I think this is an overall good take to have.
However, I do think its odd that a lot of people cite personal interaction or "made-up" answers as a reason to distrust AI.
One of the first pieces of advice I had in the hobby was "Don't take advice from everyone." Exclusively speaking to humans or using information written by humans presents the same hurdles. I've been confused by conflicting responses on this forum several times.
IMO, the largest advantage to using AI is that it doesn't have an opinion. In a lot of ways, it's simply an advanced aggregator, not unlike Wikipedia. Most of the shortcomings associated with AI seem to be critiques of human nature and not the technology itself.
Yes, people should not be unwillingly replaced with machines. But it's people who make that decision in the first place. Draftsmen can blame computers all day long, but it's firm owners who have replaced them with technology and raised the bar for entry.
Reefkeeping and aquaculture are fields that can significantly benefit from AI. I'm new, but it doesn't take a veteran to realize that this is a game of pattern recognition. Why discount a tool because people misuse it due to greed and politics? It's not really any different than cellphones, calculators, or computers.