I need (a second) math geek! Challenge for you

toothybugs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
121
Reaction score
97
Location
Minneapolis area
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a fairly concentrated solution of sodium nitrate, and to manipulate the Redfield in my favor and partner with GFO, I would like to use it for nitrate dosing to help reduce PO4 in my struggling SPS-dom system (I measured PO4 at 0.5ppm the other day). But I would really like someone to confirm my numbers.

First, I took 50.0mL of solution and found it weighed 67.7g, or 1.354g/mL. I wanted to know the molarity or molality of such a solution so I could get a better ppm calculation.

Using this paper (https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwjVy7yv3PLMAhVCJR4KHTotCrMQFggcMAA&url=http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/v72-454&usg=AFQjCNF45zFJLLZu-0rWUZlLv82yK1FUHQ&cad=rja) and the densities and concentrations listed therein, I established a curve and found my solution to be approximately 7.07M. Given the mass of NO3 and NaNO3, I figure for my est'd 105 gallons of actual water, I need 3.5mL of my solution to adjust my system NO3 concentration by ~1ppm.

Am I right?
 
Last edited:

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,269
Reaction score
92,322
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
How did you have a nitrate solution that you did not know the concentration?

Yes, the 7 M part is roughly correct.

7M has 7 x 62 g/L = 434 g nitrate per L, or 434 mg/mL.

To boost 105 gallons (397 L) by 1 mg/L you need 397 L x 1 mg/L = 397 mg.

So just about 0.9 mL into your tank water would give ~ 1 mg/L. :)
 

JimWelsh

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,548
Reaction score
1,645
Location
Angwin, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a fairly concentrated solution of sodium nitrate, and to manipulate the Redfield in my favor and partner with GFO, I would like to use it for nitrate dosing to help reduce PO4 in my struggling SPS-dom system (I measured PO4 at 0.5ppm the other day). But I would really like someone to confirm my numbers.

First, I took 50.0mL of solution and found it weighed 67.7g, or 1.354g/mL. I wanted to know the molarity or molality of such a solution so I could get a better ppm calculation.

Using this paper (https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwjVy7yv3PLMAhVCJR4KHTotCrMQFggcMAA&url=http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/v72-454&usg=AFQjCNF45zFJLLZu-0rWUZlLv82yK1FUHQ&cad=rja) and the densities and concentrations listed therein, I established a curve and found my solution to be approximately 7.07M. Given the mass of NO3 and NaNO3, I figure for my est'd 105 gallons of actual water, I need 3.5mL of my solution to adjust my system NO3 concentration by ~1ppm.

Am I right?
Nice work on the density / concentration curve. What order polynomial did you use?
 

tupes

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 22, 2012
Messages
1,796
Reaction score
2,059
Location
United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
:eek: :confused: :confused: it's good to know we have smart people like these on the forum. Never knew it. Thanks for being a part of this to help folks out. Now I'm going take an advil after reading those equations.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
toothybugs

toothybugs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
121
Reaction score
97
Location
Minneapolis area
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Jim - I considered linear between the two surrounding points for simplicity in the determination but being a glutton for brain puzzles I opted for a 2nd order polynomial system, figuring the curve had to peak at some point (technically a horizontal asymptote, I guess) and we'd model the left side of it. I thought using a logarithmic curve would have been hellacious to work backward. In hindsight that may have been acceptable over the range of study as well.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 38 27.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 47 33.6%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 31 22.1%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 14 10.0%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.1%
Back
Top