Acro STN polyps out. Help
- Thread starter EpicWin
- Start date
- Tagged users None
bobssecrtsn
Well-Known Member
Carbon has little affect on SPS. but not enough for them to start STNing. BUT if it were like KENT carbon (when they had a recall on them) then yes you SHOULD take it offline.
kuansreef
Well-Known Member
This happened to my acros. You are making a mistake. Carbon is the culprit. Take it out now and see it for myself. No Polyps is the first sign to Dead. I have run carbon for 6 months and couldn't keep acros alive. i thought there was no way carbon would cause this. My acros kelp peeling out flesh from base and eventually gone. I have no carbon in my tank for a month now and my acros grow like a jungle.
That's quite the bold statement considering the countless people that run GAC regularly in SPS tanks. Also, to assume that GAC is depriving an aquarium of trace elements is a stretch at best. Do you have anything scientific to back up that claim?
Rockhead
Well-Known Member
Well let me tell my story, everything you are saying is what I went thought also, and what I'm running now is just bio pellets and a swc160 on my 150 gal and I have colors that I never seen in some of my SPS. I did have a BRS dual reactor with GFO/ carbon 1/2 a cup of each and from what I realized is that my water was just that clean, hard be believe but like some say SPS do like a little dirty in there water just not as much a LPS. how about this I also have a 29 bio cube with no skimmer on gfo and no carbon just a bag of seachem purigen and have 3 fish and 5 piece of lps and things are doing great. remember what i tell you docent mean the same will work in your tank.
-Tom
-Tom
Here is a tank photo. I appreciate all of the input from everyone. Time will tell if it is the carbon as the gfo is now gone. I know he carbon isn't toxic because ive been using the same bucket for a few diff tanks and others have no issues. I'm thinking now about bio pellets. Does a normal reactor run them?
Last edited:
bobssecrtsn
Well-Known Member
can you please share a picture of your system! im curious
jackson6745
Valuable Member
I'm going to go the other way on this. Kuan, most of us use carbon and gfo with no problems so you definitely had something else going on. Perhaps you were starved?
Looking at the full tank shot, you aquascape will make a detritus bomb under the huge rock wall. If it were my tank, I would reaquascape the rocks so the sandbed gets more flow, probably removing quite a bit of rock. I would also siphon all the detritus from the sanbed under rocks using one of those sand vacuums while doing a very large water change. I would also continue using gfo. I believe po4 is your problem (even if testkits read "0")
Looking at the full tank shot, you aquascape will make a detritus bomb under the huge rock wall. If it were my tank, I would reaquascape the rocks so the sandbed gets more flow, probably removing quite a bit of rock. I would also siphon all the detritus from the sanbed under rocks using one of those sand vacuums while doing a very large water change. I would also continue using gfo. I believe po4 is your problem (even if testkits read "0")
Here is a tank photo. I appreciate all of the input from everyone. Time will tell if it is the carbon as the gfo is now gone. I know he carbon isn't toxic because ive been using the same bucket for a few diff tanks and others have no issues. I'm thinking now about bio pellets. Does a normal reactor run them?
Adding bio pellets in an unhappy tank may not be the best direction to go. I suggest only consider new filtering techniques to a stable or happy tank. Otherwise you may experience a crash because of the multitude of changes in an already unstable environment
Slow and steady is always the most appropriate direction. If you added both carbon and gfo at the same time to a happy tank, I would consider pulling both and see if there is an improvement. Of course, all of this assumes your parameters were stable and known previously. All of us strive for excellent parameters but if your parameters are rock solid, the tank is flourishing , attempting multiple new improvement protocols sometimes leads to an unstable change. I have chased my tail in trying to improve an already happy environment so my motto now is if the tank is happy and my testing demonstrates appropriate parameters, I don't try chasing a better endpoint. Sometimes better isn't better at all. The ocean in a glass box is extremely fragile and it takes very little to tip the balance unfavorably
Last edited:
Similar threads
