Understanding 1st ICP Test

OP
OP
K

Kika

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 17, 2025
Messages
59
Reaction score
28
Location
saint cloud
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi,

I just received my first ICP results from FM (please see attached). However, I would like your input on what to prioritize/ do next?

For context, I am currently on a 2-part dosing system, Reef Pro AB.

Thank you kindly.


20260601_115024_405956D4-030D-41EF-8723-F5C2B8B33AF1.png


20260601_115024_2E2E967D-6ACF-4B12-920D-294290208B92.png


20260601_115024_90F46460-583B-481F-B5C9-8063E5C878A6.png

The last page here tells you exactly which change to prioritize - second to last column.

I would focus on priority 1 and 2.

Once these have been dialed in, you might want to take another ICP and determine progress, and then graduate to priority 3 items.

Priority 4 items are considered ‘nice to have been dialed in’, but are not necessary and in some cases should actually not be adjusted unless they were based on an MS, not OES test.

Your dosing additions seem to add certain elements disproportionately, so you might want to look into this.
Thank you kindly
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,786
Reaction score
93,363
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The last page here tells you exactly which change to prioritize - second to last column.

I would focus on priority 1 and 2.

Once these have been dialed in, you might want to take another ICP and determine progress, and then graduate to priority 3 items.

Priority 4 items are considered ‘nice to have been dialed in’, but are not necessary and in some cases should actually not be adjusted unless they were based on an MS, not OES test.

Your dosing additions seem to add certain elements disproportionately, so you might want to look into this.

The assumption is, however, that one agrees with the FM targets and recommendations and priority order.

As a general rule, I do not agree with all of what they claim.
 
OP
OP
K

Kika

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 17, 2025
Messages
59
Reaction score
28
Location
saint cloud
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The last page here tells you exactly which change to prioritize - second to last column.

I would focus on priority 1 and 2.

Once these have been dialed in, you might want to take another ICP and determine progress, and then graduate to priority 3 items.

Priority 4 items are considered ‘nice to have been dialed in’, but are not necessary and in some cases should actually not be adjusted unless they were based on an MS, not OES test.

Your dosing additions seem to add certain elements disproportionately, so you might want to look into this.

The assumption is, however, that one agrees with the FM targets and recommendations and priority order.

As a general rule, I do not agree with all of what they claim.
Just saw this, but thanks for sharing. Who would you recomed for icp test?
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,786
Reaction score
93,363
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I’d recommend icp-ms. I know Oceamo does a good job. Others may as well, but these sorts of tests do need knowledgeable scientists running them so picking on cost only is not necessarily a good plan.
 

huttoreefer

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Messages
28
Reaction score
6
Location
Hutto
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Your test looks fine.

I do the ICP-MS once every month, and follow the ReefMoonshine method.

My mag test comes back usually lower than the salifert test, +/- 50.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 2 18.2%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 5 45.5%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 4 36.4%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new