Need help with trident/apex

Ryannewell1

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 6, 2021
Messages
16
Reaction score
7
Location
Chesapeake virginia 23322
What state or country do you live in
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Does any1 have the scoop on APIs aquaspin water parameter reader? My lfs uses it for testing water. (I currently run trident/apex) but my trident is reading alot lower than my hand testers(hanna) and my LFS api aquaspin machine. And yes i have recalibrated my trident already didnt change. Any help would be great. Torn on what to follow and use as far a numbers. Ill attach my lfs numbers on the paper/ versus my trident readings. ..

Screenshot_20211016-140746_APEX Fusion.jpg 20211016_134031.jpg
 
Does any1 have the scoop on APIs aquaspin water parameter reader? My lfs uses it for testing water. (I currently run trident/apex) but my trident is reading alot lower than my hand testers(hanna) and my LFS api aquaspin machine. And yes i have recalibrated my trident already didnt change. Any help would be great. Torn on what to follow and use as far a numbers. Ill attach my lfs numbers on the paper/ versus my trident readings. ..

Screenshot_20211016-140746_APEX Fusion.jpg 20211016_134031.jpg
What am I missing - it looks like the paper version alkalinity is 7.7 and your Trident is 8.39? So - isn't your trident reading 'higher'?

As to the question - Did you take the samples at the same time (i.e. the trident and your LFS)? Did you completely remove all the air from the sample you brought to the LFS? Did you bring the sample quickly to the store? Was the temperature the same?

Anyway - I dont know what your Hanna is reading - but I would not be concerned with 8.39 and 7.7. And having said that - if I have 2 pieces of equipment reading the same and a third one that off (assuming taking into account the margin of error in the test) - I would tend to believe the 2 that are matching.
 
What am I missing - it looks like the paper version alkalinity is 7.7 and your Trident is 8.39? So - isn't your trident reading 'higher'?

As to the question - Did you take the samples at the same time (i.e. the trident and your LFS)? Did you completely remove all the air from the sample you brought to the LFS? Did you bring the sample quickly to the store? Was the temperature the same?

Anyway - I dont know what your Hanna is reading - but I would not be concerned with 8.39 and 7.7. And having said that - if I have 2 pieces of equipment reading the same and a third one that off (assuming taking into account the margin of error in the test) - I would tend to believe the 2 that are matching.
Same timeframe and yes my hanna reader is closer to the lfs paper reading
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHICH TYPE OF MISTAKE TAUGHT YOU YOUR MOST EXPENSIVE REEFKEEPING LESSON?

  • Moving too quickly or adding too much at once

    Votes: 9 32.1%
  • Skipping—or shortening—quarantine or dipping

    Votes: 5 17.9%
  • Buying the wrong equipment the first time

    Votes: 4 14.3%
  • Ignoring maintenance, warning signs, or redundancy

    Votes: 9 32.1%
  • Chasing numbers or making too many changes

    Votes: 3 10.7%
  • Choosing incompatible fish, corals, or invertebrates

    Votes: 5 17.9%
  • Poor aquascaping or tank-design decisions

    Votes: 2 7.1%
  • Failing to research an animal’s needs

    Votes: 1 3.6%
  • Trusting bad advice

    Votes: 4 14.3%
  • Doing something on the tank when you should've gone to bed

    Votes: 5 17.9%
  • Something else—tell us below

    Votes: 4 14.3%
  • I’m still waiting for my first expensive lesson!

    Votes: 3 10.7%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new