Hanna Accuracy v. ICP

Ian Baxter

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 4, 2019
Messages
686
Reaction score
180
Location
San Diego
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I recently got my ICP test results back from ATI and noticed that some of my Hanna checkers are close in results and other's far off. I know there could be procedure error or dirty cuvettes on my part, but my checker numbers have remained consistant and I test weekly. For future testing, should I just subtract or add the approximate difference between them below (Ca, NO3, P)? I also had the same issue with salinity. They said 32.33 which converts to 1.0243, but my refractometer is at 1.026.

ATI Hanna Aprox. Difference
KH - 8.85 8.4
Ca - 421.3 527 -100
Mg - 1363 1365
NO3 - 60.79 40 +20
P/PO4 - 32.24/.1 51/.16 -20/-.05
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,247
Reaction score
92,274
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The Hanna calcium seems to be the most problematic of the Hanna kits. Most folks give up on it.

Phosphate, if just by ICP of P can detect a wider range of chemicals than kits and may be higher for that reason.

How did you calibrate the refractometer?
 
OP
OP
Ian Baxter

Ian Baxter

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 4, 2019
Messages
686
Reaction score
180
Location
San Diego
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The Hanna calcium seems to be the most problematic of the Hanna kits. Most folks give up on it.

Phosphate, if just by ICP of P can detect a wider range of chemicals than kits and may be higher for that reason.

How did you calibrate the refractometer?
I might go back to Salifert for Ca

The ICP also gave PO4 at .1

I used RODI for the calibration but was reading your article yesterday on how to make the calibration solution. That's going to be my plan.
 

John Neuzil

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
1,522
Reaction score
1,506
Location
Crossville, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have used ATI icp three or four times over the past few months and they listed my salinity at 33 each time. My Tropic marin hydrometer and my refractomer were at 35 or 1.026.
I just started up with the Triton subscription and their
icp reported my sality at 35 matching my results.
 
Last edited:

Lasse

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
12,660
Reaction score
31,347
Location
Källarliden 14 D Bohus, Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As phosphate - many ICP vendors do not measure PO4 - just transfer the P readings from the ICP to PO4. I do not know how ATI does. I use OCEAMO and they analys PO4 with photometric methods. Both the OES kit and MS kit include a 0.2 µm filter for the phosphate sample and the MS also include a stabilisator for the PO4 sample. I use my ICP-MS kits reported PO4 concentrations as the real measurement. My Hanna Marin Master is normally not even close sometimes.

Sincerely Lasse
 
OP
OP
Ian Baxter

Ian Baxter

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 4, 2019
Messages
686
Reaction score
180
Location
San Diego
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have used ATI icp three or four times over the past few months and they listed my salinity at 33 each time. My Tropic marin hydrometer and my refractomer were at 36 or 1.026.
I just started up with the Triton subscription and their
icp reported my sality at 36 matching my results.
That’s very interesting and good to know. My Apex probe was also reading at 36–37. What test kit do you use for the rest of your parameters? I’m curious to see if the triton test is much different than the ATI.
 
OP
OP
Ian Baxter

Ian Baxter

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 4, 2019
Messages
686
Reaction score
180
Location
San Diego
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As phosphate - many ICP vendors do not measure PO4 - just transfer the P readings from the ICP to PO4. I do not know how ATI does. I use OCEAMO and they analys PO4 with photometric methods. Both the OES kit and MS kit include a 0.2 µm filter for the phosphate sample and the MS also include a stabilisator for the PO4 sample. I use my ICP-MS kits reported PO4 concentrations as the real measurement. My Hanna Marin Master is normally not even close sometimes.

Sincerely Lasse
I use the Hanna phosphorus checker and was surprised at how much difference there was. I’ve been battling prospects for quite a while now and using Rowaphos to bring it down and I would hate to bottom it out, so I don’t know which one would be more accurate. I would assume it would be the ICP test.
 

John Neuzil

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
1,522
Reaction score
1,506
Location
Crossville, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
That’s very interesting and good to know. My Apex probe was also reading at 36–37. What test kit do you use for the rest of your parameters? I’m curious to see if the triton test is much different than the ATI.
Hanna for everything except magnesium. Magnesium is Salifert. I just purchased a Milwaukee salinity meter which i really like. Matches my hydrometer and refractomer.
 

ReneReef

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 9, 2018
Messages
312
Reaction score
369
Location
The Netherlands
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hanna for everything except magnesium. Magnesium is Salifert. I just purchased a Milwaukee salinity meter which i really like. Matches my hydrometer and refractomer.
According to your earlier post, your hydrometer and refractometer did not match. So this can’t be correct.

A salinity of 36 ppt matches with an S.G. of 1.0271 not 1.026.

The device to trust is the one calibrated with a reliable reference.
 

Lasse

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
12,660
Reaction score
31,347
Location
Källarliden 14 D Bohus, Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would assume it would be the ICP test
I do not know how ATI calculate the phosphate - if they use photometric methods, if you have to filter the sample and if they send with a stabilizer - but I know that OCEAMO´s way of have you to prepare the sample (with the ICP-MS package) and the way they analyze it is by the book. hence I rely on their result.

Sincerely Lasse
 

John Neuzil

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
1,522
Reaction score
1,506
Location
Crossville, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
According to your earlier post, your hydrometer and refractometer did not match. So this can’t be correct.

A salinity of 36 ppt matches with an S.G. of 1.0271 not 1.026.

The device to trust is the one calibrated with a reliable reference.
Your absolutely correct. Old fingers miss typed. 35ppm is correct. I fixed it. Thanks for pointing that out
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 36 27.3%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 34.1%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 29 22.0%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 12 9.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.6%
Back
Top