Ecotech Radion G6?

Nonya

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
1,652
Reaction score
682
Location
Kalamazoo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
not likely. Shadowing and hard shimmer lines are the entire point of a kessil type light. Without a hybrid setup, there is no way to have your cake and eat it too. In a single unit, you will find yourself somewhere on the gradient of hard shadows and natural shimmer, and zero shimmer and no shading at all. Some lights have attempted to make both happen in one, but it has not been successful. They know exactly what they're offering at Kessil.
Some people favor adding T-5s to reduce shadowing and manage shimmer.
 

Superlightman

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 9, 2020
Messages
997
Reaction score
242
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
not likely. Shadowing and hard shimmer lines are the entire point of a kessil type light. Without a hybrid setup, there is no way to have your cake and eat it too. In a single unit, you will find yourself somewhere on the gradient of hard shadows and natural shimmer, and zero shimmer and no shading at all. Some lights have attempted to make both happen in one, but it has not been successful. They know exactly what they're offering at Kessil.
The red sea really surprised me in this way, it is not worse than my radions despite been a point source. But I still add t5 to the leds radions or others the results on corals are just better.
 

Superlightman

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 9, 2020
Messages
997
Reaction score
242
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As I was thinking this update is...
The good new for g4 users your ficture is a g6
Just found this comparison :
 

Attachments

  • 20220609_215147.jpg
    20220609_215147.jpg
    176.8 KB · Views: 278
  • 20220609_215128.jpg
    20220609_215128.jpg
    169.3 KB · Views: 256
  • 20220609_215052.jpg
    20220609_215052.jpg
    152.1 KB · Views: 265

Harold999

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 22, 2020
Messages
739
Reaction score
532
Location
The Hague NL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As I was thinking this update is...
The good new for g4 users your ficture is a g6
Just found this comparison :

Data provided by various people who didn't do the A/B comparison by themselves? So not sure about this.

By the way, where are all the user reviews of the new G6 here on this forum? Very, very quiet...
 
Last edited:

Superlightman

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 9, 2020
Messages
997
Reaction score
242
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Data provided by various people who didn't do the A/B comparison by themselves? So not sure about this.

By the way, where are all the user reviews of the new G6 here on this forum? Very, very quiet...
The publication has been done by a famous lighting specialist, he knows what he says .
 

areefer01

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 28, 2021
Messages
2,665
Reaction score
2,721
Location
Ca
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
says right in the image. Telegraham.

He has write ups and data on tons of lights.

get out from under your rock. Just teasing :)

Missed it as I only saw the larger FB post/delete thus me asking.

As far as teasing goes - all good :)
 

oreo54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
5,601
Reaction score
3,447
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
But what does the native G6 blue spectrum look like? Those are AB+ profile.
Of course they also omit whether
1) Output of the diodes is increased (next gen?)
2) Completely different distribution (new optics)
You know.. the important stuff.. ;)
Anyway
 
Last edited:

Jon's Reef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
987
Location
Madison, WI
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
But how does that plot make sense?
1654876182195.png


G5 Pro: 32 Royal/16 Blue
G6 Pro: 32 Royal/16 Blue
Why would the Blue peak drop from ~70% to 45% if the diode ratio is the same?
Other possible convolutions in that range:
Cool White: 24 --> 16
Green: 6 --> 6

The increase in 430 is clearly seen on the left shoulder.

By the diode mix tweak, the G6 should show a much broader 400-500 nm peak (the discrepancy in expectation vs reality between G5 to G6 Blue is even larger)
 

Nonya

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
1,652
Reaction score
682
Location
Kalamazoo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes, it was intentionally vague and intended to be poking fun at Ecotech making extraordinary claims about the coverage of their lights and each "new" generation being orders of magnitude better than the last. It's just like the new phone of the week. Not saying that Ecotech is alone in this type of marketing.
It's called salesmanship.
 

Nonya

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
1,652
Reaction score
682
Location
Kalamazoo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
But how does that plot make sense?
1654876182195.png


G5 Pro: 32 Royal/16 Blue
G6 Pro: 32 Royal/16 Blue
Why would the Blue peak drop from ~70% to 45% if the diode ratio is the same?
Other possible convolutions in that range:
Cool White: 24 --> 16
Green: 6 --> 6

The increase in 430 is clearly seen on the left shoulder.

By the diode mix tweak, the G6 should show a much broader 400-500 nm peak (the discrepancy in expectation vs reality between G5 to G6 Blue is even larger)
You'd have to compare apples to apples. I'm pretty sure the whites contribute to the blue spectrum because white LEDs are blue with a white phosphor. Second, I believe the blue LEDs could be running at different wattages, especially the Gen 4s. Also, Gen6 Pros have the addition of 395nm.
 

telegraham

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 20, 2017
Messages
442
Reaction score
600
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
the G6 should show a much broader 400-500 nm peak
There are three differences that stand out to me. The optics are silly wide. That improves the BRS glass box test results, but may not translate to a better look in a hobbyists tank. That, and over the same area, the available PAR is reduced. Second is the inclusion of 395ish nm. That reverses the years of "UV" marketing. This is the first production Radion actually to have a UV diode. Regardless of what the sliders state, the others offered violet and above. Last is the 6's 430nm addition vs the 4's 415nm. That's an interesting move that might not satisfy the lovers of the 4's deep violet.

If you're not expecting a huge difference, then the broader range you mentioned is there, but it happens to be in the 395-500 range. Regarding 400-500 range, that can't be broader as it's 400-500. Can's stretch spectrum, but maybe you mean relative spectrum intensities. If that's the case, you do point to the interesting loss of 470 (Windex color) in the Gen 6. That's real.

All peaks are relative to the others and the data were captured using the same model spectrometer that BRS uses.
 

Jon's Reef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
987
Location
Madison, WI
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
All peaks are relative to the others and the data were captured using the same model spectrometer that BRS uses.
Not questioning your spectrometer (or BRS's measurements). I am wondering if there is a deeper issue (firmware or hardware driver) which doesn't allow the full potential.
 

telegraham

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 20, 2017
Messages
442
Reaction score
600
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Not questioning your spectrometer (or BRS's measurements). I am wondering if there is a deeper issue (firmware or hardware driver) which doesn't allow the full potential.
Didn't take it as a challenge, and shared for transparency. I'd be surprised if it's not just a power balancing/temperature management thing. Regardless, for those who like the ATI Blue Plus/Gen 4 Windex option, adding 470nm to a reef is super easy.
 

Creating a strong bulwark: Did you consider floor support for your reef tank?

  • I put a major focus on floor support.

    Votes: 20 44.4%
  • I put minimal focus on floor support.

    Votes: 10 22.2%
  • I put no focus on floor support.

    Votes: 14 31.1%
  • Other.

    Votes: 1 2.2%
Back
Top