Microscopy Thread

Random photo of a little smudge of brown algae I wiped off the glass at 400X. Mostly diatoms and dinos unfortunately (I think) but it is a pretty picture!

IMG_7566 copy.jpg
Diatoms, Ostreopsis, Amphidinium, and some Foraminifera in the center I would say if I had to guess. Actually something you will see quite often. Diatoms and dinos can live side by side quite well in many cases which is why I assume silicate dosing is only effective if the diatoms actually manage to absolutely smother the dinos.

Thanks for sharing!
 
Playing with the scope some more. This is fun! (would be more fun if it was not a dino outbreak that made me pull the old scope out!)

Found some of these little guys swimming in the sand sample, what is it? These were taken at 400X.

IMG_7578 copy.jpg




BTW I think you were right, I appear to have both amphidinium (large and small cell?) and ostreopsis. Working on a plan of attack!

IMG_7571.JPG
 
Found some of these little guys swimming in the sand sample, what is it? These were taken at 400X.
I would say you have found a ciliate (Ciliophora). They are extremely abundant and I'm very bad at telling them apart. I assume it's some Spirotrich (Class Spirotrichea), but don't know the family, or genus.

Identifying them takes quite a while as you can see here, and you need to be familiar with their anatomy (which I'm not 😅). Bright-field microscopy alone is often not sufficient and you need access to phase contrast or better differential interference contrast (DIC).

As you have found it in the substrate and I can't see any zooxanthellae in its body, I would say it's a good guy as most ciliates you will see are. I have recorded a few bad guys today and if I'm happy with the recording I might post them in a few minutes.

Edit: The big worm is a nematode btw. see post #92, page 5.
 
Pathogens & Opportunists

Note: If you are using the app you might need to switch to a web browser to be able to see the video(s).

While I certainly don't enjoy seeing bad things happen in my tank, I hope to be able to show different parasites and pathogens sooner or later (hopefully sampled from another tank and not my own 🤣).

A hard truth of this hobby is that we don't always know what happened to a polyp, or whole coral, that caused it to suffer tissue loss or death. All we get to observe is what is left after the fact. This distinction matters, because opportunistic organisms move fast and are often already present by the time we manage to take a sample. In other words: whatever you see on a dying fish or coral, you can't be sure it's the primary cause. It's entirely possible it's simply helping break down tissue, or feeding on other organisms that are doing so.

Below are some ciliates that I find on dying tissue whenever two corals start stinging each other. In this case, I found them on a zoa polyp:


(Ciliates with previously consumed zooxanthellae of a zoanthid in their body)​

Some ciliates are known to be associated with coral diseases, such as Philaster lucinda and Helicostoma notatum, both found in brown band disease samples from the Great Barrier Reef. The ciliates pictured above share a similar shape to P. lucinda, though shape alone isn't enough to identify them.

There were, of course, other ciliates present as well. They resemble Cohnilembus sp. but I'm not sure either. Interestingly, both Philaster and Cohnilembus belong to the same subclass, Scuticociliata. I've never seen these ciliates carry any Symbiodinium sp. zooxanthellae in their bodies, so I can only assume they have another reason for being there.


(Ciliates near the decaying tissue)​

Bacteria are present in abundance too, but they are too small for light microscopy to identify them with any confidence. Even 1000x magnification wouldn't change this as we are hitting the physical limit of what visual light can resolve.


(Bacteria around zooxanthellae)
None of this tells us what started the problem, and that's kind of the point I'm trying to make. Finding ciliates or bacteria on damaged tissue is normal and doesn't automatically mean you've found the primary pathogen.
 
Last edited:
Rotifer
(Brachionus plicatilis)


Note: If you are using the app you might need to switch to a web browser to be able to see the video(s).

I rarely see rotifers in my tank and especially Brachionus rotifers don't seem to survive long-term. They are frequently sold as zooplankton but in contrast to copepods don't seem to keep a stable population or are hiding too well for me to find them.


(Brachionus plicatilis)​

Common NameRotifer
ClassificationBrachionus plicatilis
VerdictBeneficial
Size 100μm - 340μm
Found?
RaritySold as fish larvae food / zooplankton, seemingly disappears over time in a tank
 
Awesome! And who is this little guy who snuck into that video?
A well fed ciliate. I assume it's an Euplotida ciliate due to the "shield" on its back, but don't quote me on that 😅

You can see similar ones (but from another angle) in post #100 (page 5) and post #123 (page 7). I hopefully can make a better video for Post #100 soon now that I have better objectives and another camera that works better with the microscope.
 
Filter Sock Findings
Filter socks can be pretty annoying since they clog up every few days. That got me wondering what's actually in them. For the most part, it was just detritus: dead diatoms (or rather their frustules), bits of nori that my tang tore off the clip but didn't catch before it drifted into the overflow, sand, small insects that had fallen into the tank, various bacteria, molts from small crustaceans like copepods, and a lot of stuff that was no longer recognizable.


(Ciliate with a small "tail")


(Similar to the first ciliate, but without the tail)


(Round ciliate)


(An egg or cyst, maybe?)


(Filaments)
I find these filaments quite often, and I'm wondering if they're really just dead algae or something else. The strange part is that they're always fully bleached, even when I find them stuck to the glass in my display tank or somewhere else with plenty of light.
 
Oh yeah, I didn't mean I was looking to buy your kind of microscope for $2000. I was just curious if you had any recommendations within that price range 😅

I've got another ID request in the meantime. AI says it's Trichodina and that it can apparently parasitize on fish (mine aren't showing any symptoms). It's the first time I've heard of it. I scraped it off my skimmer cup.

[Images]

I might have gotten another step closer to solving the riddle. I have found one of your fake-Trichodina specimen myself 😁 I knew I saw it somewhere before. Interestingly the two gaps in the shell were present as well and I'm reasonably sure that I didn't squish the specimen. That means this might be part of its shell.

Export1.jpg

(Brightfield 400x)

Export2.jpg

(400x DIC causing strong Birefringence effect)

Export3.jpg

(Brightfield 200x - Side view, broken specimen stuck in detritus)​

This confirms my previous suggestion that it might be a Foraminifera, and Patellina corrugata is still the best match. The funny thing is: I kept searching for limpets after seeing the side-view of it. But "Patellina" literally means "little limpet" 😁 It's still a Foraminifera though. The one I found was quite large, so you should be able to find more of them sooner or later as well. I found mine in some detritus in the filter sump.
 
This is an awesome post to look at. I found a sale on amazon for a digital microscope and am trying it out. I'm sure it will take a bit of practice and patience to get really good pics or videos. This is day one with the lowest setting.

A four or five day old brine shrimp.

microscope_0001.jpg


microscope_0002.jpg


An unknown copepod, one of many that made their way into the brine shrimp grow out tank. This was hard to capture then seclude it to a small enough water spot to keep it from moving too fast.

microscope_0003.jpg


This is a fun start. This was with the minimum power of three glasses.
 
This is an awesome post to look at. I found a sale on amazon for a digital microscope and am trying it out. I'm sure it will take a bit of practice and patience to get really good pics or videos. This is day one with the lowest setting.

A four or five day old brine shrimp.

microscope_0001.jpg


microscope_0002.jpg


An unknown copepod, one of many that made their way into the brine shrimp grow out tank. This was hard to capture then seclude it to a small enough water spot to keep it from moving too fast.

microscope_0003.jpg


This is a fun start. This was with the minimum power of three glasses.
Brine shrimp nauplii don't like to sit still they are annoying to capture, tried it myself the other day 😁

Did an image go missing? I see three images of brine shrimp nauplii, but you mentioned some copepod.
 
Brine shrimp nauplii don't like to sit still they are annoying to capture, tried it myself the other day 😁

Did an image go missing? I see three images of brine shrimp nauplii, but you mentioned some copepod.

I could very well be mistaken. I thought the third bug was a copepod. The brine shrimp seem to move in a slow and strait forward swim. This one like a few others have a fast jerky movement that I assumed was a copepod.

By your reply I am now second guessing and maybe newer hatchlings can move around in that jerky motion. That would make more sense in how they got there.

I have no expertise at this at all. This was just my guess with limited knowledge.
 
Brine shrimp nauplii don't like to sit still they are annoying to capture, tried it myself the other day 😁

Did an image go missing? I see three images of brine shrimp nauplii, but you mentioned some copepod.

I could very well be mistaken. I thought the third bug was a copepod. The brine shrimp seem to move in a slow and strait forward swim. This one like a few others have a fast jerky movement that I assumed was a copepod.

By your reply I am now second guessing and maybe newer hatchlings can move around in that jerky motion. That would make more sense in how they got there.

I have no expertise at this at all. This was just my guess with limited knowledge.
All good. Artemia nauplii move by flapping their arms which creates this jerky motion. The adults move much more elegant.

Here you can see some nauplii which matches your third image:
https://www.researchgate.net/figure...hown-next-to-Artemia-that-were_fig3_351844315
 
What an amazing thread! I thought I'd share a video of a bristle worm I took with my dissecting scope + phone mount. I should have recorded the magnification I had, but it was probably somewhere between 15-30x. I managed to capture some feeding behavior which was pretty awesome!

 
What an amazing thread! I thought I'd share a video of a bristle worm I took with my dissecting scope + phone mount. I should have recorded the magnification I had, but it was probably somewhere between 15-30x. I managed to capture some feeding behavior which was pretty awesome!

Thank you for sharing this and the kind words! This thing has very long bristles and looks creepy, I like it 😂
I might try to find out more about it later.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new