This is going to be long and gets in the middle of the whole stem of issues that are being brought up in this melting pot of a thread now. I've debated and so far haven't posted this, but through PM's here and on other platforms I do get asked why I left the ecosystem / brand, so might as well fully put pen to paper.
I remember filling out the customer experience surveys last year and my answer must have ticked a box because a NS employee decided to follow up this past January, then crickets. I'll paste what I sent to them, and interject with some further events that made me decide to stop supporting Neptune Systems with my dollars.
What happened since sending that reply in was crickets in return, the entire Trident release fiasco, how they treated another local owner with his leaky $160 CAD reagent order, the classic at my parents house going into a panic'd reboot loop for hours because of AWS reliance, one of my newest by production date DOS's failing with the alkalinty head reporting it was working but wasn't, being laughed at by another industry partner on a company stream for a question regarding equipment and IoTA, and the general snide, condescending tone that's crept into their public facing persona and discourse.
My feeling is that the current incarnation of the company seems to be taking for granted the users that have gotten them to this point, instead hyper focused on marketing to move products that in many cases don't live up to performance or longevity expectations. I never really had much in the way of issues until the PMUP / 2016 "era", and still think overall it's a good platform for most. If it's working for others, I hope it all continues to work without issue. They're just no longer a company I want to support, or suggest supporting to others, for whatever my opinion is worth.
I remember filling out the customer experience surveys last year and my answer must have ticked a box because a NS employee decided to follow up this past January, then crickets. I'll paste what I sent to them, and interject with some further events that made me decide to stop supporting Neptune Systems with my dollars.
In hindsight the only thing I really regret with the summary explanation of my product ecosystem ownership above was not pushing for them to cover the PMUP failures without any cost to myself. At the time I just didn't want the hassle of the back and forth for a number of reasons, I've since stopped accepting excuses with things in general.Honestly it's been a cumulative experience for my going on four years in the hobby. I have quite a few Neptune products in the ecosystem including an old and 2016 head unit, which is thousands of dollars in invested equipment. Most of that has been good, but there have been let-downs that make me wary of jumping in on anything new again before the community at large has their turn with retail use:
PMUP, bought one near when they first released so I could replace a MJ1200 on my carbon reactor input to free an EB832 outlet up. It failed within about 4 months with the swollen body, this was always 100% under salt water and made sure there was no air gap or air pocket in the pump. I've used FW aquaclears for years and am well versed in getting any of that air out of the impeller housing before using them. I realize that's an inverted AC vs dc situation, but still, not a newbie at pump use overall. I also inquired, not via support but FB about the noise from when it was brand new and was told it would 'break in' or I could RMA it back to California and get a new one. I wasn't about to pay $25 CAD shipping to CA, so just lived with the noise till it did die.
ATK: Same issue with the PMUP, but it died after a few months in fresh water ATO use. The reservoir is a 25g Norwesco tank, that's never been allowed to run dry, but same result. I did not contact support about this one as given my impression from the first pump, that I'd probably have to RMA and ship it back, it wasn't worth it. The module has been sitting quasi offline since and I've gone back to the Tunze 3155 that never gave me an issue.
COR-20: The pump itself is great, but I was let down with the minimum GPH flow rate it has, which even at 1% is too much to allow for the much marketed "feed mode" to hold the water line just below the overflow on my ~ 80 gallon system. I didn't buy the COR-15 as I wanted the ability to operate without relying on the EB832 in case that ever died I'd be SOL like some of the 1link users have come across with failing WAV's. As well, it came with no guard for the intake, which in a tank with breeding snails, is kind of important and seemed like a very cheap way to save a few bucks in terms of manufacturing cost. The Jebao DCP8500 the COR replaced did come with a guard, which I put on the COR. So I basically paid 3x what my Jebao cost, for a pump that doesn't function any differently and came with less "valuable" accessories. Yes I understand the QC standpoint the COR is superior, but unless I'm mistaken the COR20 has a 1 year warranty as well. That doesn't impart an impression of much faith in your equipment not to prematurely fail after a year, but that's something the entire industry, and other industries have coalesced around and for some reason consumers have accepted it.
DOS: No matter what is done, air gets in the lines. I've tried re-heating, re-seating, everything and it eventually just happens. Having come across a mod to the DOS using John Guest push connect fittings, the same as the DDR uses, the issues have been fixed. I shouldn't have to mod a $400 two-unit doser to get zero air, those plastic compression fittings just don't seem to work long term. The other nit-pick is why no three head option, as when I had gone down the road of 3 part additive it required another dos to be purchased, then a spare head sitting un-used, or dosing Mg manually with the single DOS, etc. Or even offer a single head DOS that you can just link into the DOS body itself via that powered 4pin connection, etc. Price is the largest factor in my not so great view of the DOS, and if I had originally went with something along the lines of the BRS individual dosers I probably wouldn't have bought dos #2. As well, dos #2 out of the box wouldn't hold prime on one of the heads, though support did come through and ship me a new one which I was thankful for. Dos #3 is recent and I am going to experiment with automatic water changes, that brings another minor gripe. The heads only prime in the add direction, yet the AWC task sets the waste water into a remove direction, so I will have to swap / run the outputs to prime the line, then return it to 'remove' configuration physically. If the manual buttons could be set to advanced in the remove direction that would be a big help.
Lastly there's the Trident. I know, you guys probably get the question dozens of times a day, when is the Trident coming out, what's going on with it etc. At first note of Jim's DIY alk monitor at MACNA 2016 I was excited as I was starting to dabble in acropora and while expensive, I take a look at this hobby as one that imparts a huge de-stress factor in my life and to make things go as smoothly as possible, the upfront and ongoing cost would be worth it. Fast forward today and we're still somewhat scant on info, though I gather there is some new news today being released about what the status is. I do though feel and have expressed this in posts on the official Neptune group, and R2R that perhaps shooting for the moon has caused more problems than it would solve. I have almost come to the point of purchasing an Alkatronic, as feedback from everyone I have asked which is over 20 people at this point has been very good overall. The testing methodology is different, but the result is the same, and the more I progress in the hobby the less I am worried about minor variations in Ca and Mg, versus those that predict and dictate issues arising immediately which is Alkalinity levels in my experience. So if I do go Trident, and testing dKH much more frequently than Ca or Mg, do I get stuck buying reagent 3 packs and not using half of them, or increase Ca / Mg testing for the sake of not wasting reagent, etc. Then there's the monthly cost, what's that going to look like with specific Neptune reagents vs a base acid that can be sourced via a local scientific supply company and DIY. Finally, form factor. I want to wall mount things, not build shelves for equipment to sit on, so while a personal and minor preference, form factor is another minus to me. Something like this I would most definitely let others be the guinea pig for me come retail.
So in summary I had been mostly happy with my purchases up until the PMUP era of releases. I feel that perhaps Neptune has been worrying too much about name presence and product style than providing bulletproof products that justify the price tag in the last while. There is zero reason a utility pump should be failing prematurely in RODI water, and frankly even salt water use unless abused, and my faults with that are not unique as it seems at least a couple times a week on R2R or now your own FB group people are bringing up the PUMP commonly failing in different ways. I guess you could also present that in another light; over-promising and under-delivering. Marketing is great, but don't let it get ahead of your product in real world use, like in my COR example. Bad on me for not realizing there was a rather high minimum GPH / RPM of the pump, but also bad on Neptune for making it sound like the pump would operate "feed' mode perfectly, at least from the impression I got from all the pitches online.
What happened since sending that reply in was crickets in return, the entire Trident release fiasco, how they treated another local owner with his leaky $160 CAD reagent order, the classic at my parents house going into a panic'd reboot loop for hours because of AWS reliance, one of my newest by production date DOS's failing with the alkalinty head reporting it was working but wasn't, being laughed at by another industry partner on a company stream for a question regarding equipment and IoTA, and the general snide, condescending tone that's crept into their public facing persona and discourse.
My feeling is that the current incarnation of the company seems to be taking for granted the users that have gotten them to this point, instead hyper focused on marketing to move products that in many cases don't live up to performance or longevity expectations. I never really had much in the way of issues until the PMUP / 2016 "era", and still think overall it's a good platform for most. If it's working for others, I hope it all continues to work without issue. They're just no longer a company I want to support, or suggest supporting to others, for whatever my opinion is worth.