Alk at 7.7?

nzkiwi80

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 8, 2021
Messages
154
Reaction score
19
Location
New Zealand
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So just done a test on my Alk. Don't do this one often, I used a Salifert test kit, pretty clear point when it changed color. Results 7.7

Should be closer to 8.5. I've got a Red Sea Reefer 350.

Should I try increase my Alk? if so how?

All other tests, Mg, Ca, Ph, Po, Nh3, No2, No3 all within normal range and salinity 1.025
 

20gallonreefer000

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 23, 2024
Messages
212
Reaction score
169
Location
Ontario
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So just done a test on my Alk. Don't do this one often, I used a Salifert test kit, pretty clear point when it changed color. Results 7.7

Should be closer to 8.5. I've got a Red Sea Reefer 350.

Should I try increase my Alk? if so how?

All other tests, Mg, Ca, Ph, Po, Nh3, No2, No3 all within normal range and salinity 1.025
If you want your alk at 8.5, increase it. You can use a website like this to calculate the dosage --> https://reef.diesyst.com/chemcalc/chemcalc.html
 

Red_Beard

I already did
View Badges
Joined
Feb 17, 2019
Messages
6,852
Reaction score
19,209
Location
Utah
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If your ALK is trending down, there are a number of ways to stabilize it.
* waterchanges: more work and less effective with higher alk demand, but also helps other elements and trace.
* 2 (or 3) part: there are a ton of variations coming from different companies or diy methods. It works great and is relatively cheap, but you do need to either use th balling method or keep up with water changes as it will end up with an ion imbalance over time if not.
* All for reef: costs a little more but is super easy and also supplements trace elements. Does not cause ion imbalance. Downside is that it is all in one solution so you cant tweak individual levels with it.
*kalkwasser dosing: works awesome and also gives a nice ph bump, adds both alk and cal. Most people either drip it or add it to their topoff water. Does not add trace.
* calcium reactor: expensive and complecated, but also adds trace. Best for high consumption tanks and experienced reefers.

Those are a few different options, i would recommend starting with a quality 2 part, and later going to AFR(all for reef) then you still have what you need should you need to tweak any one major element as well as having a general idea of what your tank is doing.

Either way you go, the first thing you need to do is figure out your alk consumption rate. Best way to do this, is to get a base measurement, pick a day and time, measure it. Wait 1 week, dont do waterchanges or dose anything during that time, measure again 1 week later at the same time of day. Subtract your second measurement from the first and divide by 7. Example, baseline you measure 7.7, the next one, a week later is 7.0. You subtract 7.0 from 7.7 and get .7, divide it by 7 and get .1. Your tank in that case would use .1dKh per day, and that is where you would start when dosing.
 

Miami Reef

Reef Chem Enthusiast
View Badges
Joined
Sep 8, 2017
Messages
17,255
Reaction score
29,643
Location
Miami
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
7.7 dKH is a fine target. However, you can aim for 8.5 dKH. There’s nothing wrong with doing so.

I highly recommend dosing All For Reef. It’s a single-solution system that also maintains calcium, magnesium, and trace elements, in addition to alkalinity.

Do you keep corals?
 

Science/G

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Messages
3,853
Reaction score
3,243
Location
Miami
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Since my lighting upgrade and some chunky Acropora additions, I am having a hard time keeping up with alkalinity consumption. I've been pretty stable between 7.4 -7.6. All for Reef is maxed out. My calcium is 450 and 1500 magnesium, so I am upping my dose of Balling B every few days. I am going to let it settle here. LPS are happy, SPS are colored up and growing before my eyes. If the reef want to be just higher than natural seawater so be it.
 

zheka757

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 11, 2021
Messages
4,603
Reaction score
30,318
Location
North Port
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
i keep mine between 7.5-8.0 recently it took a dip to 6 and recovered few days later after I made some adjustment to my dosing. no loses to my heavy sps system,
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,938
Reaction score
93,675
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Since my lighting upgrade and some chunky Acropora additions, I am having a hard time keeping up with alkalinity consumption. I've been pretty stable between 7.4 -7.6. All for Reef is maxed out. My calcium is 450 and 1500 magnesium, so I am upping my dose of Balling B every few days. I am going to let it settle here. LPS are happy, SPS are colored up and growing before my eyes. If the reef want to be just higher than natural seawater so be it.

Maxed out AFR does not make sense to me. Add more until alk stabilizes where you want it. Just be sure to add it in the am so O2 consumption is not a concern.
 

Science/G

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Messages
3,853
Reaction score
3,243
Location
Miami
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
@Randy Holmes-Farley I seem to have an imbalance of alkalinity consumption vs calcium and magnesium. Before I increased my Balling B dose, my alkalinity was 6.6, and my calcium was 480 and magnesium 1550. I am afraid my calcium and magnesium will go too high if I increase the AFR to achieve my desired alkalinity. I use Hanna checkers. I am following the Tropic Marin recommendations. It is a strange thing. My reef is 30 gallons packed with SPS and LPS.
IMG_20250727_180824.jpg
 
Last edited:

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,938
Reaction score
93,675
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If you use AFR to increase alk from 6.6 dKH to 9.4 dKH, calcium will only rise 480 to 500 ppm, and magnesium will rise less than 1 ppm.

I suspect the magnesium is not accurate, unless you have added a lot.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 54 41.9%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 5 3.9%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 50 38.8%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 38 29.5%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new