Cannister filter

fab1971

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
2,255
Reaction score
21
Location
new jersey
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This might be a stupid question but I was using my cannister for my carbon, phosban and de-nitrate. Now that I'm getting into sps, I want to do things correctly and be more careful with my chemistry. Should I get rid of the cannister and buy a gfo unit? I saw one on brs with 2 chambers but doesn't the fluval do the same thing, except the flow can't be controlled. Is it neccessary to buy this or can I keep using the fluval?
 

Captain Nemo

Look Ma, it's Nemo!!
View Badges
Joined
Jun 10, 2010
Messages
2,057
Reaction score
13
Location
Georgia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You will be fine using the fluval, but if you wanted to use the BRS that is fine too. Either way you will be ok.
 

BlazinNano

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 26, 2009
Messages
2,095
Reaction score
1,489
Location
AltamonteSprings, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The 2 chamber reactor would be better. Gfo and carbon have different flow rates. Gfo needs to be tumbled all the time like it is boiling in the water and carbon should be a little slower so it has more contact time. If you have them in the canister they are getting the same flow. Plus gunk just sits in the bottom of the canister filter.
 
OP
OP
fab1971

fab1971

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
2,255
Reaction score
21
Location
new jersey
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The 2 chamber reactor would be better. Gfo and carbon have different flow rates. Gfo needs to be tumbled all the time like it is boiling in the water and carbon should be a little slower so it has more contact time. If you have them in the canister they are getting the same flow. Plus gunk just sits in the bottom of the canister filter.

That's what I was worried about. I'm trying to cut costs over here a little but I don't want it to be detrimental to the health of the sps and rest of my corals.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new