If you were a fish...
- Thread starter Anna K
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Slocke
I’m pedantic, ignore me
Excellence Award
Reef Tank 365
Photo of the Month
R2R App User
Pumpkin
Article Contributor
My Tank Thread
My Aquarium Showcase
Dragon wrasse, boring on the outside. Evil on the inside. Definitely not reef safe 
StartingATank
Self-Diagnosed Coral Addict
Flounder, because I would be a master of disguise. If we did any marine animal, I would probably say Jelly, because I would be immortal.
luis angel
Tailspots and Tacos
Partner Member 2026
Photo of the Month
R2R App User
Hospitality Award
305 Reef Club
My Tank Thread
My Aquarium Showcase
A tailspot blenny, so much personality in a small individual ;)
Uhm... NO...But mammals are fish
Just as orcas are dolphins, and dolphins are whales, and whales are mammals. Mammals are fish
All mammals are animals, but not all animals are mammals.
Mammals can regulate their body temp. fish can not.
Slocke
I’m pedantic, ignore me
Excellence Award
Reef Tank 365
Photo of the Month
R2R App User
Pumpkin
Article Contributor
My Tank Thread
My Aquarium Showcase
Mammals are a subset of fish just as whales are a subset of mammals. It's simple evolutionary biology.
inference-review.com
On Being a Fish | Bret Weinstein | Inference
Humans are fish according to a cladistic understanding. In the first of a series on technical nomenclature, evolutionary theorist Bret Weinstein distinguishes clade, taxon, and monophyletic group from functional groupings, arguing that taxonomic labels should fully track cladistic relationships.
inference-review.com
I want to be a Merman...
Red_Beard
I already did
Whatever you say, dorthy-annMammals are a subset of fish just as whales are a subset of mammals. It's simple evolutionary biology.
On Being a Fish | Bret Weinstein | Inference
Humans are fish according to a cladistic understanding. In the first of a series on technical nomenclature, evolutionary theorist Bret Weinstein distinguishes clade, taxon, and monophyletic group from functional groupings, arguing that taxonomic labels should fully track cladistic relationships.
MikeReefs
Well-Known Member
Personatus Angelfish if I was owned by a reefer. They’re owned by millionaires with the best care money can buy. In huge tanks with no predators. If we’re talking about the wild I’d prob go Greenland shark living 500 years
Last edited:
Slocke
I’m pedantic, ignore me
Excellence Award
Reef Tank 365
Photo of the Month
R2R App User
Pumpkin
Article Contributor
My Tank Thread
My Aquarium Showcase
It’s a simple fact. Another thing they kind of start to teach you in school but then decide, meh, it’s too complicated. Even though it isn’t.Whatever you say, dorthy-ann
OMG... this guy is at every house party... Spouting out seemingly wisdom rhetoric. Standing in the corner talking anybody's ear off who will fall into his clutches... With enough reasonably sounding diatribe to hold your attention. But in the end it is BS.Mammals are a subset of fish just as whales are a subset of mammals. It's simple evolutionary biology.
On Being a Fish | Bret Weinstein | Inference
Humans are fish according to a cladistic understanding. In the first of a series on technical nomenclature, evolutionary theorist Bret Weinstein distinguishes clade, taxon, and monophyletic group from functional groupings, arguing that taxonomic labels should fully track cladistic relationships.
Also tends to take home the hottest female...
Red_Beard
I already did
Straight up I'm a blob fish. Totally fine in my element deep in the depths. Anywhere else though i turn into a dork.
Red_Beard
I already did
Sounds like the plot to inception. Complicated for complications sake, but in the end could have been written by a 3 year old. In crayon.
I want to be carbon... because fish are made out of carbon... :thinking-face: :rolling-on-the-floor-laughing:
Reef_Aquatics
Community Member
Whale shark so that I don't get bullied or eaten
Similar threads
