Tank birthday, 47+ years

  • Thread starter Thread starter Paul B
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None
On a certain UK forum, one guy accused me (yes that's the right word) of only keeping hardy fish like damsels and clowns etc which is nonsense of course as I also have a cleaner wrasse a Regal angelfish and a multibar angelfish amongst others that are thriving. with no problems what so ever. When I pointed this out he didn't even have the decency to reply or retract his accusation. I find that a lot with people who question what I do and my success, now and again somebody will come back with a well done etc but most just slink away that's fine by me however as it helps prove a point and not just the fact I keep some delicate fish not just the hardy ones.
 
Unfortunately this place and the world itself is full of haters ... regardless of your honest opinions and sincerity. Even worse when it's hateful posts coming from the desk of the computer ....
 
Unfortunately this place and the world itself is full of haters ... regardless of your honest opinions and sincerity. Even worse when it's hateful posts coming from the desk of the computer ....
When I am priven wrong about something I hold my hands up and apologies. We all make mistakes and am certainly no different but a little common courtesy costs little.
 
Admitting to honest mistakes and apologising about it .... is man up to misunderstanding or whatever and we all learn from it. No need for others to further "flame the fuel" again ... :). That's why we have R2R unlike other forums. Stay compose and I guess don't be too quick being judgemental etc.

I've dealt with haters and eventually over the years ... you learn to ignore and move on as if nothing had happened!! :D
 
Can we get some updated shots if your 40 year old tank?

Cheers!
 
Today, and yesterday I am kind of sick and I very rarely get sick. But I am not as immune as my fish, I think that is because I have Grand Kids. I think I may have a touch of HLLE or velvet so my wife is giving me fresh water dips and dosing me with Przapro and coppersafe. My pH is 8.4 but my PO4 is a little high.

My wife noticed I was sick because I was breathing air up near my ceiling.

I am only drinking RO/DI water and making sure the temperature is 78 degrees. I ordered some blackworms and will mix those with a little Mastick so I can stick them on the wall and I can snack off of that all day.
I will also darken the lights and keep my bully neighbors away.

She is so precious...
 
Can we get some updated shots if your 40 year old tank?

Cheers!

I am not sure if you are talking to me but my tank is 46 years old and in a month it will be 47. :D

I don't have an updated shot, this one must be a few months old.


This is how many of these cute little guys I removed from my glass every day for the last 3 days, and it is full again. I am experimenting with them even though they hate that. :eek:

 
This is how many of these cute little guys I removed from my glass every day for the last 3 days, and it is full again. I am experimenting with them even though they hate that. :eek:


Deep fry them and roll them in powdered sugar. I'm sure they will be a hit. ;)
 
I see the difference in clarity in the 2 pails, but how much of that actually happens in the tank, with a constant supply of detritus and in Paul’s case, mud.
-Zack

In the video you reference with the two buckets, you can see the dramatic reduction in water cloudiness in a tilapia tank in just a few days. Ozone and UV do work well and make a tank remarkably clear. You can see in the pictures Paul posts, his water is always very clear. The Ozone isn’t a silver bullet (one thing that fixes all), but it is part of why he is so successful long term. Even if it is a small part, it is still a part of the overall formula. His tank and ways are something to be proud of, no doubt.
 
Why on earth would I want to change my practices that have worked flawlessly for almost half a century? Almost everyone has problems, but I don't. I would have to be nuts to change and to change just for a test is more nuts.
The only reason I have any SPS corals in my tank is because someone on RC argued with me that they would never live in my tank because it was to dirty. So I bought a few and they grew all over the place. And I don't even like SPS. Then someone told me I could not keep a Hippo Tang because of parasites. I bought one and after 10 years I gave him away with no parasites. Someone asked me to add those stupid bio pellets to my tank for nitrates. I did and almost crashed my tank.

I can make extreme claims because my tank is the oldest on here with no problems and all my paired fish are spawning which I posted pictures of. You should ask someone who has a tank with problems to do things you suggest.

This is like telling Henry Ford that he should not use an assembly line, instead go back to building cars in garages and see if that works out better.



If anyone believes that my ozonizer is keeping my tank parasite free, then they should run out and buy an ozonizer. Plenty
Unfortunately this place and the world itself is full of haters ... regardless of your honest opinions and sincerity. Even worse when it's hateful posts coming from the desk of the computer ....

I hope that you are not referring to my posts as that of a hater. Please clarify as that is not my intent by any means.

Also, as an invited guest to this thread, I have not replied to all posts but have been trying to in my spare time. If there is anyone that is waiting for a response, please let me know and I will try better to explain my reasoning.
 
Today, and yesterday I am kind of sick and I very rarely get sick. But I am not as immune as my fish, I think that is because I have Grand Kids. I think I may have a touch of HLLE or velvet so my wife is giving me fresh water dips and dosing me with Przapro and coppersafe. My pH is 8.4 but my PO4 is a little high.

My wife noticed I was sick because I was breathing air up near my ceiling.

I am only drinking RO/DI water and making sure the temperature is 78 degrees. I ordered some blackworms and will mix those with a little Mastick so I can stick them on the wall and I can snack off of that all day.
I will also darken the lights and keep my bully neighbors away.

Paul, While your post made me laugh, I do hope you feel better very soon! :)
 
Paul, While your post made me laugh, I do hope you feel better very soon! :)

Thank you. I don't think I am croaking or anything, I just feel like I got ich and am coughing my brains out so I don't have much brains left. :eek:

I am a Manly man so I think I should be cured tomorrow. :rolleyes:
 
I won't try to answer this because I would only be guessing and I don't like to guess. I only like to post things I can prove.

My water quality is lousy because as I said many times, I have about 20 fish which I bought all as babies. They don't die so they all got big, some tripled in size which means that now I have way too many fish for my 100 gallon tank (I really think it is a 90 but I never measured)

My copperband alone grew from quarter size to about 5". I want all my fish spawning and immune which they are. To do that they need to be over fed and overfed with the proper foods.
If I had the time I could change a lot of water and reduce the nitrates even though they don't seem to affect anything. I am sure I can't put delicate SPS in my tank which is fine because that is not my goal.

I know that is the goal of most people and that is fine. Lately I have been on a quest to get all the paired fish spawning and immune. If I was on an SPS quest I would improve my water quality and keep those as I have done for years in the past.

I am moving soon near the sea and I will change all of my water with NSW (my fish will probably get a stroke and croak) I don't care because my tank is an experiment and always has been. I am far past trying to keep things alive and healthy. I figured that out decades ago and I try to teach those methods to anyone who cares to learn. I am also far past trying to prove anything as I don't have to.

There are many things I don't know. That is the main reason I am experimenting and if I kill things or crash my tank, so be it. I will learn something from it.

I had many moorish Idols, I failed with all of them because to succeed with an Idol or any fish we need to keep it until it dies of old age. I am guessing an Idol lives about 12 or 15 years and as far as I know, no one with a home tank has ever kept one that long. My last one I kept about five years which is not a success. To learn about them I went to Tahiti, Bora Bora and Hawaii to dive with them and I learned their habits and what they eat. I replicated that as much as I could and now, I think I can keep one much longer, but my tank is to small so I will wait until I move and get a larger tank.

People find copperband butterflies difficult, I have no problems with them.

Mandarins are another one and people try all sorts of things to keep them. They are easy and all you need is a few minutes a day to keep them. Mine have been spawning for many years as well as my pipefish and every other paired fish I have.

Very few fish are hard to keep, you just need to learn a few things about them and not from someone who started last Tuesday and has kept "One" of them for a few weeks.
People keep saying they are successful with certain fish for this reason or that. "WE are not successful with anything unless it does of old age"


I think those pipefish are about to beat up your butterfly in that picture lol! Likely over some supermodels
 
I won't try to answer this because I would only be guessing and I don't like to guess.

Paul, In keeping this light but educational, I'll reference the literature. It may benefit some of those who are trying to learn all of your ways. If they aren't aware of how it all works, this may help. You have more time running ozone in the hobby than probably anyone else and one of the ingredients to your recipe for success may include your long term use of an ozone generator. I know you are convinced that it doesn't matter but the science suggests otherwise. This isn't a down against you by any means. You are helping others no matter what. You are not alone in your practices either. O2manyfish, glennf, and many others with prize tanks also run ozone religiously. There are also many others that are equally successful without ozone but they employ a combination of other methods that you don't use to maintain high water quality. This makes you unique.

I practice many of the things that you preach and I run ozone, which you are always neutral about. I know from personal experience that I can put all the mud and what have you in my tank with little fear of an ammonia spike. The literature suggests it is due in part to the ozone generator. I'm amazed that I can never get an ammonia or nitrite reading no matter how much I feed this tank. I see tons of relatively harmless nitrate though, just as your report nitrate readings of 160. That's really not a big deal with an ozone generator running in the background.

Here is a peer reviewed summary on ozone from a credible source. It applies to saltwater tanks both large and small. Hope this helps.

https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/fishing/...nt/ozone-in-recirculating-aquaculture-systems

Ozone in recirculating aquaculture systems
Introduction
Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (RAS) provide potential advantages over pond or cage-based forms of aquaculture. These include flexibility in site selection, reduced water usage, lower effluent volumes, better environmental control, and higher intensity of production. However, as stock densities and levels of water re-use increase, wastes accumulate rapidly and environmental control becomes more difficult. Sophisticated systems capable of removing both particulate and dissolved organic wastes become necessary.

Conventional means of solids removal, such as micro-screen filters and sedimentation tanks address the removal of coarse settle-able and filterable solids, but not the removal of fine colloidal solids. Similarly, bacterial nitrification in biofilters removes dissolved ammonia and nitrite, but not other dissolved wastes. As the organic loading increases with intensity of production, the bacteria that convert nitrite to nitrate operate less efficiently, resulting in increased nitrite levels. The accumulation of fine colloidal solids, dissolved organics and nitrite in RAS can impair biofilter function, and increase biochemical oxygen demand and stress levels in the cultured stock. The net effect of this residual organic waste is a less stable, less productive system.

Increasing the daily water exchange rate in an RAS will remove accumulated colloidal solids, refractory organics and nitrite, to the detriment of water budgets and the cost of heating or cooling the system. The alternative method of removal is to breakdown these organic wastes using an oxidizing agent, such as ozone. Ozone is also widely used to sterilise supply and effluent water for RAS to remove pathogens. This advisory paper discusses use of ozone in RAS aquaculture, including methods of application, benefits of usage and potential risks.

The Chemistry of Ozone
Ozone is a clear, blue coloured gas that produces an easily detected pungent odour at concentrations as low as 5 parts per million (ppm) in atmospheric air. At higher concentrations of ozone the air becomes acrid and extremely hazardous to health. Ozone (O3) is formed when an oxygen molecule (O2) is forced to bond with a third atom of oxygen (O). The third atom is only loosely bound to the molecule, making ozone highly unstable. This property makes ozone an excellent oxidising agent and ideal for use in water treatment. However, storage is difficult and dangerous. For these reasons ozone must be generated on-site and used immediately.

Uses of Ozone
Ozone can be used in water treatment for the following purposes:

Removal of fine and colloidal solids
Fine and colloidal solids consist of particles 1-30 microns (m m) and 0.001-1 m m respectively. The small size of the particles enables the solids to remain in suspension and avoid most mechanical methods of separation. The accumulation of fine and colloidal solids can impair biofilter nitrification efficiencies and stress fish stocks.

Ozone removes fine and colloidal solids by causing clumping of the solids (microflocculation), which facilitates removal by foam-fractionation, filtration and sedimentation.

Removal of dissolved organic compounds
Dissolved organic compounds (DOC’s) or refractory organics, give the water a characteristic tea-coloured stain. DOC’s are non-biodegradable and accumulate according to feed input, water exchange rate and the rate of solids removal. High levels of DOC’s can stress fish and reduce nitrification efficiencies of the biofilter.

Ozone removes dissolved organics by:
  • oxidation into products that are more readily nitrified in the biofilter; (Your 160 nitrate reading)
  • including precipitation, which enables removal of waste particles by conventional filtration or sedimentation.
Removal of Nitrite
Nitrite can accumulate as production intensifies and organic loadings on the biofilter increase. Bacteria that process ammonia into nitrite (Nitrosomonas spp) operates more efficiently under high organic loadings than bacteria that process nitrite to nitrate (Nitrobacter) and levels of nitrite rise accordingly.

High levels of nitrite can be toxic to fish. Data available for silver perch, Bidyanus bidyanus indicates levels of nitrite as low as 2.8 parts per million (ppm) can reduce growth of fingerlings by 5%.

Ozone removes nitrite by:
  • direct oxidation to nitrate; (160 nitrates)
  • reducing organic loading, which improves biofiltration efficiency and nitrification.
Disinfection
The high stocking densities, associated fish stress and increased nutrient loads found in RAS create an ideal environment for fish pathogens. An important step in reducing the risk of disease outbreaks in RAS is the use of standard quarantine procedures for any fish introduced. Facilities using surface waters, including RAS and flow-through hatchery systems, are also interested in reducing the pathogen load introduced via the source water. The disinfection of effluent waters before introduction to the environment is also crucial to prevent the translocation of exotic diseases.

Ozone can effectively inactivate a range of bacterial, viral, fungal and protozoan fish pathogens. The effectiveness of ozone treatment depends on ozone concentration, length of ozone exposure (contact time), pathogen loads and levels of organic matter. If high levels of organic matter are present, the demand created by oxidising the organic matter can make it difficult to maintain enough residual ozone for effective disinfection.

Production of Ozone
Most commercially available ozone generators use either corona discharge or an ultraviolet (UV) light source to produce ozone. In corona discharge generation, a high-energy electric field is established between two metallic plates and dried air or oxygen gas is fed through the plates. The electrical energy excites a proportion of the oxygen molecules creating atoms of oxygen (O). The oxygen atoms then bond to oxygen molecules in the feed gas to create ozone.

UV light of a certain wavelength (140-190nm) can be used to excite and break the oxygen molecules to generate ozone in a similar way. UV generators are less expensive to purchase than corona discharge generators, but at present is a much less energy efficient way of producing ozone.

Use of oxygen as the feed gas increases the yield of ozone from both UV and corona discharge generation substantially when compared with dried air, but has an associated cost.

Ozone Application
System specifications
The design of the ozone reactor or contact vessel is very important for safe, successful ozonation. There is a range of reactors available using various designs to transfer ozone to the water. Designs include fine bubble diffusers, turbine contactors, injectors, deep u-tube reactors, packed columns, static mixers and spray contact chambers. Some designs are also used for oxygen transfer or aeration. Each design has advantages and disadvantages not discussed here.

Important considerations when choosing a reactor include:
  • ozone transfer efficiency;
  • leak-free design and construction;
  • construction with ozone resistant materials.
Materials used in an ozone treatment system must be highly resistant or inert to ozone. Use of improper materials can lead to erosion of the unit and cause dangerous and costly leakages. Such systems are not suitable for the long-term application of ozone and require on-going, high replacement costs. The generation of ozone in systems with substandard materials is also less efficient as ozone is lost as the materials of the reactor are oxidised. The use of some plastics, such as polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polycarbonate is not recommended for long-term applications for this reason. Galvanised steel is also not recommended.

Stainless steel contact chambers and piping are recommended for use with ozone. Valves should be made of stainless steel, with gaskets and membranes of Teflon or similar.

Treatment Regimes
Ozone can be applied continuously, as a series of treatments per day or as a single batch treatment per day. Application in most situations can be linked to the feeding strategy employed in the culture system. Three to four hours after feeding fish, the concentrations of ammonia, dissolved organics and other wastes products reach a maximum. If fish are fed several times during the day, a series of ozone treatments can be introduced after each feed to target the associated rise in waste levels. If feed is introduced 24 hours per day, water quality degrades continuously and so ozone application should be continuous. A single batch ozone treatment can be used to target rises in waste levels in the system associated with a moderate feed event or to treat batches of exchange or inlet water from the supply source.

Continuous ozonation is beneficial when compared to batch and serial treatments because water quality remains relatively stable. However, the lower costs of serial and batch ozonation make these treatments regimes viable management options.

The required amount of ozone for treatment in an RAS is usually calculated according to the daily feed rate. Rates of 10-15 g of ozone per kilogram of feed are generally recommended to reduce accumulated organics. Any background organic loadings of the source water used for the RAS should also be taken into account.

If disinfection is the primary goal of ozonation, the amount of ozone necessary is largely dependent on the background organic loading of the water to be treated. In pure water, residual concentrations of 0.01-0.1 ppm ozone for periods as short as 15 seconds can be effective in reducing bacterial loads. However, in water with organic loadings the residual ozone concentration and/or contact time of ozone must be increased to produce significant disinfection. Natural waters (seawater, brackish and freshwaters) generally require residual concentrations of between 0.1-0.2 ppm ozone and contact times of 1-5 minutes for disinfection. Aquaculture effluent generally requires between 0.2-0.4 ppm residual ozone for 1-5 minutes for significant disinfection to occur after oxidation of organics.

The optimum rate of ozone for disinfection is highly variable and represents the sum of ozone demands from dissolved organics, colloidal solids, nitrate and disinfection. In many situations in RAS, the cost of production of sufficient residual ozone for complete disinfection after all other ozone demands are met is prohibitive. However, some reduction in pathogen loads can be achieved using moderate levels of ozone, and water quality improvements are considerable.

Disinfection of exchange and effluent water is more cost effective than treating the entire system due to the relatively small volumes treated. Disinfection of source water with ozone, in combination with quarantine procedures for incoming stock, reduces the risk of disease outbreak within the system.

Site of Application
Ozone is reported to be toxic to a wide range of fresh and salt-water organisms at residual concentrations between 0.01 ppm and 0.1 ppm. When deciding where to introduce ozone the effect of residual concentrations from the reactor on either the biofilter or fish stocks should be carefully considered. There are several locations in a RAS where ozone may be added depending on the desired outcome.

  • Oxygen feed gas - A common method of introduction uses existing oxygen transfer systems to add ozone with the oxygen feed gas. This generally occurs after the biofilter and just prior to the culture tank. Due to the proximity to the culture tank this method carries a moderate risk of exposing fish to residual concentrations of ozone. By retaining water in a contact chamber (de-ozonation unit) for several minutes before it passes to the culture tanks, this risk can be reduced. Advantages of this option include reduction of pathogen loads and nitrite levels immediately prior to contact with fish stocks.
  • Pre-biofilter - Addition of ozone before the biofilter is also popular. This method carries a lower risk of exposing fish stocks to residual ozone. Any residuals present must first pass through the biofilter and are used in the oxidation of biofilms. In this way the biofilter effectively buffers the fish stocks from toxic effects of ozone. However, if levels of residual are too high performance of the biofilter may be affected, leading to decreased nitrification. An advantage of applying ozone before the biofilter is that the oxygen produced as a reaction end product of ozone increases dissolved oxygen levels in the biofilter. This is particularly beneficial in submerged biofilters. However, for trickling biofilters any by-product oxygen is effectively lost to the atmosphere.
  • Incoming water supply - Ozone can be introduced into the incoming supply water as it enters the building to achieve disinfection. This prevents entry of pathogen loads to the system and enables isolation of healthy stock. For RAS relying on surface water supplies disinfection at this point is very important. It should be noted that ozonation of incoming water alone would not address the build-up of organics within the system.
  • Effluent - Conversely, ozone can be used to disinfect effluent exchange water before it leaves the building to prevent exotic disease loads from entering the environment. This can be done most effectively on bath loads of effluent prior to release to irrigation or discharge systems.
Ozonation of water prior to coarse solids removal is not recommended. Treatment of coarse solids by ozonation is prohibitively expensive as levels of residual ozone must be increased to address the additional ozone demand.

Direct treatment of the culture tank is not recommended. This method carries a high risk of exposing fish stocks to residual ozone concentrations.

Ozonation of brackish or seawater results in the production of different by-product oxidants to freshwater. Ozone reacts with bromide and chloride ions in saltwater to produce relatively stable oxidants that are toxic to aquatic organisms. Use of ozone in saltwater systems is usually restricted to batch treatment of water separate to the main recirculating flow. Activated carbon filtration can be used to remove residual ozone and other oxidants from ozonated saltwater.

Measuring Ozone in RAS
The direct measurement of ozone in a water sample is generally achieved using colorimetric test kits and spectrophotometry. However, these methods can be too coarse to detect the low residual levels lethal to some fish species and are unsuitable for continuous in-flow monitoring. A common way of providing some level of continuous in-flow monitoring for ozone is the use of oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) probes. Rather than measure ozone directly, an ORP probe measures the total capacity, in millivolts (mV), or various oxidants in a solution to oxidise an electrode. By keeping ORP measurements within a certain range, the levels of total oxidants can be controlled, which gives indirect control over ozone. A safe ORP level of freshwater fish culture is generally considered to be 300 mV.

Many systems automate ozonation by linking ORP measurement and the ozone generator, so that the generator switches off once the required ORP is reached and cuts back in when ORP drops again. Factors such as pH, temperature and species cultured will determine the exact targeted ORP level. However, due to the lack of direct measurement of ozone and because ORP probes can take several minutes to register a charge in ORP, any use of ORP to measure and control ozone application is approximate. For this reason it is recommended that ozone control using ORP measurements allows for some error and limits are set conservatively. Other water quality parameters, particularly nitrite, should also be monitored in close association to ORP and used to gauge the effect of ozonation.

The Risks
Ozone is a very effective oxidising agent for use in water treatment and reduction of pathogen loads in RAS. However, use of any chemical of this nature is accompanied by considerable risks. RAS viability may be threatened in several ways.

  • The reduction of nitrite levels by ozone carries a risk. The biofilter receives less nitrite and the population of bacteria responsible for processing nitrite to nitrate diminishes. If any disruption to ozonation occurs, dangerous spikes in nitrite concentration can subsequently develop.
  • High residual ozone concentrations are a risk to cultured fish stocks causing gross tissue damage and stock mortalities.
  • High residual ozone concentrations are a risk to bacterial films on the biofilter. Disruption to biofilter performance can cause large fluctuations in ammonia and nitrite levels. This can have a lethal effect on fish stocks or at the very least reduce stock health and growth performance.
It is recommended that a de-ozonation unit be installed directly after ozone application in a RAS to prevent toxic residual levels. This should be done regardless of the location of ozone application in the system. A simple do-ozonation unit consists of a contact chamber to increase the retention time of water, allowing ozone to degrade. Alternatively, an in-line activated carbon filter or biofilter can also function as a de-ozonation unit. Degassing of residual ozone also occurs in packed column aerators and trickle filters. Any residual ozone gas should be vented from the RAS building and destroyed before release.

Ozone is extremely toxic and any exposure to humans constitutes a serious health hazard. Decrease in lung function, aggravation of asthma, throat irritation and cough, chest pain, shortness of breath and the inflammation of lung tissue are typical symptoms of ozone exposure. In cases of prolonged or severe exposure, chronic respiratory illnesses such as emphysema, chronic bronchitis and premature aging of the lungs may occur.

Exposure standards for residual ozone of various Australian and International occupational health and safety administrations range between 0.05 and 0.1 ppm for an 8 hour work period and a maximum single dosage of 0.3 ppm for less than 10 minutes. Workcover Australia has a maximum exposure standard for residual ozone of 0.1 ppm for 8 hours.

It is therefore important to repeat the requirements of a leak-free ozone reactor made of suitable ozone resistant materials. Venting of sheds or areas of a RAS where ozone is used is also highly recommended. Humans can detect low levels of residual ozone as a sharp, pungent odour, but continued exposure can quickly dull the senses. For this reason perceived odour should not be used as an indicator of ozone presence.

Test-kits for the detection of air-borne ozone are commercially available and are a useful tool in helping to ensure the safety of RAS operators.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps a stiff jolt of this will help clear up this illness that is afflicting you...

Cure? - 1.jpg
 
Thank you. I don't think I am croaking or anything, I just feel like I got ich and am coughing my brains out so I don't have much brains left. :eek:

I am a Manly man so I think I should be cured tomorrow. :rolleyes:

Too much ozone maybe. ;)
Get well soon.
 
Thank you for that article.

I also do this with my 5' trough I have installed over my tank
A simple do-ozonation unit consists of a contact chamber to increase the retention time of water, allowing ozone to degrade.

This one sentence is the reason I installed Ozone in the first place.
Ozone removes fine and colloidal solids by causing clumping of the solids (microflocculation), which facilitates removal by foam-fractionation, filtration and sedimentation.

I referenced Ozone pretty much before I put it on my tank as it was relatively new for tanks at the time.

Don, I have been using Grand Marnier. :rolleyes:

Atoll, Thank you. :cool:
 
Thank you for that article.

I also do this with my 5' trough I have installed over my tank


This one sentence is the reason I installed Ozone in the first place.


I referenced Ozone pretty much before I put it on my tank as it was relatively new for tanks at the time.

Don, I have been using Grand Marnier. :rolleyes:

Atoll, Thank you. :cool:

My first ozonizer was a Sander which was not the most reliable, they simply didn't like high humidity as found in cabinets plus they really needed dry air to work effectively. That was about 30 years ago and after it died on me I never used another as I found Oxydators instead. Monder ozonizers are much more reliable of course but I have no need for one now I use Oxydator's. I tried to find a pic of the one I had on the net but no luck probably because they predate the net like lots of old equipment it's hard to find such on the net.

EDIT I managed to find a small pic of one.

sander ozonizer.jpg
 
Last edited:
I hope that you are not referring to my posts as that of a hater. Please clarify as that is not my intent by any means.

Also, as an invited guest to this thread, I have not replied to all posts but have been trying to in my spare time. If there is anyone that is waiting for a response, please let me know and I will try better to explain my reasoning.

Hey Dogtown ... oh no please pardon my "bad" English as it's not my mother tongue :p. I'm in no position to tell off anyone here ... I'm just a fly on the go ... :D PEACE ;)!!
 

WHEN YOU SEE A REEF2REEF POLL, WHAT’S YOUR USUAL MOVE?

  • Vote right away, then head to the comments

    Votes: 11 40.7%
  • Read the comments first...then decide what I think

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • Vote and explain my choice in the comments

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • Dude, I just vote...I don't care about the comments

    Votes: 12 44.4%
  • Vote, then come back later to see how it turned out

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • Pick “Other” because my opinion is too nuanced to fit any of your simpleton boxes

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • I usually read the comments but exercise my right not to vote

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I always get excited about Daniel’s daily polls, obviously 😎

    Votes: 3 11.1%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 3 11.1%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new