AFR Dosing but Trace Elements Not Detectable

Jxw6963

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 25, 2025
Messages
42
Reaction score
17
Location
Fremont, ca
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been dosing All for Reef for awhile now but my ICP still shows not detectable on several elements that I would expect to show at least some levels?

AFR dosing has been around 10ml per day on a 50gal system. Tank is around 8 months old and corals are still relatively small, so probably getting most of what I need from my salt (reef crystals).
Maybe not enough of a dose yet to make a difference in the levels? Or is something odd with the results?

Note: sulfur is high due to past magnesium dosing which I've stopped.

Screenshot_20251227_124104_Samsung Internet.jpg Screenshot_20251227_125957_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
Last edited:

rishma

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Messages
2,757
Reaction score
2,499
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been dosing All for Reef for awhile now but my ICP still shows not detectable on several elements that I would expect to show at least some levels?

AFR dosing has been around 10ml per day on a 50gal system. Tank is around 8 months old and corals are still relatively small, so probably getting most of what I need from my salt (reef crystals).
Maybe not enough of a dose yet to make a difference in the levels? Or is something odd with the results?

Note: sulfur is high due to past magnesium dosing which I've stopped.

Screenshot_20251227_124104_Samsung Internet.jpg
That type of ICP cannot detect the trace element levels AFR is aiming to maintain. Not detectable in ICP-OES means below the detection limit. I saw the same thing with the same ICP. When I did an Oceamo ICP-MS that has lower detection limits I could see my trace was being maintained
 

Freenow54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 5, 2021
Messages
6,561
Reaction score
5,092
Location
Ontario Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have high mag and alk ph readings Randy suggested I use a and K so I have. I also started with Seachem photo Plankton and see slow but steady results visually. Maybe you should try it ?
 

Freenow54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 5, 2021
Messages
6,561
Reaction score
5,092
Location
Ontario Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been dosing All for Reef for awhile now but my ICP still shows not detectable on several elements that I would expect to show at least some levels?

AFR dosing has been around 10ml per day on a 50gal system. Tank is around 8 months old and corals are still relatively small, so probably getting most of what I need from my salt (reef crystals).
Maybe not enough of a dose yet to make a difference in the levels? Or is something odd with the results?

Note: sulfur is high due to past magnesium dosing which I've stopped.

Screenshot_20251227_124104_Samsung Internet.jpg Screenshot_20251227_125957_Samsung Internet.jpg
Also wonder what type of Coral . If I understand it SPS consume those elements so maybe the dose is to small. Personally I see no harm adding twice the amount. Hopefully you get a reply from the experts soon . I am interested
 
OP
OP
J

Jxw6963

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 25, 2025
Messages
42
Reaction score
17
Location
Fremont, ca
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Also wonder what type of Coral . If I understand it SPS consume those elements so maybe the dose is to small. Personally I see no harm adding twice the amount. Hopefully you get a reply from the experts soon . I am interested
I'm basing the dose on the stability of my alkalinity.

Mixed frags/smalls of
3 Lepto, cynarina, coelastrea, trachy, duncan, torch, Hammer, stylo, 2 birdsnest, few blasto, few acans, couple monti frags, etc
and several soft
 

rishma

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Messages
2,757
Reaction score
2,499
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm basing the dose on the stability of my alkalinity
You are doing it perfectly then. Your trace is likely in good shape. An ICP-OES cannot detect many of those levels. The results you got from you test are as expected.

The high sulfur is interesting. But nothing to worry about.
 
OP
OP
J

Jxw6963

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 25, 2025
Messages
42
Reaction score
17
Location
Fremont, ca
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Quick pics
 

Attachments

  • 20251227_131111.jpg
    20251227_131111.jpg
    257.9 KB · Views: 34
  • 20251227_131052.jpg
    20251227_131052.jpg
    291.9 KB · Views: 31
OP
OP
J

Jxw6963

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 25, 2025
Messages
42
Reaction score
17
Location
Fremont, ca
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You are doing it perfectly then. Your trace is likely in good shape. An ICP-OES cannot detect many of those levels. The results you got from you test are as expected.

The high sulfur is interesting. But nothing to worry about.
Yea I realized after this ICP that the seachem magnesium i was using was out of balance and leading to extra sulfur. My mag is a little high anyways so just stopping altogether and bringing sulfur down with water changes over time
 

rishma

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Messages
2,757
Reaction score
2,499
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yea I realized after this ICP that the seachem magnesium i was using was out of balance and leading to extra sulfur. My mag is a little high anyways so just stopping altogether and bringing sulfur down with water changes over time
You likely do not need to dose Mg separately while using AFR. If you want to dose extra you can dose up to 1ppm Mg for every 2.8 dKH alkalinity you dosed with AFR. But many tanks get plenty of Mg from AFR and water changes alone without adding additional.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,236
Reaction score
92,255
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Also wonder what type of Coral . If I understand it SPS consume those elements so maybe the dose is to small. Personally I see no harm adding twice the amount. Hopefully you get a reply from the experts soon . I am interested

I think it is a mistake to think sps take up any more of most trace elements than other corals or even algae.

Fluoride and strontium may be the exceptions, which each primarily gets incorporated into depositing calcium carbonate of all sorts. I do not know if dosing either has value, however.

But elements such as iron, manganese, vanadium, iodine, etc., all get taken up by lots of different organisms.in my tank, macroalgae is almost certainly the biggest consumer of many trace elements.
 

ReneReef

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 9, 2018
Messages
312
Reaction score
369
Location
The Netherlands
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Also, the sodium and chloride levels suggest a salinity below 30‰.

In my opinion that is a waaaaayyyyy bigger concern than any trace element.
In fact in the trace elements I don’t see anything of concern. Excepts maybe the high lithium.

I would correct salinity and potassium.
Plus do some extra water changes the coming months to get sulfate and lithium in line.
 
OP
OP
J

Jxw6963

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 25, 2025
Messages
42
Reaction score
17
Location
Fremont, ca
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Also, the sodium and chloride levels suggest a salinity below 30‰.

In my opinion that is a waaaaayyyyy bigger concern than any trace element.
In fact in the trace elements I don’t see anything of concern. Excepts maybe the high lithium.

I would correct salinity and potassium.
Plus do some extra water changes the coming months to get sulfate and lithium in line.
Yep, not quite that low, but for this test salinity did drift down just below 32 due to issues with my refractometer. Slowly corrected over several days since then
 
OP
OP
J

Jxw6963

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 25, 2025
Messages
42
Reaction score
17
Location
Fremont, ca
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Also, the sodium and chloride levels suggest a salinity below 30‰.

In my opinion that is a waaaaayyyyy bigger concern than any trace element.
In fact in the trace elements I don’t see anything of concern. Excepts maybe the high lithium.

I would correct salinity and potassium.
Plus do some extra water changes the coming months to get sulfate and lithium in line.
That's one thing I've now learned. Redundancy is needed for everything.
Have had issues with just about every piece of equipment I own, have to double check everything to be sure.
 
Last edited:

Freenow54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 5, 2021
Messages
6,561
Reaction score
5,092
Location
Ontario Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yep, not quite that low, but for this test salinity did drift down just below 32 due to issues with my refractometer. Slowly corrected over several days since then
Smart to do it slow in my opinion. I was messing with mine and found that it took 5 hours to stabilize , and I think I have good flow. Fairly surprised , and don't remember why I decided to exhibit such patience. Just experience of failures from the past I guess. After a lengthy thread where people admitted that they had calibration issues I got some guaranteed fluid and checked mine. I always rinse mine after use and it looks brand new. However I still have an attitude that can bend your mind Where does the proof of accuracy start ? I remember a thread where a bunch of people showed salt build up on theirs , and were talking about how to clean them . Quite honestly It took a lot of self control to not say anything but I sure wanted to butt my head against the wall. Especially when a self appointed expert lol took over
 

Freenow54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 5, 2021
Messages
6,561
Reaction score
5,092
Location
Ontario Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
That's one thing I've now learned. Redundancy is needed for everything.
Have had issues with just about every piece of equipment I own, have to double check everything to be sure.
Lithium ? I had no idea . I guess just throw in a battery every so often . Seriously where does that originate from in a natural Ocean ?
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.0%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 35.7%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.4%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.7%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 9 7.1%
Back
Top