I am not sure how this happened but I have been battling a Dino outbreak for several months. I am currently trying Silicate dosing and even though I see a lot of Diatoms in the sand, rock and glass, the microscope still shows a lot of Dinos in the samples I have taken from the sand...
I don't have any corals right now. I have lost the few that I had. Also, the tank is about 3 years old.
So, I was thinking about this step...
Removing most of my sand and replacing it with some Live sand from Tampa bay Saltwater. Any thoughts on if that would likely help me get rid of the Dino outbreak?
Thanks.
Tank is 5'x2'x22". ~150G total water volume. I have a good skimmer, roller mat, Algae scrubber and UV. My guess is I ran the UV too much and that created an environment for the Dinos to grow. it also started when I added a few pieces of Dry rock to my established aquarium.
This is not a typical toxic dino bloom, but reading about them might give you some ideas and at least some perspective....the first post is all you NEED to read, but reading some of the cases in the other thread posts might also be interesting (there's 12,000+ of them tho....no need to read them all!!):
https://www.reef2reef.com/threads/dinoflagellates-–-are-you-tired-of-battling-altogether.293318/
You might also consider posting there and/or having your thread moved to that subforum:
Thanks Randy. What would be the order of priority for removing the Bio Media vs the Algae Scrubber? I am assuming I don't want to remove all but maybe. Thanks.
If things are suffering due to the ultra-competition for nutrients, then I'd decommission all of the extras you added. There should be no downside. (The downside would be allowing things to continue as-is.)
Thanks for the replies. I am a little confused / unsure about something...
I local guy I know who maintains tanks and has for 30+ years stopped by and looked the tank over and he said my tank is too dirty and it needs a deep cleaning. He did a 25 gallon water change and cleaned the sand bed pretty heavily. He said there is way too much fish and food waste built up in the sand bed and in the rocks. He also said I need better flow through the rocks and the tanks. He thinks this is the cause of my issues. It is true that I have not been cleaning my sand bed. I don't really do a lot of water changes but for a while I did do ~ 10% auto water change per week. Tank is ~ 3 years old.
So, can it be true that my water tests show very low nutrients but the tank is still dirty and needs to be cleaned better?
I would consider this guy to be "old school".
Thanks!
I think he's probably correct on all counts. For certain on the cleaning up the tank part.
Using a small powerhead to blast the rocks and sand is one way. Siphon cleaning the sand is another.
If you have been broadcast feeding, stop.
When you feed the fish make sure you only put as much in the tank as they can consume in a given time.....don't put so much that it can drift down to the sand or into the rocks without being eaten. Do everything you reasonably can to NOT waste food in the tank.
It's hardly ever true that a tank has "enough" flow.....an improvement is almost always possible.
How does that explain tanks that have 3" of detritus in the sump and grow SPS like crazy? The older the tank the higher the nutrients usually. The older the tank the less algae there is.
This can be true, but it is definitely not necessarily true....plenty of tanks with a lot of detritus that have problems. And old tanks have their problems as well...."Old Tank Syndrom" is the catch-all term for many of them.
Not sure your question, however it is established science what causes dinoflagellates blooms and “Red Tides”.
More of an ongoing concern than established if you ask Google Scholar.
The only generic term to characterize the causes is "disturbance". Disturbances cause HAB's. (Harmful Algae Blooms)
What kind of disturbance matters depends on which dino (or other algae; cyano and others are also capable) we're talking about. There's still VERY active research in this area tho....not that much feels really settled to me.
I have a microscope but I am unable to take a picture.
You can lay your phone-camera's lens on the eyepiece and get good photos. This even worked on the toy scope I started out with. Takes a little finesse, but it's doable.
UV is 25 watt Aqua Ultraviolet...
Make sure flow is correct for their rating vs parasites. (Double check on their website.)
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0...-b1ec-465e-b087-6fbe63031952.pdf?v=1741196543
Looks like you should measure about 400 GPH coming out of the UV......check it with an actual measurement of water flow if possible. E.g. catch return flow in a cup or bucket and time how long it takes to fill it up. Do the math to arrive at gallons per hour.
Bulb is about a year old.
This is more or less expired. Carefully check that the quartz tube is more or less clean while you're changing the bulb.