Using mb7 for carbon dosing as main ingredients ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Patx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Patx

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
1,200
Reaction score
977
Location
Montréal
What state or country do you live in
Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hello,
55g system
10 years old Fidji live rock, always be in use.
1 years CaribSea Arag Alive Special Grade Reef Sand 20 lbs - Live Sand
(1/2 to 1inch all over)
Refugium 15g bare bottom, lv,cheato,xenia,caulerpa,frag.
10% wc/week
Feeding, pellets ~1 gram/ day


I'm reaching a point where my parameter are very stable whit my dosing.
I have a 4 dosing pump. (AFR/BB/MB7/KH2PO4)
AFR for alk and trace.
BB for bacteria and trace.
MB7 for bacteria and reduce NO3.
KH2PO4 for keeping some po4.
I aim wide on the bacteria to leave as little room as possible for the possible Dino & friends. I've been branded by dinos in the past so I'm a little paranoid.


This is where I am.
ALK: 7.9-8.1 by dosing AFR 4ML/day
Po4: 0.03-0.05PPM by dosing 1.2ml bacto-balance/day + kh2po4 for +0.04ppm/day No3: 18-15ppm by dosing 5ml of microbacter7/days .

What i find :
Bacto-balance certainly reduces my po4.
But do not influence my No3.
Dosing 0.6ml or 1.2ml doesn't affect no3 but do play whit my po4.

Mb7 don't do much on po4.

In the past 6 months i was dosing mb7 1/ml/day and VSV to control my No3.
I dont have room in my dosing pump for VSV...
So i stop VSV and increase mb7 to 5ml/day, which is more than the maximum recommended dose.
-
is this really a long term problem?
-should i stop mb7 and switch to VSV?

currently the tank is fine, 6 months have passed since i turned on the lights and added fish/coral. mainly zoa and some frags of sps.

any comments or remarks are welcome !
Thanks.


1000002235.jpg
 
Last edited:
Agreed. While adding MB7 may be good as a food for corals, its use alone as a nutrient lowering mechanism seems unlikely to be generally useful.
 
I am not against the idea of greatly reducing the MB7 over several days to see how the No3 reacts. but I have the strong impression that they will rise to around +2ppm/day.
 
I am not against the idea of greatly reducing the MB7 over several days to see how the No3 reacts. but I have the strong impression that they will rise to around +2ppm/day.

Maybe, but I do not most often see folks report ongoing nitrate reduction when using MB7.
 
Maybe, but I do not most often see folks report ongoing nitrate reduction when using MB7.
It does work good for that if it’s fed a carbon source… there’s a thread floating around I can’t remember which one but his nitrates were around 100 and he couldn’t get them down with vodka alone so I recommended mb7 and it started coming down.. coincidence idk but I’ve been a mb7, carbon source fan to keep my nutrients in check. It’s worked for years.. and is a great coral food as you mentioned.
 
Hello,
55g system
10 years old Fidji live rock, always be in use.
1 years CaribSea Arag Alive Special Grade Reef Sand 20 lbs - Live Sand
(1/2 to 1inch all over)
Refugium 15g bare bottom, lv,cheato,xenia,caulerpa,frag.
10% wc/week
Feeding, pellets ~1 gram/ day


I'm reaching a point where my parameter are very stable whit my dosing.
I have a 4 dosing pump. (AFR/BB/MB7/KH2PO4)
AFR for alk and trace.
BB for bacteria and trace.
MB7 for bacteria and reduce NO3.
KH2PO4 for keeping some po4.
I aim wide on the bacteria to leave as little room as possible for the possible Dino & friends. I've been branded by dinos in the past so I'm a little paranoid.


This is where I am.
ALK: 7.9-8.1 by dosing AFR 4ML/day
Po4: 0.03-0.05PPM by dosing 1.2ml bacto-balance/day + kh2po4 for +0.04ppm/day No3: 18-15ppm by dosing 5ml of microbacter7/days .

What i find :
Bacto-balance certainly reduces my po4.
But do not influence my No3.
Dosing 0.6ml or 1.2ml doesn't affect no3 but do play whit my po4.

Mb7 don't do much on po4.

In the past 6 months i was dosing mb7 1/ml/day and VSV to control my No3.
I dont have room in my dosing pump for VSV...
So i stop VSV and increase mb7 to 5ml/day, which is more than the maximum recommended dose.
-
is this really a long term problem?
-should i stop mb7 and switch to VSV?

currently the tank is fine, 6 months have passed since i turned on the lights and added fish/coral. mainly zoa and some frags of sps.

any comments or remarks are welcome !
Thanks.


1000002235.jpg
So you’ve been dosing all that with no live stock in the tank or lights? I can only imagine it’s gonna change now with corals as they uptake some of your n03 and p04 to live.. you might be changing your dosing schedule soon.. I only see a diamond bar for fish? It should be fairly easy to keep them down if that’s your thang with less feedings.
 
So you’ve been dosing all that with no live stock in the tank or lights? I can only imagine it’s gonna change now with corals as they uptake some of your n03 and p04 to live.. you might be changing your dosing schedule soon.. I only see a diamond bar for fish? It should be fairly easy to keep them down if that’s your thang with less feedings.
Nope.
(Working on balance) Dosing this in the tank you see on picture...
Diamond,Clown, hawkfish,blenny,gramma, YELLOW wrass :beaming-face-with-smiling-eyes:

You can go to my tank thread for more info.
(I did it simple here)
 
It does work good for that if it’s fed a carbon source… there’s a thread floating around I can’t remember which one but his nitrates were around 100 and he couldn’t get them down with vodka alone so I recommended mb7 and it started coming down.. coincidence idk but I’ve been a mb7, carbon source fan to keep my nutrients in check. It’s worked for years.. and is a great coral food as you mentioned.

I agree that some folks make the claim that adding bacteria helps drop nitrate. I'm skeptical that the observations are always for the reasons claimed, but if a product like MB7 boosts denitrifying bacteria relative to aerobic bacteria consumption of organics, that will accelerate nitrate reduction.
 
just because i like the follow-ups... 9 months later ...

things evolve and the relationships we make between the pieces of the puzzle on the spot are often wrong or just changing.

so: no more mb7... 5more fish...
no3 NOW stable... 3-5ppm...
Po4:0.05-0.1
I am at the point where I have to reduce the amount of light in my refugium where I also keep less cheato...

i don't get it, but i accept it.

AFR 11ml/day
Np bacto balance : 1.2ml/day
KH2PO4 : for +0.05ppm/day

1000006110.jpg
 
Last edited:
just because i like the follow-ups... 9 months later ...

things evolve and the relationships we make between the pieces of the puzzle on the spot are often wrong or just changing.

so: no more mb7... 5more fish...
no3 NOW stable... 3-5ppm...
Po4:0.05-0.1
I am at the point where I have to reduce the amount of light in my refugium where I also keep less cheato...

i don't get it, but i accept it.

AFR 11ml/day
Np bacto balance : 1.2ml/day
KH2PO4 : for +0.05ppm/day

1000006110.jpg
Pretty simple! For one I believe afr has a slight carbon source and the bacto balance is a carbon source that feeds the current bacteria in your tank which make them grow more rapidly! In the end everything is balanced out and your biome is more stable now!
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HOW MUCH DOES A FISH’S FEEDING REQUIREMENTS AFFECT YOUR STOCKING DECISIONS?

  • A lot! - I avoid fish that require frequent or specialized feeding

    Votes: 16 32.7%
  • Quite a bit, but an automatic feeder can change my answer

    Votes: 6 12.2%
  • It depends on whether my nutrient export can handle it

    Votes: 7 14.3%
  • It depends on how badly I want the fish

    Votes: 11 22.4%
  • Not much. I’m willing to adjust my routine

    Votes: 9 18.4%
  • Not at all. Feeding demands don’t limit my stocking choices

    Votes: 8 16.3%
  • I usually learn about the demanding feeding schedule after buying the fish!

    Votes: 2 4.1%
  • I haven’t really considered this before

    Votes: 4 8.2%
  • Something else (see my comments in the thread)

    Votes: 1 2.0%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new