ICP - MS Test Results Recomendations

Reginald Reefer III

Coral Connoisseur
View Badges
Joined
Dec 15, 2020
Messages
2,353
Reaction score
4,149
Location
Boise, ID
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Reef Crystals and IO Purple are both some of the highest lithium salts I tested and I’ve seen that repeated over many tests now.

However, they are not nearly that high. Usually in the 300s.

That’s either a typo by ATI, testing error, or something is adding it routinely
I'm at a loss if it's truly that high. Maybe batteries of some kind or electronics? No clue tbh and electronics are the only thing I could think of to get it that high. I also know that some plasticizers in storage bins contain lithium but no idea where else it could come from.
 

rtparty

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
8,666
Reaction score
14,871
Location
Utah
Rating - 100%
4   0   0
I'm at a loss if it's truly that high. Maybe batteries of some kind or electronics? No clue tbh and electronics are the only thing I could think of to get it that high. I also know that some plasticizers in storage bins contain lithium but no idea where else it could come from.

If it were my test, I would reach out to ATI and confirm the reading. 199.7 seems much more likely and I had multiple typos from ATI during my salt test that they confirmed were entered incorrectly
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,230
Reaction score
92,239
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes. I am dosing both (2 part DIY) Arm & Hammer / Earthborn Calcium Chloride) and also Kalk (Mrs. Wages) via Doser.

I heard the Earthborn is a big lithium source.
 
OP
OP
W

wcharon

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
423
Reaction score
169
Location
PR
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If it were my test, I would reach out to ATI and confirm the reading. 199.7 seems much more likely and I had multiple typos from ATI during my salt test that they confirmed were entered incorrectly
That's a good point. Will do and report back what they say.

Thanks...
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,230
Reaction score
92,239
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Earthborn:

 
OP
OP
W

wcharon

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
423
Reaction score
169
Location
PR
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Well, i decided to test my water yesterday and this is the result for the mayor 3 as i changed water before the ICP came in. Seems that the WC made an improvement.

Update 03/24:

ICP: Red Sea Pro:
Salinity - 37 1.027 (36) Refractometer
KH - 9.02 8.5
Mg - 1162 1100

Plan: will lower another little today the Salinity and dose Mg (2 Part) in order to continue pushing it up to target 1350.

Also will monitor to see if my 2 Part dosing Alk (Soda Ash) is pushing my Salinity up from time to time.
 
OP
OP
W

wcharon

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
423
Reaction score
169
Location
PR
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
That's a good point. Will do and report back what they say.

Thanks...
@Randy Holmes-Farley / @rtparty / @Reginald Reefer III ...

I have just received response from ATI regarding the Lithium test. Seems fair to me. What you guys think?

""The lithium level we measured in your tank is outside the calibrated range and is therefore not very accurate. However, it is likely well over 1000 µg/l.

This is not an uncommon finding. In most cases, the cause is the use of reef mortar or cement. Fortunately, lithium is not particularly toxic.

However, we cannot estimate the long-term effects of chronically high elevated lithium levels. For this reason, we are issuing a warning and recommend water changes to lower the level. If fresh mortar/cement frag stones are added regularly, it also makes sense to switch to a different supplier of rocks or mortar."
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,230
Reaction score
92,239
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I agree that it seems reasonable, though that does not proveit isn't a mistake somehow. Most likely, though, I think it is elevated. Too much? Hard to know since lithium is not very toxic in seawater.

I would switch away from the earthborn calcium chloride.
 
OP
OP
W

wcharon

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
423
Reaction score
169
Location
PR
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I agree that it seems reasonable, though that does not proveit isn't a mistake somehow. Most likely, though, I think it is elevated. Too much? Hard to know since lithium is not very toxic in seawater.

I would switch away from the earthborn calcium chloride.
Thanks... will go that route. Let me check some of your recommendations here from Amzon.

Thanks once again.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,230
Reaction score
92,239
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 33.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.3%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top