Good Morning.
Nstocks - I did enable logging within the Control Center, and did a quick graph in the Control Center software. So even thou can not do it within myGHL, you do have the ability to trend your probes in Control Center. Sorry not much data yet, as I just turned them on last night to log some readings.
As which one as performed better to this point? I have to say the GHL, only because when I first tried to setup my Apex 2016, I had a heck of a time getting it connected to Wireless, and finally gave up and used a Ethernet cable to a extender to get it online so I could web into it and configure it. Even thou I had to download a software package, connect the P4 via USB it was very simple, and it was nice to see the wireless strength also on the device once connected.
glweek - Some quick History. I been a Neptune user for over 3 years, and was an avid apex gold user and switched when the 2016 model came out because I loved the feature to know what my outlets were doing. I like the ability to see how much power was being consumed by the outlets. I had two crashes of the 2016 unit and never on the Apex Gold unit. Neptune support did assist both times very quickly. The first crash we worked with support, who took logs from the unit and did determine the issue and it was fixed in the next software release. The second crash was most bizarre. I lost power and my generator kicked on after 10 seconds, a UPS was plugged into the Apex unit, the same way I use to do my Apex Gold (Neither were set to monitor for power outages. I was using the UPS more for surge and not have the Apex units hiccup during a power outage). Needless to say the Apex did not fully back up, and what did come back up made no sense, some of my modules were up, while others were offline. What made matters worse, that some of my outlets were controlled by other modules with probes (PH for example) that were not online. Needless to say that when the fun began, even thou the outlets did not see the real probe readings what it did report on was reading below the parameters of the configured and begin turning on outlets that should not been on (There nothing to say in your programming what happens if the probe is not there and the readings are now bogus). My EB832 and EB8 were in Fallback mode in a off position, because they lost connection to the Apex, while one Eb832 was up and running partially with probes used to tell the outlets what to do based probes that were no longer online. Even thou the Eb832 was showing up it was not, it has a large ! within fusion and should have failed to fallback off mode, but yet believed it was connected. Again the return pump turned off again, because it saw a large spike in PH (It was being monitored by a PH monitor). Working with support we also noted a large gap in my logs that could not be explained. I was asked to upgrade the unit software (I was one version behind, which I usually do not jump to till I know it stable, usually when I see on the forums beta software coming) which I did, and was asked to simulate the outage again(Which I have not yet done, but plan to with both units online). They never did telnet into the device the second time while the failure was happening, did not collect logs, which they did during the first crash. To get my devices back online I followed the directions they provided first I did the upgrade, did not fix anything, and then disconnected everything and plug one module in at a time (could be a bad aqua bus cable, or a bad module per support). Doing this allowed the Apex to fully come back online, and I slowly plugged everything back in and everything came up.(Had to Calibrate probes a few days later) I reported back to them what I did following there instructions. I asked any idea's what caused it and was told could have been a fluke. After this second crash I lost confidence, it was a hard decision with 1000's invested in Neptune equipment but I could no longer take a chance on it possibly damaging my investment in my reef tank. I felt the Apex Gold was a very stable product, and thought that would be the same on the 2016 unit.
My decision was not done lightly. Based on the research I knew some of my programming was going to change, and that I would need to think about how to adjust for it. I also knew I was going to loose some features switching, but pick up others in return. I also had to take into account support, yes there are more people on the USA that use Apex, while overseas GHL is bigger. I had to weigh all the factors but the first was reliability, programming then last cost. I need to know is it stable, I need to program the unit do what I need it to do, and last the cost. Yes cost did play a factor in my decision but when you begin to question reliability, cost begins to fade as a factor.
I hope when I am done posting all these posts, people will see and understand how to program the unit. I believe their is not enough out there explaining how to do certain functions within the P4. Comparing the two is a bonus, people will now see how I programmed both and they both work a true comparison.