Uncommon is an expert on glass as is Joe. Let's see what they have to say?
@UncommonSense
@Joe Glass Cages
I just examined one of Joe’s tanks in excruciating detail all afternoon, in fact! I can confidently say that he holds the crown here!
That said, I’ve had the pleasure of working with many hundreds of pounds of both standard soda-lime float glass, and low-iron…
In my experience, they are equally challenging to scratch… granted, I almost exclusively use a square edged razor blade held in my fingertips so I have maximum force feedback to feel for a caught blade edge, and I go through blades like candy so I always have a good scraping edge…
That said, here are the facts:
— Both standard glass, and low-iron glass are ~2.5g/cm3 density, both are 5-6 hardness, or 4.5-4.7 GPa Knoop hardness. They are effectively identical from a physics perspective.
Now, this ignores the fact that low-iron glass has a physically higher light transmission % (<10%, varies by thickness)… this translates to improved visual clarity, which might actually cause smaller scratches to be more perceptible on low iron, vs. standard glass!
There’s also the price factor; if you paid extra for the low-iron glass, you’re more likely to notice any little imperfections in it!
TLDR: both types of glass are almost identically scratch resistant, you’re just more likely to actually notice the scratch exists on low-iron glass!
Edit: for the curious among you, here’s an interesting glass performance comparison from the world of windows, highlighting the aforementioned light transmittance benefit at various thicknesses!