- Joined
- Aug 22, 2016
- Messages
- 72
- Reaction score
- 28
I rented a par meter from an LFS (Apogee MQ-510), and i'm a bit surprised at the results. I'm trying to replicate the BRS settings for 20g tank with 1 AI prime, and i'm expecting this:
(feel free to pause vid at this timestamp)
These are my current settings, and i'm expecting the bottom of my tank to have those readings.
However, this is how my tank readings look like. The orange annotations are the BRS 70% settings, and the reds are just just some 15%ish reduction i did. ( i shoulda saved the exact numbers, but lol)
Notice the bottom left measurement at the sand. 230 par vs 125 par i'm expecting.
Notice the top measure 6 inches below the surface, at 420 par (nice). To me, that make sense vs what BRS seem to be saying i should expect of 203?
Anywho, the BRS video was 2 years ago, maybe something happened to AI Prime 16's LED tech that they're just much better now?
I'm planning on mostly softy/LPS on this tank, and hopefully 1 Colorado Sunburst sitting at the 320 area. But I don't quite know if my lighting is too high, or if i should trust these readings. My goal is not fiddle with my lights and mess up tank stability that way.
Do these measurements make sense for an HD prime using the BRS 70% settings?
Also attached is the BRS 70% settings which I replicated for my AI Prime. The fixture is 8" above the water line.
(feel free to pause vid at this timestamp)
These are my current settings, and i'm expecting the bottom of my tank to have those readings.
However, this is how my tank readings look like. The orange annotations are the BRS 70% settings, and the reds are just just some 15%ish reduction i did. ( i shoulda saved the exact numbers, but lol)
Notice the bottom left measurement at the sand. 230 par vs 125 par i'm expecting.
Notice the top measure 6 inches below the surface, at 420 par (nice). To me, that make sense vs what BRS seem to be saying i should expect of 203?
Anywho, the BRS video was 2 years ago, maybe something happened to AI Prime 16's LED tech that they're just much better now?
I'm planning on mostly softy/LPS on this tank, and hopefully 1 Colorado Sunburst sitting at the 320 area. But I don't quite know if my lighting is too high, or if i should trust these readings. My goal is not fiddle with my lights and mess up tank stability that way.
Do these measurements make sense for an HD prime using the BRS 70% settings?
Also attached is the BRS 70% settings which I replicated for my AI Prime. The fixture is 8" above the water line.
