This is probably for another thread but don't forget who put out the Coral Lab paper: Ecotech. You can read into that however you like. The Ecotech fan base will even throw around World Wide Corals' name to solidify their point.
I have NOTHING against Ecotech. I have 2 MP10wQDs that I absolutely love and I think the new diffuser takes their lights to a new level. So much so that I've contemplated getting the Aquatic Life hybrid and an XR15 to run on my tank. Then I see my tank under a Radium bulb and get rid of that crazy notion.
The Radion name literally comes from trying to copy and emulate the Radium bulb (which they didn't achieve IMO.) At least not at first.
I've always found growth is determined more by stable parameters and available food.
I actually think that we consumers would have to be opposed to such actions from any company in our midst. Can you imagine if all the aquarium companies, including the stores, like
BRS, would do that? Can you imagine
BRS publishing the videos trying to sell you their products and ignoring real facts?
If that is true, it shows the character of the company and it's not cool.
Yes, the "Radion" name is to literally try to emulate "Radium".
That's the way I see. Huge old strategy. There was a need to auto affirm themselves since the beginning and step into the market to win! Radion fixtures won't get even closer to Radiums, but that kinda of pursuit their users, giving them the comfort to try and keep thinking that was a good deal. And it works!
Do you think they work with those scientist's vests? Huuummmm....
I can't fully blame EcoTech for it cause they are doing business. They sure are doing good. They even got Dr. Sanjay and Mr. Paletta into their party!!! Are you kidding?! Haha! I think we are the ones to analyze and see for ourselves too. I still hope Dr. Sanjay will wake up from the nightmare soon...
The thing with
World Wide Corals and that apple paper is just another chapter. It's so sad that many intelligent people could fall into their net. But
WWC are into the business and the partnership was in their vision probably a strong hit.
I still kinda think that
WWC had a true belief in those lights and had to choose it because of the circumstances in regards to the electricity available for the whole store after expanding to the new area at that time. It all came together at that time. That's what many confirmed here in the forum too. I could feel that when I called them back then.
Many also have said how "bad" those LEDs are doing today and I wish
WWC would change it.
I would be humbly happy for them.
Anyways...
IMHO growth and color would have a lot to do with the quality of light we choose in the first place. And all aspects of light would play with the color/growth factors. Of course there are other secondary factors, like feeding, water chemistry and stability.
Just my opinion.
Grandis.