Inconsistent nitrate test results lately

Ryan15236

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
413
Reaction score
160
Location
Kingsport, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Looking for some insight on some inconsistent nitrate readings I have gotten lately.

Tank is 15 months old. 180 gallon mixed reef. Stocking D. Sailfin tang, Hippo tang, convict tang, purple tang, foxface, CBB, longnose Hawk, melanarus wrasse. Went thru ugly stages seemed to last forever. Still lingering cyanobacteria in some places. During ugly stages just focused on manual removal until tank started stabilizing. I have been getting results for about 2 months of 20-25 ppm. 2.5 weeks ago I tested and results showed 41ppm so did 20G WC and test results after showed 23ppm (10/18). After that WC I started focusing on changed filter socks more often. I run two filter socks on my trigger sump and I will change out the sock closest to water inlet into sump when overflowing (roughly every 3 days) and then move the other sock up a slot into that socks previously slot and new sock replaces the sock I just moved up slots. So changing out 1 sock every 3 days. Have not done water change since 10/18 so I test yesterday and got 0.4 ppm so I added 1 ML of sodium nitrate solution (50G dissolved in 480 ml RODI water) just to prevent zero. so I retested this morning 10/28 and got a maxed out 75PPM then retested again and got 3.7PPM. Yesterday I used about a tube of JB waterweld placing about 15 corals. Could this be messing with results? Also I am testing from sump return which is also where ATO water goes. Could this water be interfering with results? I do not pull sample when ATO is running. The 3.7 PPM result sample I pulled from refugium. Testing is done with Hanna Checker Nitrate HR.
 

BryanM

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 27, 2024
Messages
7,651
Reaction score
9,361
Location
Morgan Hill
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
With that much inconsistency I wonder if you've got a bad batch of reagents.

I've personally been the recipient of one bad batch about 6 months or so ago, though they all tested very low, didn't bounce around.

I don't think JB Weld is the issue.
 
OP
OP
Ryan15236

Ryan15236

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
413
Reaction score
160
Location
Kingsport, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
With that much inconsistency I wonder if you've got a bad batch of reagents.

I've personally been the recipient of one bad batch about 6 months or so ago, though they all tested very low, didn't bounce around.

I don't think JB Weld is the issue.
Not sure how often that happens but this is a new batch of reagent. I ordered this batch 10/14. Probably had a couple of my old left but definitely been using this new batch during the last 4 tests
 
OP
OP
Ryan15236

Ryan15236

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
413
Reaction score
160
Location
Kingsport, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
With that much inconsistency I wonder if you've got a bad batch of reagents.

I've personally been the recipient of one bad batch about 6 months or so ago, though they all tested very low, didn't bounce around.

I don't think JB Weld is the issue.
The blinking 75 ppm test blew my mind. When I added Reagent to sample it almost instantly turned a dark red
 

Dan_P

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
9,785
Reaction score
9,637
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Looking for some insight on some inconsistent nitrate readings I have gotten lately.

Tank is 15 months old. 180 gallon mixed reef. Stocking D. Sailfin tang, Hippo tang, convict tang, purple tang, foxface, CBB, longnose Hawk, melanarus wrasse. Went thru ugly stages seemed to last forever. Still lingering cyanobacteria in some places. During ugly stages just focused on manual removal until tank started stabilizing. I have been getting results for about 2 months of 20-25 ppm. 2.5 weeks ago I tested and results showed 41ppm so did 20G WC and test results after showed 23ppm (10/18). After that WC I started focusing on changed filter socks more often. I run two filter socks on my trigger sump and I will change out the sock closest to water inlet into sump when overflowing (roughly every 3 days) and then move the other sock up a slot into that socks previously slot and new sock replaces the sock I just moved up slots. So changing out 1 sock every 3 days. Have not done water change since 10/18 so I test yesterday and got 0.4 ppm so I added 1 ML of sodium nitrate solution (50G dissolved in 480 ml RODI water) just to prevent zero. so I retested this morning 10/28 and got a maxed out 75PPM then retested again and got 3.7PPM. Yesterday I used about a tube of JB waterweld placing about 15 corals. Could this be messing with results? Also I am testing from sump return which is also where ATO water goes. Could this water be interfering with results? I do not pull sample when ATO is running. The 3.7 PPM result sample I pulled from refugium. Testing is done with Hanna Checker Nitrate HR.

Since the nitrate test results were incorrect after the water change, something is up with the nitrate test. If the test was performed with the same lot of chemical, I would tend to think it was a bad lot.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,232
Reaction score
92,243
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You might try taking a bucket of tank water, measure nitrate, add a fixed amount, then measure again and see if the values are reasonable.

Also, are you certain the dosed chemical was sodium nitrate and not sodium nitrite?
 
OP
OP
Ryan15236

Ryan15236

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
413
Reaction score
160
Location
Kingsport, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You might try taking a bucket of tank water, measure nitrate, add a fixed amount, then measure again and see if the values are reasonable.

Also, are you certain the dosed chemical was sodium nitrate and not sodium nitrite?
Good idea. I will keep you updated if I do this. I’m going to retest this evening or tomorrow and get sample from refugium again and see if this gets similar results as the 3.7 ppm from this morning

One sample essentially not reacting with reagent and then next sample extremely overreacting baffles me unless truly bad batch

I can believe 3.7 PPM if being diligent with socks has that dramatic of effect over last 1.5 weeks
 
OP
OP
Ryan15236

Ryan15236

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
413
Reaction score
160
Location
Kingsport, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I tested tonight and took sample from DT instead. Test results = 40.3ppm

Could this number be true? I got a similar number about two weeks ago before last WC. If so, why such a discrepancy between sample taken from refugium (3ppm) vs 40.3 ppm)
Refugium is after filter socks and skimmer
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,232
Reaction score
92,243
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I tested tonight and took sample from DT instead. Test results = 40.3ppm

Could this number be true? I got a similar number about two weeks ago before last WC. If so, why such a discrepancy between sample taken from refugium (3ppm) vs 40.3 ppm)
Refugium is after filter socks and skimmer

A refugium will typically have about the same nitrate as the display if there is any reasonable flow between them.

As noted, there may be testing issues.
 
OP
OP
Ryan15236

Ryan15236

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
413
Reaction score
160
Location
Kingsport, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I tested tonight and took sample from DT instead. Test results = 40.3ppm

Could this number be true? I got a similar number about two weeks ago before last WC. If so, why such a discrepancy between sample taken from refugium (3ppm) vs 40.3 ppm)
Refugium is after filter socks and skimmer

A refugium will typically have about the same nitrate as the display if there is any reasonable flow between them.

As noted, there may be testing issues.
Sicce 4.0 rated for 951 gph should be sufficient and jebao running around 250gph in skimmer compartment feeds a UV.

You had asked if I was sure I was dosing sodium nitrate and yes I ordered some of the food grade product from Amazon.

I’ll continue to test more frequently but I’ll probably order more reagent or contact Hanna. These numbers are everywhere
 

BryanM

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 27, 2024
Messages
7,651
Reaction score
9,361
Location
Morgan Hill
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Sicce 4.0 rated for 951 gph should be sufficient and jebao running around 250gph in skimmer compartment feeds a UV.

You had asked if I was sure I was dosing sodium nitrate and yes I ordered some of the food grade product from Amazon.

I’ll continue to test more frequently but I’ll probably order more reagent or contact Hanna. These numbers are everywhere
I'd just get more reagant, do a couple tests, and if that stabilizes, toss the current stock.
 

Tangdora

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 8, 2020
Messages
705
Reaction score
379
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Are you using the same dosing syringe that you are dosing your nitrate solution with to draw the tank water itself.
 

gbroadbridge

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 25, 2021
Messages
5,405
Reaction score
5,607
Location
Sydney, Australia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Good idea. I will keep you updated if I do this. I’m going to retest this evening or tomorrow and get sample from refugium again and see if this gets similar results as the 3.7 ppm from this morning

One sample essentially not reacting with reagent and then next sample extremely overreacting baffles me unless truly bad batch

I can believe 3.7 PPM if being diligent with socks has that dramatic of effect over last 1.5 weeks

Try a different test kit. Salifert for example.
 
OP
OP
Ryan15236

Ryan15236

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
413
Reaction score
160
Location
Kingsport, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Good idea. I will keep you updated if I do this. I’m going to retest this evening or tomorrow and get sample from refugium again and see if this gets similar results as the 3.7 ppm from this morning

One sample essentially not reacting with reagent and then next sample extremely overreacting baffles me unless truly bad batch

I can believe 3.7 PPM if being diligent with socks has that dramatic of effect over last 1.5 weeks

Try a different test kit. Salifert for example.
I have an old API I could try
 

Amstar

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 9, 2020
Messages
820
Reaction score
481
Location
Dayton
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
have you tried a LFS to see what their test shows compared to yours? take water from the same area/source for your test and your LFS to see how they compare --
 
OP
OP
Ryan15236

Ryan15236

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
413
Reaction score
160
Location
Kingsport, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Tested this morning.
Hanna checker results 36.7ppm. Similar results to 40.7ppm from Tuesday 10/28
However I did use an API nitrate test and looks to me to be zero. Curious on thoughts here? Also trying to decide on how much water change based of results normally 20% every 2 weeks.


20251031_091522_6EB46794-3E9C-4AE3-B290-AB07237426F7.png

20251031_091522_D1D529AF-67D3-4BAA-AFDB-604E1942DD66.png
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.6%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 43 35.0%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.0%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.5%
Back
Top