How long do you run your carbon reactor?

Reef Jedi

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 21, 2018
Messages
1,663
Reaction score
4,026
Location
Erie, CO
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I’ve been researching and debating running my carbon reactor 24/7 vs a timed schedule. I’ve been reading that it’s not necessary to run it all the time and scheduling a couple hours a day works just as well but allows you to run the carbon longer without having to change it out as often. I have the BRS small reactor and I’m using Rox .8 carbon.

I wanted to get the community’s experience and thoughts on what works for you and what doesn’t.
 

56longroof

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 23, 2023
Messages
2,896
Reaction score
6,115
Location
Durham Missouri USA
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
24/7. My thinking is the waste is accumulating 24/7. It really doesn't take alot of the Rox per gallon so the cost saving would be minimal. There are other areas alot more feasible to cut costs in my opinion.
 

X-37B

Fight The Good Fight
View Badges
Joined
Jul 3, 2017
Messages
14,076
Reaction score
23,052
Location
The Outer Limits
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have ran carbon in a reactor 24/7
when running a no3 reactor. I have used a dedicated media reactor many times before also.
I now find that carbon in a nylon bag is my preferred method for the use of carbon.
It's simple to employ and change when needed.
I run carbon 24/7 in all systems and generally follow the rox recommended amounts.
 
OP
OP
Reef Jedi

Reef Jedi

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 21, 2018
Messages
1,663
Reaction score
4,026
Location
Erie, CO
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have ran carbon in a reactor 24/7
when running a no3 reactor. I have used a dedicated media reactor many times before also.
I now find that carbon in a nylon bag is my preferred method for the use of carbon.
It's simple to employ and change when needed.
I run carbon 24/7 in all systems and generally follow the rox recommended amounts.
Curious why you went back to a bag? I switched from the bag system on the rollermat tray and moved to a dedicated reactor. I know water needs to be forced over all surfaces of the carbon to be most effective but do you think your turn over rate is slow enough to allow that longer contact time?
 

X-37B

Fight The Good Fight
View Badges
Joined
Jul 3, 2017
Messages
14,076
Reaction score
23,052
Location
The Outer Limits
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Curious why you went back to a bag? I switched from the bag system on the rollermat tray and moved to a dedicated reactor. I know water needs to be forced over all surfaces of the carbon to be most effective but do you think your turn over rate is slow enough to allow that longer contact time?
Turnover rate I'm my sump is around 2-3x system volume of 150g's.
I got tired of changing the reactor out so I went back to bags. I see no real difference either way.
Most of the water goes over/through the bag in my 2 IM ext's. This is more efficient than dropping it one of the 400 micron mesh bags, imo.
As you can see in the pic overflow water passes over and through the carbon bag. If I drop on into a mesh bag it gets coated pretty fast with debris. I run gfo the same way when needed.
20250608_095245.jpg
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,263
Reaction score
92,314
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I do not see the desirability of anything except 24/7. Stagnant water in a reactor is not a desirable thing.

One can use as much or as little as you want. If you believe you do not need a lot, don’t use a lot.

I currently use GAC passively is a mesh bag that is part of my Tunze skimmer. I use ROX 0.8, and plan to swap it out every couple of weeks.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 38 27.3%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 47 33.8%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 30 21.6%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 14 10.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.2%
Back
Top