DOC questions

Oregon Grown Reef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 6, 2019
Messages
1,183
Reaction score
1,662
Location
Salem
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I've been reading about dissolved organic carbon, but I'll be the first to admit that I have no idea what I'm reading. What is doc, is it bad or good, and are there nutrient removal methods that are bad because they lower/raise them? For example, @Garf said this in another thread:
I ran a scrubber for 2 years, concluded the dissolved organics contribute to a coral algae phase shift. Not doing one again.
Is there a side to this hobby that I've been completely unaware of? From what Garf is insinuating (if I'm understanding correctly) , doc will change the colors of your corals if in too low/high demand. Does it also affect mortality rate?
 
I'd just move along. Multiple people asked him to elaborate and he never did.
The question isn't just posed to him, hence why I posted here. He's not even the first one that I saw say something like this. I'm honestly hoping @Randy Holmes-Farley will come in and dumb down the conversation to help me understand.
 
There’s loads about DOC on the web, I first came across it during my algal derived insomnia, a long time ago now, here’s one;

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/25779633.pdf
SUMMARY
The following collection of studies supports the idea that the microbial and macrobial community are strongly interrelated and subjected to positive feedback loops in which contribute to phase shifts from coral to algal dominance.
Microbes inhabiting coral surfaces are subjected to shifts in community composition and elevated activity in response to increased availability of algae derived DOM. This increased microbial activity, facilitated by bioavailable algae derived OM, has been identified as a key mechanism leading to coral mortality. First, Kuntz et al. (2005) and Kline et al. (2006) showed that elevated concentrations of organic compounds were more detrimental to coral health than increased availability of inorganic nutrients. Concurrently, Smith et al. (2006) conducted an empirical study which demonstrated that coral mortality was mediated by algal released dissolved compounds which induced microbe facilitated hypoxia. Supporting results have been provided by Barott et al. (2009) and a recent study by Morrow et al. (2012) who identified consistent patterns in physiology and microbial community differentiation across different types of coral-algal competitive interactions. Here turf- or macroalgae interactions with corals created a zone of hypoxia and altered pigmentation in the coral tissue. In the companion articles (Haas et al., 2010a; Haas et al., 2010b) we can provide the first direct visualization of oxygen gradients originating from corals and algae, as well as at the interfaces. The study shows 2 dimensional images of
Haas et al. (2013), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.108 21/28
oxygen gradients over time in varying flow conditions and can thereby provide compelling evidence for the existence of hypoxic zones in coral-algae interaction processes. By using oxygen optodes as biological sensors, Gregg et al., 2013, revealed that in these processes the source of DOC, rather than the microbial community is the driving factor for microbial oxygen drawdown.
On a larger scale Dinsdale et al. (2008) described an increase of the microbial density by an order of magnitude from islands dominated by hermatypic corals and coralline algae towards islands dominated by fleshy macro- and turf algae. This study also demonstrated that on islands with high cover of fleshy macro- and turf algae the microbial community was dominated by heterotrophs, including a large percentage of potential pathogens. Adding to this, Nelson et al. (2013) showed that, in contrast to coral exudates, which facilitated high microbial diversity with few virulence factors, macroalgal exudates selected for less diverse communities heavily enriched in copiotrophic lineages, containing pathogens with increased virulence factors.
 
There’s loads about DOC on the web, I first came across it during my algal derived insomnia, a long time ago now, here’s one;

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/25779633.pdf
SUMMARY
The following collection of studies supports the idea that the microbial and macrobial community are strongly interrelated and subjected to positive feedback loops in which contribute to phase shifts from coral to algal dominance.
Microbes inhabiting coral surfaces are subjected to shifts in community composition and elevated activity in response to increased availability of algae derived DOM. This increased microbial activity, facilitated by bioavailable algae derived OM, has been identified as a key mechanism leading to coral mortality. First, Kuntz et al. (2005) and Kline et al. (2006) showed that elevated concentrations of organic compounds were more detrimental to coral health than increased availability of inorganic nutrients. Concurrently, Smith et al. (2006) conducted an empirical study which demonstrated that coral mortality was mediated by algal released dissolved compounds which induced microbe facilitated hypoxia. Supporting results have been provided by Barott et al. (2009) and a recent study by Morrow et al. (2012) who identified consistent patterns in physiology and microbial community differentiation across different types of coral-algal competitive interactions. Here turf- or macroalgae interactions with corals created a zone of hypoxia and altered pigmentation in the coral tissue. In the companion articles (Haas et al., 2010a; Haas et al., 2010b) we can provide the first direct visualization of oxygen gradients originating from corals and algae, as well as at the interfaces. The study shows 2 dimensional images of
Haas et al. (2013), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.108 21/28
oxygen gradients over time in varying flow conditions and can thereby provide compelling evidence for the existence of hypoxic zones in coral-algae interaction processes. By using oxygen optodes as biological sensors, Gregg et al., 2013, revealed that in these processes the source of DOC, rather than the microbial community is the driving factor for microbial oxygen drawdown.
On a larger scale Dinsdale et al. (2008) described an increase of the microbial density by an order of magnitude from islands dominated by hermatypic corals and coralline algae towards islands dominated by fleshy macro- and turf algae. This study also demonstrated that on islands with high cover of fleshy macro- and turf algae the microbial community was dominated by heterotrophs, including a large percentage of potential pathogens. Adding to this, Nelson et al. (2013) showed that, in contrast to coral exudates, which facilitated high microbial diversity with few virulence factors, macroalgal exudates selected for less diverse communities heavily enriched in copiotrophic lineages, containing pathogens with increased virulence factors.
This is interesting. The doc released from the algae can cause higher rates of mortality? Mind blowing. Why is it that refugiums and other algae based nutrient export methods are so popular? It's better to run higher nutrients than to have low nutrients and chaeto. This is just not something you really hear or see. It seems water changes and a good skimmer keep them in check. Does activated carbon work as well?
 
I've been reading about dissolved organic carbon, but I'll be the first to admit that I have no idea what I'm reading. What is doc, is it bad or good, and are there nutrient removal methods that are bad because they lower/raise them? For example, @Garf said this in another thread:

Is there a side to this hobby that I've been completely unaware of? From what Garf is insinuating (if I'm understanding correctly) , doc will change the colors of your corals if in too low/high demand. Does it also affect mortality rate?
I can’t address the effect on coral.

Dissolved organic carbon measures many, many things and may not be a very useful metric. Triton’s NDOC test measures TOC, total organic carbon, which is DOC+POC (particulate organic carbon). Skimmers remove some DOC and some POC, granular activated carbon also removes some DOC. Aquariums tend to have more TOC than reefs and the ocean, but I am not sure the hobby has come to consensus on a “good” level. I think it comes back to not knowing what makes up DOC and whether what makes up DOC is wildly different among aquariums.

A side note. Nutritious DOC probably gets consumed rather quickly by bacteria. Maybe the stuff hanging around and being measured is useless junk that does nothing more than color aquarium the water yellow. Coral might not care about it,
 
@Garf

I think I may be experiencing in my system what you experienced with your coral and algae. I have a large system (~600 gallons) including a large display, frag tank and refugium with multiple types of macroalgae in it. The system is about 4 years old. The tank seemed to be on a positive trajectory for the first 3 years, with large Acropora and other SPS colonies forming.

In the past year I’ve had some colonies and frags start to go downhill with stn from the base. I’ve also had cyano creep into the display and refugium. Along with the cyano I’ve had Ulva and Dictyota macroalgae find their way into the cracks where the tangs/foxface can’t fully get to. The tangs and algae keep things trimmed but you can see tufts of the algae in every crack of rock in the display.

I’m wondering if this is causing increased DOC in my system thus feeding pathogenic algae and cyano.

In my connected frag tank, the frags really start to go down hill, stn, lose color quickly when the ulva starts taking over the frag racks. When I switch out the frag racks with clean ones the health of the frags rebound within a few days.

I’m fully convinced now that the macroalgae in my system is the reason for its decline, at least when the macroalgae is in close proximity to the coral.
 
@Garf

I think I may be experiencing in my system what you experienced with your coral and algae. I have a large system (~600 gallons) including a large display, frag tank and refugium with multiple types of macroalgae in it. The system is about 4 years old. The tank seemed to be on a positive trajectory for the first 3 years, with large Acropora and other SPS colonies forming.

In the past year I’ve had some colonies and frags start to go downhill with stn from the base. I’ve also had cyano creep into the display and refugium. Along with the cyano I’ve had Ulva and Dictyota macroalgae find their way into the cracks where the tangs/foxface can’t fully get to. The tangs and algae keep things trimmed but you can see tufts of the algae in every crack of rock in the display.

I’m wondering if this is causing increased DOC in my system thus feeding pathogenic algae and cyano.

In my connected frag tank, the frags really start to go down hill, stn, lose color quickly when the ulva starts taking over the frag racks. When I switch out the frag racks with clean ones the health of the frags rebound within a few days.

I’m fully convinced now that the macroalgae in my system is the reason for its decline, at least when the macroalgae is in close proximity to the coral.

Do you do anything to export organics? Skimming? GAC? Sponges? Purigen?
 
Do you do anything to export organics? Skimming? GAC? Sponges? Purigen?
I run an appropriate sized skimmer for the system but never ran GAC for the first 3.5 years. I started running carbon about 3 months ago, but I’m ramping up slowly as I think I shocked the system a bit at first. I do have some sponge growth in the dark nooks of my live rock but I’m now converting my refugium into a dark zone for more sponge growth. Also, 10% water changes every 2 weeks.
 
Last edited:
My solution for the algae in the display is to introduce money cowries and pitho crabs. We’ll see if it works.
 
IMG_4340.jpeg

Here is a piece of Porites that was growing 6 months ago before any of the ulva was there. Now it’s STNing as the ulva has crept in more every month.
 
I hope ulva is not going to be a problem in my tank as I grow a lot of it in my refugium and put it in the display for the fish to eat. If this is a real issue I might need to rethink that plan. C
 
IMG_4340.jpeg

Here is a piece of Porites that was growing 6 months ago before any of the ulva was there. Now it’s STNing as the ulva has crept in more every month.
Interestingly, Ulva mentioned in this paper appears to exude more hydrogen peroxide than most, which may inhibit bacterial growth;

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.934229/full
"Lastly and perhaps the least likely in this instance is the strong propensity of Ulva sp. for the production of secondary metabolites that display antimicrobial, antiherbivory, and antifouling properties, particularly as a by-product of photosynthesis (Nelson et al., 2003; Dobretsov et al., 2006; Lane and Kubanek, 2008; Twigg et al., 2020). In particular, Ulva sp. is known to release hydrogen peroxide in high concentrations (upwards of five times greater than other species) with in situ measurements showing that it inhibits bacterial production and carbon flow through the microbial loop by up to 75% (Twigg et al., 2020). As such, released hydrogen peroxide may have prevented DOC incorporation by bacteria via stunting bacterial growth. If this is the case, then released U. intestinalis DOC may represent a source of latent production once either the hydrogen peroxide has decayed (Petasne and Zika, 1997), or the DOC has been exported away from the system where it can be incorporated into the microbial loop"
 
Last edited:
Interestingly, Ulva mentioned in this paper appears to exude more hydrogen peroxide than most, which may inhibit bacterial growth;

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.934229/full
"Lastly and perhaps the least likely in this instance is the strong propensity of Ulva sp. for the production of secondary metabolites that display antimicrobial, antiherbivory, and antifouling properties, particularly as a by-product of photosynthesis (Nelson et al., 2003; Dobretsov et al., 2006; Lane and Kubanek, 2008; Twigg et al., 2020). In particular, Ulva sp. is known to release hydrogen peroxide in high concentrations (upwards of five times greater than other species) with in situ measurements showing that it inhibits bacterial production and carbon flow through the microbial loop by up to 75% (Twigg et al., 2020). As such, released hydrogen peroxide may have prevented DOC incorporation by bacteria via stunting bacterial growth. If this is the case, then released U. intestinalis DOC may represent a source of latent production once either the hydrogen peroxide has decayed (Petasne and Zika, 1997), or the DOC has been exported away from the system where it can be incorporated into the microbial loop"
Haha well I’m at a loss. But the Ulva definitely has a negative effect on the frags in my frag tank and I think it’s also contributing to issues in my display.
 
Haha well I’m at a loss. But the Ulva definitely has a negative effect on the frags in my frag tank and I think it’s also contributing to issues in my display.

I don't doubt that correlation may be true, but it may also be possible that ulva may be altering the water in other ways, such as depleting one or more trace elements.

As I have noted in many threads, the observation may be entirely correct, while the explanation (in this case doc) may not be.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT FIRST SPARKED YOUR INTEREST IN REEFING?

  • I saw a reef tank that hooked me

    Votes: 17 23.3%
  • I was already keeping freshwater aquariums

    Votes: 29 39.7%
  • A particular fish got me interested

    Votes: 10 13.7%
  • Corals and inverts were the draw

    Votes: 13 17.8%
  • A friend or family member introduced me

    Votes: 8 11.0%
  • The science and ecosystem challenge appealed to me

    Votes: 15 20.5%
  • I stumbled into it… and here we are

    Votes: 7 9.6%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 9 12.3%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new