Ideal Settings for ViparSpectra 165w?

Lightspeed

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
225
Reaction score
324
Location
Western Australia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Changed out diodes on both 165W Vipars on channel 2, added, 4 x Violet 415nm, 5 x Cyan ice blue 480nm, 4 x UV 400nm, 3 x Bright Blue 460nm and swapped the 2 Greens 520nm for 2 x Turquoise 510nm. Replaced all Warm whites for Cool whites 15000k.

Lifted Channel 1 to 50% from 45% and Channel 2 to 10% from 1%.

Its a pretty big shift in spectrum from all the White light on Channel 2 and concentrates pretty heavily on now on the 400nm to 500nm across both channels.
Timer on Channel 1 runs from 0600hrs to 1800hrs.
Timer on Channel 2 runs from 1000hrs to 1400hrs.

Still waiting on extra Royal Blue 450nm and extra Violet 415nm, i guess will let the tank adjust and watch LPS carefully for reaction after these changes.

Be nice to be able to monitor the spectrum balance now to see exactly where the changes have affected the range, probably best i can do without having top tier fittings with multiple channel adjustment.
No adjustment to mounting height, Vipars are mounted at 15" above water level, all lenses are fitted and stock issue.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
JIsBusyReefing

JIsBusyReefing

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 4, 2020
Messages
215
Reaction score
168
Location
Harrisburg
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes. It changes the spread from 90 degrees with the lenses to 120 degrees without them. With 3 fixture mounted like you have them, no lenses is the way to go IMHO.

Ron, what do you think would be a good setting for the units with lenses on? I added them back in.
 

AbjectMaelstroM

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 21, 2019
Messages
1,527
Reaction score
1,811
Location
RVA
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I know it's not the cheapest thing to do, but I would seriously recommend renting a par meter or see if you can get one locally (check FB). BRS rents them for like $50 or something? As far as reefing goes, money well spent.

Looking at your setup, with 3 of these 8" above water, you can EASILY blast your tank...with 90 degree lenses , at that height these lights are par cannons.
 
OP
OP
JIsBusyReefing

JIsBusyReefing

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 4, 2020
Messages
215
Reaction score
168
Location
Harrisburg
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I know it's not the cheapest thing to do, but I would seriously recommend renting a par meter or see if you can get one locally (check FB). BRS rents them for like $50 or something? As far as reefing goes, money well spent.

Looking at your setup, with 3 of these 8" above water, you can EASILY blast your tank...with 90 degree lenses , at that height these lights are par cannons.

I know. Just don't have the money with the holidays coming up. They require something like a $500 deposit, and that ain't happening. Lol
 

LeftyReefer

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 17, 2020
Messages
2,535
Reaction score
2,823
Location
Saginaw
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm sticking close to the BRS recommended mounting height of 14" and keeping the lenses on. At 13"-14" above the waterline, i get very little to no disco ball effect, so I see no reason to remove the lenses and lose par while doing so.

I've turned my lights up slightly, I'm now at 70% blue 7% White, and added an additional hour to the white channel.
Now 12 hours of blues and 5 hours of whites. I'll keep turning them up slowly and increasing the time the whites are on.

I added my first couple SPS frags a few weeks ago and I'm already seeing some tiny new growth on them, so I guess my settings can't be too far off.
 

Ron Reefman

Lets Go Snorkeling!
View Badges
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
9,286
Reaction score
20,888
Location
SW Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ron, what do you think would be a good setting for the units with lenses on? I added them back in.

Joe, I think you could lower the setting by 20% and run the lenses. You are probably even low enough to ru at your current setting with the lenses in place. The bare leds are typically a 120 degree spread and with the lenses it's a 90 degree spread. That would bump up the PAR by about 10% to 20%. If you don't mind the look, run the the lenses still off on the red, green and violet leds. There aren't very many and without lenses their light will spread more and cause less 'spotlighting'.
 
OP
OP
JIsBusyReefing

JIsBusyReefing

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 4, 2020
Messages
215
Reaction score
168
Location
Harrisburg
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joe, I think you could lower the setting by 20% and run the lenses. You are probably even low enough to ru at your current setting with the lenses in place. The bare leds are typically a 120 degree spread and with the lenses it's a 90 degree spread. That would bump up the PAR by about 10% to 20%. If you don't mind the look, run the the lenses still off on the red, green and violet leds. There aren't very many and without lenses their light will spread more and cause less 'spotlighting'.

Thanks! What about UV? There are 4 of these diodes in the middle column. I've got a Fluval Marine LED 3.0 48" strip in there as well to add more color. I'm not sure which channels need to be set to what. I have blues and whites turned off, since I already get those from the Vipars, and pinks, purples, and cyans on, since I don't get these from the Vipars.

8E9095BD-015D-43D5-A699-9F24BEE81167.png
 

Ron Reefman

Lets Go Snorkeling!
View Badges
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
9,286
Reaction score
20,888
Location
SW Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'd run the UV (if they are really true UV i.e. below 400nm spectrum) lower as they are higher energy spectrum. As for the cyan and pink... I wouldn't waste my time with them. Your corals really don't need them giver they are getting white light already, and white light is a mix of all spectrum.
 
OP
OP
JIsBusyReefing

JIsBusyReefing

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 4, 2020
Messages
215
Reaction score
168
Location
Harrisburg
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'd run the UV (if they are really true UV i.e. below 400nm spectrum) lower as they are higher energy spectrum. As for the cyan and pink... I wouldn't waste my time with them. Your corals really don't need them giver they are getting white light already, and white light is a mix of all spectrum.

It does indeed have some UV. BRS tested it in the link below. At 30:25, they tested with both channels at 100%. At 33:40, they tested it with blues at 100% and whites at 30%.

Also, gotcha. Should I just take out the Fluval strip then? It's blocking some of the vipar's cones.

 

Semisonyx

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
288
Reaction score
193
Location
Birmingham, AL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I use the Vipars on my 180. Buy a lux meter for $15-$20 off of Amazon. Dividing the reading by 50 is pretty accurate; 20,000Lux = about 400 PAR. I did this and then later happened upon an opportunity to borrow a PAR meter. The Lux meter was within about 5%. Only downside is that with a lux meter you can only read at the surface, but if you have sufficient par on the surface, the rest isn’t a big deal. With a big tank though, I’d put the lenses back on and hang them 14” from the water. That’s where I have mine, and I have no disco and am also growing sps on the bottom of the tank.
 
OP
OP
JIsBusyReefing

JIsBusyReefing

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 4, 2020
Messages
215
Reaction score
168
Location
Harrisburg
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I use the Vipars on my 180. Buy a lux meter for $15-$20 off of Amazon. Dividing the reading by 50 is pretty accurate; 20,000Lux = about 400 PAR. I did this and then later happened upon an opportunity to borrow a PAR meter. The Lux meter was within about 5%. Only downside is that with a lux meter you can only read at the surface, but if you have sufficient par on the surface, the rest isn’t a big deal. With a big tank though, I’d put the lenses back on and hang them 14” from the water. That’s where I have mine, and I have no disco and am also growing sps on the bottom of the tank.

Thanks for the tip! I'll definitely do that soon. Unfortunately, I can't mount them any higher than where I have them. The tank has a canopy and the lighting is already mounted as high as it goes in there.
 

Semisonyx

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
288
Reaction score
193
Location
Birmingham, AL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks for the tip! I'll definitely do that soon. Unfortunately, I can't mount them any higher than where I have them. The tank has a canopy and the lighting is already mounted as high as it goes in there.

I had a fourth unit that for fun I took the lenses off of and hung above my tank. At 14” above the water with no lenses and both channels running 100%, I was getting something like 350-400 par just below the surface. Due to the way it was hanging, I couldn’t lower it to test it at 8” above the water.
 

El_Negrito

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 27, 2018
Messages
25
Reaction score
43
Location
Aguadilla, Puerto Rico
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

Lightspeed

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
225
Reaction score
324
Location
Western Australia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

AbjectMaelstroM

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 21, 2019
Messages
1,527
Reaction score
1,811
Location
RVA
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
It does indeed have some UV. BRS tested it in the link below. At 30:25, they tested with both channels at 100%. At 33:40, they tested it with blues at 100% and whites at 30%.

Also, gotcha. Should I just take out the Fluval strip then? It's blocking some of the vipar's cones.



There are no UV (peak sub 400nm) LEDs on any of the black boxes, including viparspectra.
 

AbjectMaelstroM

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 21, 2019
Messages
1,527
Reaction score
1,811
Location
RVA
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Omg, it seriously hurts my brain watching that guy, he needs to get off the weed baaadly.

Yeah he's a little...um yeah. I slugged through his video on the viparspectra's, while informative, his style just doesn't work for me so I won't be watching any more.
 

El_Negrito

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 27, 2018
Messages
25
Reaction score
43
Location
Aguadilla, Puerto Rico
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Omg, it seriously hurts my brain watching that guy, he needs to get off the weed baaadly
Yea he's "special", for lack of a better word. Still the mod he suggested, changing the lenses, seems better than removing them all together. Or just removing the iner lenses and leaving the outer ones. This way you can lower the light and minimize hot spots in the middle.
 

Keeping it clean: Have you used a filter roller?

  • I currently use a filter roller.

    Votes: 16 32.7%
  • I don’t currently use a filter roller, but I have in the past.

    Votes: 2 4.1%
  • I have never used a filter roller, but I plan to in the future.

    Votes: 11 22.4%
  • I have never used a filter roller and have no plans to in the future.

    Votes: 17 34.7%
  • Other.

    Votes: 3 6.1%
Back
Top