recent ICP - lacking tons of elements

IPT

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 30, 2023
Messages
471
Reaction score
320
Location
Alaska
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Here is my recent ICP test. I seem to be lacking a host of minor and some major elements. Mixed reef that I feed Pellets 2x a day (every day) and mysis and brine (5x per week). I do 10% WC's weekly with instant ocean and have been adding 5-10Ml's of Tropic Marin A and K for about 4 months.

Should I dose these products independently ala Moosnshiners or will increasing A and K dosing suffice?

Also, whats the difference between Phosphates and Phosphorus (are they intimately linked where I address one the other will correct)? I'm not sure why mine is so high as my test kits didn't reflect this (though I have been having some algae issues and this probably explains why.

ICP.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Analysis result 12-3-25.pdf
    339.7 KB · Views: 71
Last edited:

JonoH

ɹǝpunʍoᗡ ƃuıɟǝǝᴚ
View Badges
Joined
May 16, 2023
Messages
2,273
Reaction score
4,459
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Phosphate and Phosphorus is the same, just a different unit of measurement - those with ULN systems tend to use Phosphorus - personally i dont think its that high, but ICP's tend to have their baseline measurements off an ULN system (ultra low nutrient).

Apart from your calcium, the rest seem to be fairly standard elements that are low - may just need to increase the amount of trace you are dosing - depends on the coral uptake of these.
Generally you dose to correct the low, then increase the overall trace to compensate for it moving forward.
 

EnterName

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2025
Messages
808
Reaction score
1,931
Location
Germany
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Phosphorus is the element P and phosphate is the molecule of one P and four oxygen written as PO4.

You can approximate phosphate levels from phosphorus by multiplying the measurement of P by 3.066, as phosphate is approx. 3.066 times heavier than phosphorus. (This assumes all phosphorus in the sample is bound to phosphate).

ICP-OES isn't as precise as ICP-MS so many elements can't be measured down to their natural seawater levels and are simply noted as "Not detectable" but still "Normal" without recommendations about adding them. You need an ICP-MS analysis to actually know if you have a deficiency of these elements, but at least you can be sure you don't have too high levels.
 
Last edited:

rtparty

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
8,666
Reaction score
14,877
Location
Utah
Rating - 100%
4   0   0
How are you supplementing alk, calcium, and magnesium? The only trace value that is low seems to be molybdenum which seems to be common with IO these days
 
OP
OP
IPT

IPT

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 30, 2023
Messages
471
Reaction score
320
Location
Alaska
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Phosphate and Phosphorus is the same, just a different unit of measurement - those with ULN systems tend to use Phosphorus - personally i dont think its that high, but ICP's tend to have their baseline measurements off an ULN system (ultra low nutrient).

Apart from your calcium, the rest seem to be fairly standard elements that are low - may just need to increase the amount of trace you are dosing - depends on the coral uptake of these.
Generally you dose to correct the low, then increase the overall trace to compensate for it moving forward.
The only direct trace I dose is the Tropic Marin A and K. I guess I need to increase the dose and maybe supplement something else in addition.
 
OP
OP
IPT

IPT

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 30, 2023
Messages
471
Reaction score
320
Location
Alaska
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
How are you supplementing alk, calcium, and magnesium? The only trace value that is low seems to be molybdenum which seems to be common with IO these days
Yeah, I was low on the last test 6 months ago as well. In parts it's why I started the Tropic Marin A and K, but it didn't seem to bring it up much if at all.

I dose saturated Kalk (2800ml a day) plus A and B from the BRS dry goods. I use Magnesium flake for the MG, but I need to be more regular about that. It's only good because it was WAY low (like 900) and I overdosed it (up to like 1600) and it's falling now.
 
OP
OP
IPT

IPT

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 30, 2023
Messages
471
Reaction score
320
Location
Alaska
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Phosphorus is the element P and phosphate is the molecule of one P and four oxygen written as PO4.

You can approximate phosphate levels from phosphorus by multiplying the measurement of P by 3.066, as phosphate is approx. 3.066 times heavier than phosphorus. (This assumes all phosphorus in the sample is bound to phosphate).

ICP-OES isn't as precise as ICP-MS so many elements can't be measured down to their natural seawater levels and are simply noted as "Not detectable" but still "Normal" without recommendations about adding them. You need an ICP-MS analysis to actually know if you have a deficiency of these elements, but at least you can be sure you don't have too high levels.
Yeah, I guess I should do one of the more precise ICPs. Who is the preferred lab for the MS test with good prices and quality?
 

EnterName

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2025
Messages
808
Reaction score
1,931
Location
Germany
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Phosphorus is the element P and phosphate is the molecule of one P and four oxygen written as PO4.

You can approximate phosphate levels from phosphorus by multiplying the measurement of P by 3.066, as phosphate is approx. 3.066 times heavier than phosphorus. (This assumes all phosphorus in the sample is bound to phosphate).

ICP-OES isn't as precise as ICP-MS so many elements can't be measured down to their natural seawater levels and are simply noted as "Not detectable" but still "Normal" without recommendations about adding them. You need an ICP-MS analysis to actually know if you have a deficiency of these elements, but at least you can be sure you don't have too high levels.
Yeah, I guess I should do one of the more precise ICPs. Who is the preferred lab for the MS test with good prices and quality?
I personally use ATI and Oceamo, but if you want timely results, you might want to choose a laboratory that doesn't require shipping a sample to Europe. I'm from Germany so I don't know what options are available to you over there.
 

Bruttall

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 19, 2023
Messages
1,446
Reaction score
2,413
Location
Council Bluffs
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You Know ICP has a subscription Trace Element Program, they send you a test every month and for a small fee, they send you ALL TRACE ELEMENTS NEEDED, but it is a 1 yr subscription.
For my 340 gallon system, cost is like $109 a month, the test alone is $50, so $59 for a Months worth of Trace, I spend that on All4Reef alone.

 

EnterName

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2025
Messages
808
Reaction score
1,931
Location
Germany
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You Know ICP has a subscription Trace Element Program, they send you a test every month and for a small fee, they send you ALL TRACE ELEMENTS NEEDED, but it is a 1 yr subscription.
For my 340 gallon system, cost is like $109 a month, the test alone is $50, so $59 for a Months worth of Trace, I spend that on All4Reef alone.

ICP-OES isn't precise enough to detect quite a few essential trace elements at their natural concentration in seawater. You need ICP-MS to do this, which Triton doesn't seem to offer.

Of course you can manage with ICP-OES, but to detect current deficiencies you will need ICP-MS.
 

jackson6745

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
2,353
Reaction score
3,027
Location
NJ
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Oes tests are a waste of money. Do the ATI-MS test next time and all those NA values which could potentially be toxic, will have a value.
 

Hans-Werner

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
1,994
Reaction score
3,042
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Iodine is near the ideal concentration, nickel and copper are found. I think there is no urgent need to react. The trace elements contained in the K+ and A- Elements are dosed to reasonable concentrations in reasonable ratios. The rest is more a problem of ICP-OES analysis than of corals needing more trace elements.

Ignore any recommendations for iron and manganese if they are low. Their concentrations are just too unstable and any analysis of these elements is a snapshot at best.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.0%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 35.7%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.4%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.7%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 9 7.1%
Back
Top