Microscopes

  • Thread starter Thread starter cba191
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

cba191

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
1,127
Reaction score
954
Location
salt lake city
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
4bcd921a-a7df-45a8-885c-bf3835623b31.jpg

Is something like this even worth looking at getting?
 
4bcd921a-a7df-45a8-885c-bf3835623b31.jpg

Is something like this even worth looking at getting?
It is unlikely to have the magnification needed to identify dinoflagellates. Also the top lighting or lighting from above is not really the best lighting source for the job either.
 
Ok - that particular "coin" microscope you showed is pretty much useless for reefing...

You need to get to a real actual 100 times magnification to 400 times magnification for identification of phytoplankton and such. That means you need a microscope that can actually show you true magnification and not just garbage digital zoom from an image projected on a digital sensor and then rendered on a small screen.

For a cheap, well under 200.00 usd pricetag, solution you can try finding an actual monocular compound microscope like the AmScope 150 series where your looking at 40x-1000x through the use of a 10 times eyepiece using the objective lens settings of 4x, 10x, 40x - letting you see 40x, 100x, and 400x / with the 25 times eyepiece, you get 100x, 250x, 1000x - however you loose the compounded viewing when you use a usb camera like the amscope wd200 series because it replaces the initial eyepiece and that removes the compounding view so you end up with a camera view 4x, 10x, and 40x and then need to rely on digital zooming in where your image ends up being only as good as the sensor is that the objective lens is focusing on. Do your research before you buy and understand what your actually buying :)
 
Last edited:

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT’S YOUR MOST MEMORABLE EXPERIENCE WITH A CORAL THAT LOOKED LIKE IT MIGHT NOT MAKE IT?

  • I’ve seen a dramatic comeback. I would have sworn it was a goner

    Votes: 13 44.8%
  • A slow recovery, and it got back to looking healthy

    Votes: 5 17.2%
  • It came back some, but never looked as good as it used to

    Votes: 3 10.3%
  • I tried to save one, but it didn’t make it

    Votes: 2 6.9%
  • Mine is still struggling...no comeback yet

    Votes: 3 10.3%
  • I’ve never had a coral in serious trouble

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • See, this is why I don’t keep corals

    Votes: 1 3.4%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 2 6.9%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new