake of Cr (VI) by phytoplankton and its subsequent reduction to the less-toxic Cr (III) is not thought to be a detoxification mechanism (Bopp and Ehrlich, 1988). A more likely explanation for the reduction process is that phytoplankton are able to use Cr (VI) as an electron acceptor in some cellular chemical reactions (Lovley, 1993)."
 

flampton

Ecological Reefing
View Badges
Joined
Aug 2, 2020
Messages
1,197
Reaction score
5,035
Location
Flagstaff, AZ
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don't know what you're trying to win here? I mean you realize you're battling for the OP to get a extremely dangerous oxidizer for no known positives? Besides the known massive health risks, what if he stores it next to his rubbing alcohol and newspapers? I mean in a modern laboratory this compound is stored with extreme caution, only used in a hood with extreme caution, and every little bit of waste product is stored for chemical safety to remove and dispose of properly.

so to continue with the chromium(VI) not being important to your aquarium...

Yes phytoplankton can detoxify it by photoreduction as outlined in this paper from 2009. But so what. If I lived where there was a decent amount of Cr(VI) I would want to be able to detoxify it too.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113609000245?via=ihub

Light irradiation was essential to drive the reduction of Cr(VI) by marine phytoplankton, because Cr(VI) is thermodynamically stable in the presence of oxygen, its reduction in aerobic environment is an endergonic process, requiring investment of energy from an external source. To our knowledge, this was the first time that marine phytoplankton itself could achieve the photoreduction of Cr(VI) was confirmed.

_____

Now that purported enzyme thing that one group made up well that comes from....

The author Lovely (1993) who was working on Desulfovibrio vulgaris (a anaerobic bacterium) and found that it utilizes cytochrome c3 in concert with H2 to reduce chromium. Which helps the cell detoxify it, just like our cytochromes can help detoxify things.- This was then wrongly extrapolated to suggest phytoplankton does something similar. The key to remember is this is going to be a energy dependent process to reduce the chromium in a oxidizing environment. It is not something that is helping the cell other than detoxifying the chromium (VI). You want it gone, it is a strong oxidizer!!! And as for D. vulgaris well it has an easier time reducing chromium (VI) because it is living in a anaerobic environment (a reducing environment.)

Oh and I had thought science had gotten a bit further but it turns out in reality we only think so far that chromium(III) is important for humans and other mammals, and this science is disputed. Which means chromium(III) effects are not even slightly understood in other organismal groups.

So I change my opinion and say don't bother with chromium at all, it's likely going to do nothing positive. And I think you'll find this with a lot of the other constiuents of seawater being of no importance to the general health of an aquarium.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
66,543
Reaction score
62,838
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don't know what you're trying to win here?

I'm not trying to win anything. I'm correcting false statements that you make.

You may well be right that Cr(III) is a better form to dose. Or maybe not.

I agree it is potentially safer for the user.

But claiming organisms do not use Cr(IV) is not the way to convince me.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
66,543
Reaction score
62,838
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
. And I think you'll find this with a lot of the other constiuents of seawater being of no importance to the general health of an aquarium.

I certainly agree with that. Getting people to dose things like lithium and barium just because the tank water does not match seawater by ICP is causing more angst than benefit, IMO.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
66,543
Reaction score
62,838
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am zeroing in on my DIY trace element potion.....Does anyone have any tips on how to best buy Chromium, Fluorine, and Selenium. I am kinda striking out on finding actual chemical sources......I have found supplements but I want to avoid buying supplements because I don't know what additional things are in them.

If you want to go with a chromium 3 form for safety reasons, these may be good choices:


 

flampton

Ecological Reefing
View Badges
Joined
Aug 2, 2020
Messages
1,197
Reaction score
5,035
Location
Flagstaff, AZ
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
What false statements did I make? I think we maybe are going by different definitions? For me biological functions are those essential to maintain health of an organism, this was unclear so I do apologize. I probably should have said that they're not essential to the health of the organisms but sometimes chromium (VI) can be metabolically altered by them.

E.g. Organisms like D. vulgaris can reduce elements like chromium (VI) and Uranium (VI). Yet the only benefit they get is not to deal with the toxins in their environment anymore. Same with the phytoplankton and using photoreduction. Some seem to be able to use these metals as electron acceptors, but it's more of a double shot, they get reduction (detoxification) and a bit of energy. Yet none of these organisms that I can find are exclusive to anyone metal, and usually only use these metals when they don't have enough of their primary reductant available, sulfate, nitrate etc... This is likely very important for their niche, so it could be thought of as similar to our liver and the detoxification of various metabolites.

And one more thing. If I didn't think it was risky to handle the compound outside a laboratory I'd say if you want to do it then do it, I'll just disagree to it's benefits. Basically throw in your chromium, barium, lithium, rubidium, thallium, uranium,. etc... :D

Oh and the Synechococcus growth medium (picophytoplankton) that I have been using has chromium (III) nitrate. So that might be another shot.

And yes I put that in the medium because they call for it, I'm not sure it does anything????
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
66,543
Reaction score
62,838
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don’t see any use in debating the meaning of words like “biological role”.

I do not have reason to believe that any form of chromium is actually useful to dose, nor do I know which form might be more useful if you did dose it. I recommended the dominant natural form in seawater, and I doubt there is any problem if it is maintained at natural seawater levels. I do agree it requires more care in handling and one might chose a different form for that reason.
 
OP
OP
Lousybreed

Lousybreed

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
822
Reaction score
648
Location
Sussex, WI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Wow! I am going to digest this thread, I really appreciate the conversation, and I will respond shortly.
 
OP
OP
Lousybreed

Lousybreed

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
822
Reaction score
648
Location
Sussex, WI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Guys, I am note going to add chrome, nor the sodium flouride most likely. I do appreciate the discussion as this has helped me tremendously. I am glad that Randy pointed me in a good route for selenium! That helped out nicely!
 
OP
OP
Lousybreed

Lousybreed

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
822
Reaction score
648
Location
Sussex, WI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
And last question gents....potassium iodide.....would you recommend this salt to supply iodine to the aquarium?
 

Mastering the art of locking and unlocking water pathways: What type of valves do you have on your aquarium plumbing?

  • Ball valves.

    Votes: 37 54.4%
  • Gate valves.

    Votes: 37 54.4%
  • Check valves.

    Votes: 15 22.1%
  • None.

    Votes: 15 22.1%
  • Other.

    Votes: 6 8.8%

New Posts

Back
Top