Why shouldn't macrogae be in your display?

Tinnerito

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 9, 2024
Messages
638
Reaction score
468
Location
San Antonio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If you've read my posts, you know that all of my displays are macroalgae dominant, with little to no coral. I recently was told by some hobbyists that macroalgae does not belong in a display, especially caulerpa, and only should be in a sump or refugium. That also makes me realize that I know very few people online that actually have macroalgae in their display tanks. I assume many of you also keep your macros in a fuge, but why exactly? I want to read your standpoints. What experiences do you have with macro in your display? Good? Bad? My clownfish seem to love the softness and smoothness of my caulerpa, my clown gobys like perching on my textured, firm gracilarias, and macroalgae will keep nitrates low, make homes for my copepods, and are visually appealing. so I would imagine they're a positive contribution to a saltwater aquarium.
 

Miami Reef

Reef Chem Enthusiast
View Badges
Joined
Sep 8, 2017
Messages
17,255
Reaction score
29,618
Location
Miami
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There are many macro algae tanks.

Here’s an example:

Some people like corals, some people like fish-only, and some people like macroalgae.
 
Upvote 0

sixty_reefer

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
6,907
Reaction score
8,559
Location
The Reef
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I’ve always enjoyed macro algae’s in the display, I just think it’s usually more balanced to have slow growing species to avoid a total take over by one species.
There is many reefs were both algae and coral live in a cool harmony.
 
Upvote 0
OP
OP
Tinnerito

Tinnerito

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 9, 2024
Messages
638
Reaction score
468
Location
San Antonio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I’ve always enjoyed macro algae’s in the display, I just think it’s usually more balanced to have slow growing species to avoid a total take over by one species.
There is many reefs were both algae and coral live in a cool harmony.
That's exactly what I'm thinking!
 
Upvote 0

alonsooro

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
65
Reaction score
26
Location
Mexico
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think is based on preferences. Many like more corals than algae, and algae grow faster than corals.
As always, you will have what you like.
'Doesn't belong to display' is something i not agree at all, but sure you have to prepare to the type of aquarium you are developing.
If you like more algae, you should have some caution about predatores (mostly tangs), since they will sometimes eat most of them.
IMHO i like them a lot, but i don't use them in display because:
1. they grow faster than corals
2. i control them in refugium for fauna population
Have fun, since this kind of setup is not very common, but is so pretty
 
Upvote 0

BeanAnimal

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
9,293
Reaction score
15,586
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Broad subject with broad assumptions.

In general, many species of macro algae can quickly become a hard to control nuisance in the display and/or block light to coral. Therefore, it is not a popular option for most that keep coral.

I don't think there is any need to expound beyond that simple point. If an individual prefers to deal with it for whatever reason, then that is up to them and there is nothing wrong with it.

I prefer to not keep it anywhere, as I find most forms of it to be a detritus trap, aiptasia breeding ground, potential drain clogger and something else that has to be managed and cultivated, as well, it will often ad tannins to the water.
 
Upvote 1

jabberwock

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
4,749
Reaction score
5,678
Location
in front of my computer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
IMG_7046.jpg
 
Upvote 0

Vetekli

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 1, 2024
Messages
115
Reaction score
32
Location
Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I like to have red algeas in my DT. Dont see any negatives to it. They dont grow as fast as caulerpa etc, which require too much maintenance for my taste. My fav is dragons breath. Grows well but not too fast, consumes nutrients and is stunning.
 
Upvote 0
OP
OP
Tinnerito

Tinnerito

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 9, 2024
Messages
638
Reaction score
468
Location
San Antonio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think is based on preferences. Many like more corals than algae, and algae grow faster than corals.
As always, you will have what you like.
'Doesn't belong to display' is something i not agree at all, but sure you have to prepare to the type of aquarium you are developing.
If you like more algae, you should have some caution about predatores (mostly tangs), since they will sometimes eat most of them.
IMHO i like them a lot, but i don't use them in display because:
1. they grow faster than corals
2. i control them in refugium for fauna population
Have fun, since this kind of setup is not very common, but is so pretty
I've never had a tang before so that makes sense. I'll remember when I do!
 
Upvote 0

vlangel

Seahorse whisperer
View Badges
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
7,691
Reaction score
9,069
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Nice !
I can't keep "red macro" alive
:confused-face:

Any tricks?
As long as my nutrients are kind of high, the gracilaria hayi and the botrycladia (red grape caulerpa) do well. That is also how I keep coral with macros,,,have the nutrients high enough that there is plenty to go around.
 
Upvote 0

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,263
Reaction score
92,313
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I love macroalgae better than many corals, since they move with the flow, but one limitation is it can make algae control in the display harder since many herbivores that consume pest algae will consume many types of macroalgae.
 
Upvote 0

Faurek

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 19, 2021
Messages
361
Reaction score
262
Location
Portugal
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
People who tell you they don't belong in the display are entitled coral people with a short mind.
Macros not only belong in the display but also help it in many ways, those must be entitled SPS fanatics or "high end" LPS junkies who think macroalgae is too good to be with their corals or run only blues so the macros look like garbage.
I like macroalgae and I belong to both SPS fanatics and macroalgae lovers, so I tend to keep both and experiment with it.
As long as the algae is not brushing on corals or stripping nutrients like crazy it's fine.
IMG_20221120_201655.jpg

The black stuff on the back is Caulerpa, I did experiment with various degrees of actinic light and macro growth in various iterations of tanks and lights, as seen the acro on the front was not bothered by the Caulerpa.
Running a refugium or putting in the display is mostly the same thing, water goes so fast that it just becomes one type of water either way.
 
Upvote 0

Faurek

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 19, 2021
Messages
361
Reaction score
262
Location
Portugal
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yeah just be careful with macros bothering the corals and signs of low nutrients.
The tank looks good.
Your tank, your style. A personal tank should reflect personal taste.
 
Upvote 0

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 38 27.3%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 47 33.8%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 30 21.6%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 14 10.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.2%
Back
Top