I feel you appropriately captured why "Darwinism" was used.Today - "Darwinism" is often used by opponent of the concept of evolution in a derogatory manner in order to insinuate that it is an "ism" (believe) and not science. Scientist very seldom use it.
Modern medicines and methods can explain why expected life time (with is calculated by a average - not median) have rise among certain populations (among those that can afford them) because infant mortality tends to decrease very much among these populations.
I hope it is okay if I respectfully disagree with the use of 'average' for life expectancy. When doing survival analysis on non-normal, highly skewed distributions, you use the median and not the mean because the mean is greatly influenced by the skew, in the case of life expectancy, that is the infant mortality numbers. You will find that means are used to simplify the explanation. In addition to the skew, the use of the median is even more important when looking at samples vs true populations (knowing every case).
Not trying to be argumentative. It is a common thing that happens. People in my field who have to use the information for high-value predictions always debate with the marketing people about accurately communicating what is happening versus making it easier to understand. I'm a huge believer in educating people, which is why I always took the time to explain these types of things.
