Stable output setup for Ca reactor

CO2doser

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
48
Reaction score
23
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I’ve a 3' 70g mixed reef tank with 10 fishs, some LPS and SPS. To keep KH/Ca/Mg level, I bought an used Ca reactor, CO2 cylinder, and a pressure regulator from my friend, and he has switched to dosing pump to supply those elements. He told me that the output of Ca reactor is not stable, and I have to fix the problem of unstable CO2 and effluent rate to make the output stable.

OK, I installed the Ca reactor, and found the CO2 rate changed from time to time, and need fine tune the needle valve. The effluent rate decreased after a week due to clog. No wonder my friend switched to dosing pump.

I google to get an answer, and found digital CO2 doser, which is not needle valve, could solve the problem, and keep stable CO2 rate.

To keep efflent stable, someone in a forum suggested me to buy a peristaltic pump, but wow, it is expansive.

Later, I got an idea, in order to keep the PH value inside CA reactor in a certain level, a PH controller to turn on and off a usual water pump to pump out the Ca water could stable the PH level, and effluent output. For example, when PH value of a Ca reactor drop to below 6.8 (my setting) PH controller will turn on a water pump until the PH value rises to 6.9.

This allow the use of a cheaper pump to let effluent out, and the high flow rate prevents clog.

This is my way to solve the usual problems of calcium reactor to make it stable in a long run.
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
15,213
Reaction score
8,968
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Good luck! The usual (best?) answer is to use a gear-driven peristaltic pump such as a Stenner or Chemtrek, etc. Something to consider as a backup plan. :)
 
OP
OP
CO2doser

CO2doser

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
48
Reaction score
23
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes, I considered this setup before, but those peristalic pumps are expansive, and tube need to be replaced in several months.

The setup of using PH controller to pump out Ca water to stable PH value has ran about a year to serve for my tank. Digital CO2 doser work fine. They are very stable. I think it is a better and easier way than dosing pump to dose these elements.
Anyway, thanks for your suggestion.
 

Timtim

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi CO2doser,
I am having the same problem as you do. The needle valve is just a pain in the A** to get it right. Do you mind to show a picture or two of your setup. Thanks.
 

Diesel

ME=1, CANCER=0.
View Badges
Joined
Apr 14, 2012
Messages
13,611
Reaction score
15,160
Location
Texas Republic Grand Ranch.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
OP
OP
CO2doser

CO2doser

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
48
Reaction score
23
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The gear-driven peristaltic pumps you can find on Ebay or sometimes here for less than $400.
This electronic doser is a no brainer for CaRx http://www.aquariumplants.com/CarbonDoser-Electronic-Co2-Regulator-p/co2.htm
I just use a regular plain old Eheim pump for three years and I haven't had a single problem with my effluent.

It is expansive solution.

The way I suggested is using PH controller to control a much cheaper pump to pump out the effluent.

The advantage includes

(1) You do not need to fine tune peristaltic pump to match PH value inside CaRx when tank demand changed.

(2) Constant PH value inside CaRx is required to stable ratio of Ca and Mg output, if use Mg media.

(3) More efficient usage of CO2: when PH inside CaRx not reach set point, for example 6.7, then no effluent out. All CO2 is mixed with media to make Ca/Mg water. Less residual CO2 results less PH drop in display tank.
 
Last edited:

csb123

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
779
Reaction score
765
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Keep checking on eBay for a Masterflex or Stenner pump. I bought 2 with an appropriate head, used, for about $140 each. They apparently live forever and the tubing is cheap. You can buy 10 foot lengths from US plastics. These in combination with an electronic CO2 regulator make calcium reactor adjustments a breeze...priceless!
 
OP
OP
CO2doser

CO2doser

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
48
Reaction score
23
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Here is my setup

IMG_20161124_201600.jpg


Digital CO2 Doser control CO2 flow with long term stability.

PH controller turn on/off a cheap pump to stable PH inside CaRx.
 

Timtim

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Cool !
I have put an order on this co2 doser thing over the weekend, too bad it is not on Black Friday sale. Overall still cheaper than the peristaltic pump solution . I'll update when I receive it from Amazon.
 

gus6464

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 8, 2015
Messages
753
Reaction score
384
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Carbon doser is a $20 regulator wrapped in $280 worth of electronics. It is a very cheap unit. For $300 you can put together a dual stage setup with an ideal vernier needle valve that will last longer than you.

Funny how the carbon doser was initially advertised for planted tank folk but no serious planter will even touch it with a 10ft pole.

As for a continuous cycle peristaltic is concerned keep checking ebay. I got my Masterflex for $200 with head and then got enough LS-17 tubing to last a lifetime on ebay for $30.
 

Timtim

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Gus6464,
Are we talking about the same thing ? The one I ordered is called "digital co2 doser" sold in amazon and is cheaper.
 

julian0326

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 30, 2016
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I’ve a 3' 70g mixed reef tank with 10 fishs, some LPS and SPS. To keep KH/Ca/Mg level, I bought an used Ca reactor, CO2 cylinder, and a pressure regulator from my friend, and he has switched to dosing pump to supply those elements. He told me that the output of Ca reactor is not stable, and I have to fix the problem of unstable CO2 and effluent rate to make the output stable.

OK, I installed the Ca reactor, and found the CO2 rate changed from time to time, and need fine tune the needle valve. The effluent rate decreased after a week due to clog. No wonder my friend switched to dosing pump.

I google to get an answer, and found digital CO2 doser, which is not needle valve, could solve the problem, and keep stable CO2 rate.

To keep efflent stable, someone in a forum suggested me to buy a peristaltic pump, but wow, it is expansive.

Later, I got an idea, in order to keep the PH value inside CA reactor in a certain level, a PH controller to turn on and off a usual water pump to pump out the Ca water could stable the PH level, and effluent output. For example, when PH value of a Ca reactor drop to below 6.8 (my setting) PH controller will turn on a water pump until the PH value rises to 6.9.

This allow the use of a cheaper pump to let effluent out, and the high flow rate prevents clog.

This is my way to solve the usual problems of calcium reactor to make it stable in a long run.

How much is the PH controller?
 
OP
OP
CO2doser

CO2doser

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
48
Reaction score
23
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
try watching this :

Great video.

It is a kind of fix effluent method. By adjusting co2 rate to adjust the Kh output.
He use a digital co2 doser to keep co2 rate stable. That is good.
The continuous flow is the part that I do not agree to have long term stability.
I used continue flow before, but fail to be stable in less than a month.

Therefore, I switched to use a PH controller to turn on/off a water pump to keep PH value inside CaRx stable.

You could start the turn on PH from 7.4 like the video suggested, and then reduce it with more co2 if tank demand more.
 
OP
OP
CO2doser

CO2doser

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
48
Reaction score
23
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.4%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 44 35.5%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.8%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.5%
Back
Top