Hydros Launch vs Start

BeanAnimal

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
9,274
Reaction score
15,564
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I monitor salinity and pH. I see no need to look
At pH (really ever). I think you need to decide why you want a controller before you invest in a controller. The upgrade is moot if you never upgrade and the upfront cost to go bigger is a waste if you don’t plan on using the features.

Is you goal automation? Monitoring? Just to have a controller? Outline your use case first.
 

JeffB418

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 3, 2016
Messages
922
Reaction score
832
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hydros Start is IP-65 rated, Launch is only IP-30 (dust) rated
start and launch are both IP-30. They use basically the same enclosure minus a few ports.


1775160361319.png
 

black dragon designs

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 27, 2025
Messages
31
Reaction score
53
Location
cleveland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm in the same boat, I am going with the Start because of the drive ports and a/c outlets built into it. Will use it to add heater protection and add the ATO to it also. I am not so much interested in the salinity and PH monitoring
This was the same logic I used to buy the start vs the launch
I am able to use the temp probe and outlet for the heater
I use the drive ports w the small pumps they make to do auto water changes
I also wanted the ph probe and drive ports to run my ca reactor
I also use a power outlet and the skimmer sensor as a safety for my skimmer
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.0%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 35.7%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.4%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.7%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 9 7.1%
Back
Top