Need help with trident/apex

Ryannewell1

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 6, 2021
Messages
16
Reaction score
7
Location
Chesapeake virginia 23322
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Does any1 have the scoop on APIs aquaspin water parameter reader? My lfs uses it for testing water. (I currently run trident/apex) but my trident is reading alot lower than my hand testers(hanna) and my LFS api aquaspin machine. And yes i have recalibrated my trident already didnt change. Any help would be great. Torn on what to follow and use as far a numbers. Ill attach my lfs numbers on the paper/ versus my trident readings. ..

Screenshot_20211016-140746_APEX Fusion.jpg 20211016_134031.jpg
 

MnFish1

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
26,916
Reaction score
24,616
Location
Midwest
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Does any1 have the scoop on APIs aquaspin water parameter reader? My lfs uses it for testing water. (I currently run trident/apex) but my trident is reading alot lower than my hand testers(hanna) and my LFS api aquaspin machine. And yes i have recalibrated my trident already didnt change. Any help would be great. Torn on what to follow and use as far a numbers. Ill attach my lfs numbers on the paper/ versus my trident readings. ..

Screenshot_20211016-140746_APEX Fusion.jpg 20211016_134031.jpg
What am I missing - it looks like the paper version alkalinity is 7.7 and your Trident is 8.39? So - isn't your trident reading 'higher'?

As to the question - Did you take the samples at the same time (i.e. the trident and your LFS)? Did you completely remove all the air from the sample you brought to the LFS? Did you bring the sample quickly to the store? Was the temperature the same?

Anyway - I dont know what your Hanna is reading - but I would not be concerned with 8.39 and 7.7. And having said that - if I have 2 pieces of equipment reading the same and a third one that off (assuming taking into account the margin of error in the test) - I would tend to believe the 2 that are matching.
 
OP
OP
Ryannewell1

Ryannewell1

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 6, 2021
Messages
16
Reaction score
7
Location
Chesapeake virginia 23322
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
What am I missing - it looks like the paper version alkalinity is 7.7 and your Trident is 8.39? So - isn't your trident reading 'higher'?

As to the question - Did you take the samples at the same time (i.e. the trident and your LFS)? Did you completely remove all the air from the sample you brought to the LFS? Did you bring the sample quickly to the store? Was the temperature the same?

Anyway - I dont know what your Hanna is reading - but I would not be concerned with 8.39 and 7.7. And having said that - if I have 2 pieces of equipment reading the same and a third one that off (assuming taking into account the margin of error in the test) - I would tend to believe the 2 that are matching.
Same timeframe and yes my hanna reader is closer to the lfs paper reading
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.4%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 44 35.5%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.8%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.5%
Back
Top