Overflow and pump

pastelball

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
301
Reaction score
80
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am going to order a pump. Buy, not sure on his many gph i may need. Setting up a herbie overflow. Will have. 3/4" drain through the bottom of the tank. Its a 34 gallon frag tank going to be display. It will have a 3/4 return and 1" emergency drain. I am thinking it will be around 300 to 400 gph through the 3/4 drain. Does this sound close?
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
15,213
Reaction score
8,968
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Return pump are sized based on return plumbing, not based on the drain rating. (Unless you're running an ultra-high-flow return like it's 1990, then a standard drain system should be adequate.)

Can you post the details of your return plumbing, as least as much as you have planned?

You at least need to know:
  • total length of plumbing
  • size of plumbing
  • total vertical height between the sump and the return outlet
  • target flow rate (300 GPH)
  • display tank size (guessing 75 gallons from the flow rate?)
  • list of fittings you'll use
You can then calculate how much additional head loss there will be from friction using a calculator like this:
http://www.freecalc.com/fric.htm
 
OP
OP
pastelball

pastelball

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
301
Reaction score
80
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
OK, will look into that. I am going to run 3/4 for my return. It will be about 4 ft vertical run to a 3/4" 90 into the tank. Its a 34 gallon frag tank. Going to make it a display.
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
15,213
Reaction score
8,968
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
70-140 GPH is all you need.....hardly worth a fancy drain. :)

3/4" plumbing or even 1/2" ought to be plenty.

And at that flow rate, there's virtually nothing to worry about from friction loss:
Pressure Loss (psi): 0.01 Head Loss (ft): 0
Line Number:
Date: 2/10/2017
Nominal Pipe Size: 0.75
Pipe Schedule: SCH 40
Flow Rate (gpm): 1
Viscosity (cP): 1
Specific Gravity (water=1): 1.025
Temperature (F): 79
Pipe Roughness (ft): 0.000016
Actual Pipe ID (in.): 0.824
Fluid Velocity (ft/sec): 0.6
Reynolds Number: 3934
Flow Region: Critical Zone, Results are Suspect
Friction Factor: 0.04
Overall K: 4.44
Piping Length (ft): 5
Short Radius Elbows: 1
Pipe Exit : 1

http://www.lifegardaquatics.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Q1-AQUARIUM-Lit.pdf
A Quiet One 1200 would be right on target. You can use the builtin control to turn it down to minimum flow for minimum power usage and still have good flow, or just leave it wide open for a good stronger flow. Either setting is good and will keep your sump and sump-gear functioning well.

Quiet One's are very inexpensive so I still like them as a go-to, especially on moderately sized systems. But I'd also consider equivalent Eheim, Sicce and Mag models. Like the Eheim 1048 or 1250...Syncra 1.0...and Mag 2 or 3.
 
OP
OP
pastelball

pastelball

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
301
Reaction score
80
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thinking of going with the quiet one 2200. I know is 594 gph but, i may tee off for other equipment in the future.
Would this be a good idea?
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
15,213
Reaction score
8,968
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It's not a bad idea, especially if it makes perfect sense for your situation, but it's not how I like to do it generally speaking.

Keep the return pump the return pump. If you need flow for another application later, get another little pump.
 
OP
OP
pastelball

pastelball

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
301
Reaction score
80
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
so after looking at what I need for pluming. Looks like am and going to need 4 ft of 3/4 pvc and 3 90's. looks like the 1200 will still work.

Pressure Loss (psi): 0.01 Head Loss (ft): 0
Line Number:
Date: 2/12/2017
Nominal Pipe Size: 0.75
Pipe Schedule: SCH 40
Flow Rate (gpm): 1
Viscosity (cP): 1
Specific Gravity (water=1): 1
Temperature (F): 78
Pipe Roughness (ft): 0.000016
Actual Pipe ID (in.): 0.824
Fluid Velocity (ft/sec): 0.6
Reynolds Number: 3838
Flow Region: Critical Zone, Results are Suspect
Friction Factor: 0.041
Overall K: 3.87
Piping Length (ft): 4
Short Radius Elbows: 3
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
15,213
Reaction score
8,968
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yep! :)

You can also try 2 gallons per minute in the calculator just to see what the difference is on the "higher end" of the flow rate.
 
OP
OP
pastelball

pastelball

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
301
Reaction score
80
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Looks like it's good even with 2 gallons.
Thanks for all your help.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 33.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.3%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top