Head and Lateral Line Erosion (HLLE)

Activated Carbon as a Cause of Head and Lateral Line Erosion (HLLE) in Marine Aquarium fish

Jay Hemdal
c. 2020
Background:

Head and Lateral Line Erosion (HLLE) is the name for a type of skin erosion that affects some species of marine fishes in captivity. It is occasionally referred to as Marine Head and Lateral Line Erosion (MHLLE) or Head and Lateral Line Erosion Syndrome (HLLES). A similar syndrome occurs in freshwater fishes, but the causes seem to be different, and that is usually termed, “Hole-in-the-Head” disease. HLLE typically begins as small pale pits around the fish’s eyes. These may develop into light colored lesions along the fish’s lateral line system, finally spreading onto wider areas of the body and sometimes involving the unpaired fins. Fish that develop severe lesions are usually permanently disfigured. At least 20 families of fish have been identified as having developed HLLE in captivity (Table 1). Not all species of fish show the same symptoms, and do not always develop lesions to the same degree (Hemdal 2006). HLLE is not normally seen in fish in the wild, but there are two published photographs that bring this into question; one taken by Rudie Kuiter in the Cook Islands shows HLLE in a large black tang, Zebrasoma rostratum and another image taken by Tim Laman in Bali shows minor HLLE pitting in a juvenile emperor angelfish, Pomacanthus imperator.

1 hlle.png

Table I. - Families of fishes with members known to be susceptible to HLLE-like lesions in aquariums (J. Hemdal - personal observation).

hlle.jpg

Paracanthurus hepatus with HLLE photo by @blkspade

A similar condition, termed “epithelial thinning”, has been noted in walleye, grouper and hepatus blue tangs (other species may likely develop this as well). This syndrome is characterized by thinning of the skin on the head, often with a change to a paler color. Sometimes, but not always, this can evolve into classic, deep-pit HLLE. The cause of this issue has not been determined.

Causes of HLLE:

To date, the cause(s) of this syndrome have not been identified in aquarium fish through published scientific study, although conjecture and informal studies abound. This report is based in part on a peer-reviewed study that was published in the North American Journal of Aquaculture (Hemdal and Odum 2011). That paper evaluates the relationship between the use of activated carbon in aquariums and the development of HLLE in surgeonfish. The results of an additional dietary study, not part of the original research is included here, but that material is offered only as preliminary results as it was not peer-reviewed.

In 2009, a survey was taken of 100 advanced aquarists who identified twenty-five suspected causes for HLLE in marine fishes. The majority of the survey participants believed that HLLE in marine fishes such as tangs and angelfish is caused by a dietary problem, notably deficiencies in vitamin C or low levels of highly unsaturated fatty acids. General stress caused by captivity also was cited as a major cause of HLLE. Other survey responses included stray electrical current, the use of copper medications, heavy metal toxicity, lack of sunlight, the use of activated carbon or the presence of a variety of chemical pollutants all as possible causes of HLLE. Viral and bacterial infections have also been implicated in causing this syndrome (Varner 1991, Hemdal 1989). In the survey results, 18 treatment methods were reported to have caused remission of HLLE symptoms in fishes. Eighty-four percent of these cases involved moving the fish to a new aquarium as one part of the treatment. This shows that there are conditions in the physical operation of the aquarium itself that can be changed in order to reduce the incidence of HLLE. When the survey results were limited to professional public aquarists, 19% of the respondents found complete reversal of HLLE by discontinuing the use of carbon filtration. In addition, 75% of this sub-group stated that they felt that the use of carbon caused HLLE in at least some cases.

Tom Frakes wrote a report in a 1988 SeaScope about a roundtable discussion at the second International Aquarium Congress where George Blasiola was presenting a paper implicating improper diet as causing HLLE. Towards the end of the article, and with no real discussion, mention is made of a Dr. Dieter Jauch of the Wilhelma Aquarium who expressed his opinion that carbon use caused HLLE. Tom Frakes also performed a small-scale study that was not published, but which implicated carbon use in causing HLLE in some damselfish (Frakes pers. comm. 2010).

Current study:

The history of activated carbon use at the Toledo Zoo has shown a correlation between the use of lignite (coal-based) carbon and the formation of HLLE lesions in some fishes. 3 Moving the fish to aquariums without carbon filtration sometimes caused the lesions to heal without additional treatment. Once carbon use at the facility was curtailed over ten years ago, cases of HLLE greatly diminished.

Based on those preliminary observations, the Toledo Zoo funded this study, the objective of which was to demonstrate the relationship between carbon use and the development of HLLE. In turn, it is hoped that these results will allow marine aquarists to make more informed decisions regarding the use of carbon in their aquariums.

Three 120-gallon marine aquarium systems (two tanks per system) were established using typical home aquarium equipment and synthetic seawater. Live rock was utilized as the basis for biological filtration in all three systems. Thirty-five ocean surgeonfish, (Acanthurus bahianus) were evenly distributed among the three systems at the start of the study.

Because there have been so many purported causes of HLLE, it was very important to control variables that relate to any of the suspected causes. For example: The test fish were not exposed to natural sunlight, and light levels were maintained between 54 and 323 Lux. This was to eliminate “sunlight” and other bright light sources that have been reported to reduce the incidence of HLLE. Voltage between the aquariums and a common ground was monitored with a voltmeter, to be very low, ranging between 0.2- and 1-Volt AC. This helped rule out spurious voltage as a cause. The air supply was passed through a HEPA filter, as “dust” has been implicated as an irritant, possibly causing HLLE (more about carbon dust later). The study fish were net-collected by a professional fish collector and not exposed to carbon or copper prior to their arrival. The water quality in all systems was maintained within parameters considered acceptable by Stephen Spotte (Spotte 1979).

2 hlle.png

Water changes were performed on each system at a rate of 45% per month. This maintained nitrate-nitrogen levels below 10 ppm (High nitrate levels are another suspected cause of HLLE). Small amounts of water, (~3 milliliters) were transferred between all three systems on a weekly basis. The intent was to demonstrate that there were no easily communicable fish diseases present in one system and not another. Because a reovirus has been associated with HLLE lesions in marine angelfish (Varner and Lewis 1991), and a possible correlation shown between bacterial diseases and HLLE, (Hemdal 1989) it was important not to restrict the potential transport of disease organisms between the test and control systems. The most difficult variable to control was that of diet. So many people believe that poor diet is the root 4 cause of HLLE, that any study that does not control this variable will be suspect. Because the fish in each of the three systems could be further split into two groups, it was decided to feed half of the fish in each system a premium pelleted diet known not to induce HLLE (Tilghman, et-al 2003) and the other half, a bulk flake food, that was known to at least not prevent HLLE. Once acclimated to these diets, the study fish were not given any other foods or supplements.

One week after the fish arrived, 500 grams of unwashed lignite carbon was placed in a mesh bag and added to the filter sump of the first system. At the same time, 500 g of extruded pellet carbon was placed in a mesh bag and added to the filter sump of the second system. No carbon was added to the control system. Two months later, the carbon in the first and second systems was supplemented with an additional 500 grams of each variety. This carbon usage follows the recommendation made by Spotte (1979), of 1 gram of carbon per liter, changed every two months.

Study results

Minor HLLE lesions were noted on two fish 20 days after the lignite carbon was added to the sump of their system. The lesions began to develop on the additional fish in that system, and grew in size until after four months, all of the fish in that system showed severe lesions (Eventually involving over one third of their body surface). One fish of this group died, but this was attributed, (at least in part) to tank mate aggression.

The 12 fish exposed to pelleted carbon did not develop visible symptoms, but microscopic lesions were discovered upon histological examination by an outside laboratory, and two of the fish developed minor lesions a few months after the conclusion of the study. The 11 control fish did not develop any visible or microscopic lesions. Six months after the study was concluded, and the carbon was removed, the HLLE lesions remain on all originally affected fish, and the control fish are all still symptom-free.

The effect of lignite carbon on the fish was swift and involved all of the exposed fish. None of the control fish developed any lesions. Statistically, the results were definitive that activated carbon use caused HLLE in these fish.

Discussion


The basic hypothesis of this study was that activated carbon causes HLLE in fishes. Originally, it was thought that carbon dust (known as fines) was the causative agent. This was based on observations at the Toledo Zoo where carbon was removed from an aquarium and the water changed, yet HLLE symptoms could still be produced by adding susceptible fish to the aquarium, indicating there was some unknown residual action by the carbon. Carbon fines were frequently discovered in the filter sumps and substrate of these tanks. Changing all of the aquarium’s water, decorations and substrate would then render the aquarium safe for housing susceptible fishes (Assuming no new carbon use). Two public aquariums have reported acute outbreaks of HLLE in systems where carbon had been accidentally ground up and ejected into aquariums by mechanical filtration systems. It has also been reported that aquariums which use foam fractionators (Protein skimmers) do not seem to develop HLLE as frequently, even when carbon is routinely used. Since foam fractionators remove particulate organic carbon from water (including carbon fines), it was thought that this might be why these systems do not cause HLLE as readily. In addition, the hard pelleted carbon used in this study did not cause severe HLLE, while the soft, dusty carbon did. However, no carbon fines were seen in the histological 5 examinations of the lesions of the study fish. This means that the dust causing the effect is either fleeting, the fines were too small for the histologist to see, or that there is some other factor associated with carbon use that causes HLLE in susceptible fishes.

When these results were informally presented to home aquarists, some would mention their own cases that confirmed the relationship between carbon and HLLE, but other aquarists would steadfastly argue against the conclusions. Some of these home aquarists have used carbon filtration products for years with no problem. Public aquarists as a whole are much more familiar with the cause and effect of carbon and HLLE. Why the difference in experiences? It may be due to home aquarists often opting to purchase high quality carbon products, while public aquarists, needing huge amounts of carbon, and often purchase bulk commercial brands. It may also be that home aquarists just never suspected that such a commonly used filtration material could be at the root of the HLLE issue.

Diet Study:

After the HLLE project was concluded, a post-study pilot project was undertaken to see what long-term effects severe HLLE lesions might have on the health of the fish. All of the remaining study fish were held in their respective tanks after the carbon was removed. Monthly 45% water changes continued. For ninety-five days, each tank continued to be fed the same diet (premium pellets or basic flakes) and the fish were sedated, measured and weighed four times over three months. All food fed to the fish was weighed, and the fish were fed three to four times per day in appropriate amounts. Feeding amounts were approximately 1.5% of the fish’s body weight in food per day. Both foods had the same percentage moisture (10%) so direct comparison was easily made.

Using a formula: K = fish weight in grams * 100 / Length in centimeters3 the average condition factor K was determined for each group of fish. Condition factor is used by fisheries scientists to determine how “robust” a particular group of fish is. A lower number indicates a thinner, poor condition fish, while a higher number shows that the fish is healthier, and in better condition. Of course, extremely high numbers can indicate obesity.

Condition factor numbers cannot easily be compared between species, or even between different age fish of the same species, but these numbers can be used to show relative differences in condition between groups of similar fish. The condition factors for surgeonfish in the wild ranges from 3 to around 4. The range of “K” in the study fish was 2.584 to 3.882. The fish fed the premium pelleted food had a higher average condition factor (3.354) than the fish fed the generic flake food (3.047). More importantly, the control fish not exposed to carbon had a higher condition factor (3.280) than the fish with severe HLLE (3.088). The fish exposed to pelleted carbon were intermediate (3.235). This shows that HLLE causes systemic health problems in fish, and is not a purely cosmetic issue. While this does seem intuitive (after all, fish with HLLE do look very sick) it has not been demonstrated before, that HLLE has any direct effect on a fish’s health.

Conclusion:

The recommendation based on the clear effect that the use of carbon had on the study fish is not to use activated lignite carbon in marine aquariums housing fish species susceptible to HLLE. Other means of water quality management should first be explored; water changes, noncarbon chemical filtration, or foam fractionation. Extruded pelleted carbon may be more 6 suitable, especially if used sparingly. No conclusions can be drawn regarding the use of carbon filtration products that were not tested.

If you do use carbon, rinse it well in reverse osmosis water prior to use, employ a foam fractionator, and do not place the carbon in a high water flow reactor (that might serve to break the carbon granules up into finer particles).

References:

Hemdal, J.F. 1989. A reported case of head and lateral line erosion (HLLE), potentially caused by a bacterial infection in a marine angelfish. Drum and Croaker. Volume 22, No.3.

Hemdal, J.F. 2006. Advanced Marine Aquarium Techniques. 352pp. TFH Publications, Neptune City, New Jersey.

Hemdal, J.F. 2010. HLLE and Activated Carbon: Looking for a Link. Coral Magazine 7(3):12- 14

Hemdal, J.F. 2011. HLLE and a smoking gun. Coral 8(4):90-95

Hemdal, J.F. Odum, R.A. 2011. The Role of Activated Lignite Carbon in the Development of Head and Lateral Line Erosion in the Ocean Surgeonfish. North American Journal of Aquaculture 73:4, 489-492

Spotte, S. 1979. Fish and Invertebrate Culture. 179pp. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York.

Stamper et-al. 2011. Effects of Full‐Stream Carbon Filtration on the Development of Head and Lateral Line Erosion Syndrome (HLLES) in Ocean Surgeon. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health.

Tilghman, G.C., Francis-Floyd, R. and Klinger, R. 2003 Captive nutritional management of herbivorous reef fish using surgeonfish (Acanthuridae) as a model. In: Marine ornamental species: collection, culture, & conservation. Cato, J.C. and Brown, C.L. editors. Wiley-Blackwell Publishers.

Varner, P.W. and Lewis, D.H. 1991. Characterization of a virus associated with head and lateral line erosion syndrome in marine angelfish. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 3:198-205.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
Jay Hemdal

Jay Hemdal

7500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jul 31, 2020
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
8,379
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Dundee
Is ROX carbon considered to cause HLLE?
I don’t have any reports about problems with that, so I’m pretty confident that it is ok to use.
Jay
 

craigbuss

Community Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jun 6, 2020
Messages
86
Reaction score
86
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
I use ROX.. and have 9 tangs... not a single one has HLLE. None of my tangs smoke cigarettes either.. so not sure how that factors in.
how large is your tank? I wonder if it is possible for the tank size compared to the way carbon is used (media reactor/mesh bag) to play a factor. I have a 120gal tank and use the BRS dual reactor for carbon and GFO.
 

pdxmonkeyboy

Sticks!! Give me the sticks!
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 7, 2017
Messages
2,657
Reaction score
4,494
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Hockinson, WA
About 800 total gallons. I am convinced it is the carbon dust that causes the problem. Rox is as dust free as you can possibly get.

Think about it.. carbon doesn't add anything to the water, it simply takes things away and it is not like carbon zaps the tank of essentially nutrients or minerals.
 

friendlyguy

Community Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 22, 2020
Messages
78
Reaction score
65
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Thanks for the article! I`ve read it with great interest as i have a zebrasoma that suffers from HLLE.
I bought the fish like that, the LFS told me its scars from a fight with another fish during transport and that they will heal "just fine"... Much later(a couple of months) I began to wonder why its wounds don't heal at all and I think I even observed the condition getting worse. :eek: I did read about HLLE but only saw an (very) old paper where the use of active carbon was "suspected" as well as an diet. Since I feed my fish frozen food twice every day and nothing else. I thought that it might be the non exiting variance in food and began to add vitamines, tried to offer fresh food as well and added garlic to the food. (soaking krill / mysis / artemia in it)
I watched the fish closely and thought at first that it got better, "maybe" the scars did heal a bit... but not that much.
Now... I do also use activated carbon since day 1 of my tank. I do wash it thoroughly before i use it and I only buy it from "high quality" brands like sangokai or nyos. However, as I just learned its probably a lot of it and its used in a high flow filter. (nyos torq) I use roughly 500g on a 350 liter system. Exchanging it maybe every 2 months or so.
I think the next step is to remove it entirely from my filtration and see if that helps.

EDIT: I believe I even read an article where it was stated that the only "proven" cause for HLLE is captivity.
 
Last edited:
OP
Jay Hemdal

Jay Hemdal

7500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jul 31, 2020
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
8,379
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Dundee
Thanks for the article! I`ve read it with great interest as i have a zebrasoma that suffers from HLLE.
I bought the fish like that, the LFS told me its scars from a fight with another fish during transport and that they will heal "just fine"... Much later(a couple of months) I began to wonder why its wounds don't heal at all and I think I even observed the condition getting worse. :eek: I did read about HLLE but only saw an (very) old paper where the use of active carbon was "suspected" as well as an diet. Since I feed my fish frozen food twice every day and nothing else. I thought that it might be the non exiting variance in food and began to add vitamines, tried to offer fresh food as well and added garlic to the food. (soaking krill / mysis / artemia in it)
I watched the fish closely and thought at first that it got better, "maybe" the scars did heal a bit... but not that much.
Now... I do also use activated carbon since day 1 of my tank. I do wash it thoroughly before i use it and I only buy it from "high quality" brands like sangokai or nyos. However, as I just learned its probably a lot of it and its used in a high flow filter. (nyos torq) I use roughly 500g on a 350 liter system. Exchanging it maybe every 2 months or so.
I think the next step is to remove it entirely from my filtration and see if that helps.

EDIT: I believe I even read an article where it was stated that the only "proven" cause for HLLE is captivity.

Removing carbon after HLLE has begun does not always resolve the issue. It seems that once the lesions become severe enough, they are mostly permanent. Good luck though!

Jay
 
OP
Jay Hemdal

Jay Hemdal

7500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jul 31, 2020
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
8,379
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Dundee
Is it a coincidence that the family of fishes most susceptible to HLLE is also the most susceptible to protozoan parasitism?
There is definitely a correlation between HLLE and skin/scale type. There are some species though, that are very susceptible to protozoan infections (anthias and boxfish for example) that don't develop HLLE.

Jay
 

brwaldbaum

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Mar 24, 2018
Messages
156
Reaction score
86
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Long Island
There is definitely a correlation between HLLE and skin/scale type. There are some species though, that are very susceptible to protozoan infections (anthias and boxfish for example) that don't develop HLLE.

Jay
Have you ever run carbon in series with a diatom or micron cartridge filter? If so, did the fish still develop HLLE?
 

capted

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Aug 18, 2016
Messages
108
Reaction score
86
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
This guy recovered pretty good after a bad case of It but you can see the permanent scares around the eyes. I do run carbon (seachem matrix) Didn't get better or worse when I removed the carbon. I did notice my nitrates were above 80 when he started to get it bad. Maybe stress related?
 

Attachments

  • 20210507_232326.jpg
    20210507_232326.jpg
    227.6 KB · Views: 23
OP
Jay Hemdal

Jay Hemdal

7500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jul 31, 2020
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
8,379
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Dundee
Have you ever run carbon in series with a diatom or micron cartridge filter? If so, did the fish still develop HLLE?
No, I never studied that. In my study, I used a micron air filter in order to rule out airborne particulates that might be entering the aquarium through that route (carbon dust versus "normal" dust). Anecdotally though, many people see that tanks with some means to actively reduce particulate organic carbon (POC) show fewer issues with carbon use - the big POC remover is a good protein skimmer running very wet. An additional way that POC is removed from systems is through uptake by filter feeding inverts.

Jay
 
OP
Jay Hemdal

Jay Hemdal

7500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jul 31, 2020
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
8,379
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Dundee
That is a thought. From my own experience either stray voltage or (dirty) water has a big affect. Not to start the voltage issue.
Ah, I've ruled out stray voltage as a cause many years ago. I'm not sure why it keeps coming up, but there is no causation. I tried, but never was able to induce it (pardon the pun).

Jay
 

capted

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Aug 18, 2016
Messages
108
Reaction score
86
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Ah, I've ruled out stray voltage as a cause many years ago. I'm not sure why it keeps coming up, but there is no causation. I tried, but never was able to induce it (pardon the pun).

Jay
Good to know that. I had a small voltage reading that I didn't know for how long so I wasn't sure about that
 

pfoxgrover

Active Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Sep 7, 2012
Messages
193
Reaction score
88
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Lancaster, CA
So what is the best alternative to running activated carbon with tangs?
I did some looking into ozone and just about everybody recommends that you run both the air and water leaving the reactor/skimmer through carbon afterwards so what would the point be there?
I have rox on hand and switched to it a few years ago. Two of my tangs look really bad and in my new tank I will have 8 tangs and a lot of water to look through to see them.
 
OP
Jay Hemdal

Jay Hemdal

7500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jul 31, 2020
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
8,379
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Dundee
Have you ever run carbon in series with a diatom or micron cartridge filter? If so, did the fish still develop HLLE?
Sorry - I missed your post. I have NOT tried using a diatom filter to remove carbon dust, but anecdotally, tanks that have a good way to remove POC (particulate Organic Carbon) also seem to have fewer issues with HLLE. Two POC export mechanisms that *seem* to help are protein skimmers running really wet, and then, reef tanks that have corals and other inverts that tend to remove POC. In both these cases, HLLE seems to be less of an issue, regardless of carbon use (unless the carbon is dusty/soft or used in a reactor). Well rinsed pelleted carbon, used sparingly in a good reef system isn't much of a problem.

Jay
 
OP
Jay Hemdal

Jay Hemdal

7500 Club Member
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
View Badges
Joined
Jul 31, 2020
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
8,379
Review score
+0 /0 /-0
Location
Dundee
@Jay Hemdal Can you comment on my last post? I am interested in what you think good tang safe alternatives to activated carbon for the purpose of water clarity?
Sorry, missed your post, please see my post above for my opinion.

Jay
 

Speaking of your latest coral purchase...

  • It was a GREAT deal

    Votes: 98 36.0%
  • It was a good deal

    Votes: 88 32.4%
  • It was nether good nor bad

    Votes: 65 23.9%
  • It was a bad deal

    Votes: 17 6.3%
  • Other (please explain)

    Votes: 4 1.5%
TSM Aquatics
Top