Reef Factory

Sisterlimonpot

Effortless Perfection
View Badges
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
4,892
Reaction score
8,625
Location
Litchfield Park
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
It seems that before Christmas they made the decision to lay off most of their staff.

They're definitely hurting, and should give pause to anyone looking to purchase their products based solely on them utilizing cloud services to communicate with their products.

This means if they go under, cloud services will default and most (if not all) reef factory devices will become expensive desk art.
 
OP
OP
R

reefedout1

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 17, 2022
Messages
7
Reaction score
3
Location
australia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It seems that before Christmas they made the decision to lay off most of their staff.

They're definitely hurting, and should give pause to anyone looking to purchase their products based solely on them utilizing cloud services to communicate with their products.

This means if they go under, cloud services will default and most (if not all) reef factory devices will become expensive desk art.
Know for sure they did this or just forum rumors?
 

Gribbles

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 10, 2022
Messages
582
Reaction score
456
Location
Cypress
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Ugh, that sucks. I've actually had great experience with their filter roller and dosing pumps.

Anyone know if their servers go down, the products would still operate but would no longer be able to be adjusted via their app (or anywhere else)?
 

shadyraro

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 21, 2022
Messages
604
Reaction score
375
Location
Sydney
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ugh, that sucks. I've actually had great experience with their filter roller and dosing pumps.

Anyone know if their servers go down, the products would still operate but would no longer be able to be adjusted via their app (or anywhere else)?
Not sure, but I’m pretty invested into RF and for the most part the equipment has been bulletproof for my system basically running my tank.
This was posted on the RF Facebook page

IMG_6661.jpeg
 
Last edited:

vabben

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
496
Reaction score
623
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Unfortunately it’s not looking good if you own anything Reef Factory, and will need warranty support. They are unable to provide me with a new float sensor on a new unit that has failed.

IMG_3288.jpeg
 

KStatefan

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
5,593
Reaction score
5,018
Location
MHK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This is not good for people that bought into that system. I know that the post above said that the distributors are paying the server cost but I would be concerned how long term that could be sustained.
 

BeanAnimal

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
9,417
Reaction score
15,772
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Here's an update

Screenshot_20250507-133339.png

This is wholly unsustainable... and I would venture to say part of the reason they they went belly up.


I would posit that a fraction of a fraction of you realize what "cloud services" cost. These are hosted servers and bandwidth. They must have security, they must be maintained. They must have backups and they must maintain updates. They cost per hour, 24/7 365. Very basic recurring costs can easily be $20K to $200K per month.

Something has to PAY for these services. The business is a self inflicted pyramid scheme for most vendors who are not charging subscription fees. FULL STOP.

1 - customer buys an IoT device. This is a "durable good". A "one time" profitable sale. Say 30% margin. So the $500 retail controller nets them $150 in profit.

2 - customer starts consuming "cloud services". Each customer adds bandwidth, processor and storage load to the "hosted services". For each day that the customer "subscribes" the $150 profit is eroded paying for their portion of the "cloud".

3 - because there are no "subscription" fees, the vendor must rely on sales of consumables or complimentary items to remain in black ink. But not all cloud devices use consumables and not all customers are willing to pay for them indefinately.

4 - if vendor has no reliable method to dynamically scale their cloud consumption, the issues are amplified, but such dynamic scaling is also costly and complicated.

We could go on... but you get the picture.....


If you buy a device that is "cloud" reliant for functionality, it is has a very high likelihood of becoming a paperweight long before it is obsolete. Why? Most companies building around this paradigm in niche markets like this have insanely poor business plans and insanely overestimate sales revenue while insanely underestimating the albatross of hosting costs for "cloud services" and everything that comes along with them.

My advice -- run from products like this... run as fast as you can.
 

Gribbles

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 10, 2022
Messages
582
Reaction score
456
Location
Cypress
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
This is wholly unsustainable... and I would venture to say part of the reason they they went belly up.


I would posit that a fraction of a fraction of you realize what "cloud services" cost. These are hosted servers and bandwidth. They must have security, they must be maintained. They must have backups and they must maintain updates. They cost per hour, 24/7 365. Very basic recurring costs can easily be $20K to $200K per month.

Something has to PAY for these services. The business is a self inflicted pyramid scheme for most vendors who are not charging subscription fees. FULL STOP.

1 - customer buys an IoT device. This is a "durable good". A "one time" profitable sale. Say 30% margin. So the $500 retail controller nets them $150 in profit.

2 - customer starts consuming "cloud services". Each customer adds bandwidth, processor and storage load to the "hosted services". For each day that the customer "subscribes" the $150 profit is eroded paying for their portion of the "cloud".

3 - because there are no "subscription" fees, the vendor must rely on sales of consumables or complimentary items to remain in black ink. But not all cloud devices use consumables and not all customers are willing to pay for them indefinately.

4 - if vendor has no reliable method to dynamically scale their cloud consumption, the issues are amplified, but such dynamic scaling is also costly and complicated.

We could go on... but you get the picture.....


If you buy a device that is "cloud" reliant for functionality, it is has a very high likelihood of becoming a paperweight long before it is obsolete. Why? Most companies building around this paradigm in niche markets like this have insanely poor business plans and insanely overestimate sales revenue while insanely underestimating the albatross of hosting costs for "cloud services" and everything that comes along with them.

My advice -- run from products like this... run as fast as you can.
Fyi to everyone who reads this in the future, these numbers are just made up and guesses
 

BeanAnimal

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
9,417
Reaction score
15,772
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Fyi to everyone who reads this in the future, these numbers are just made up and guesses
Yes - the numbers are made up and guesses!

The point was broader with regard to the reality of having a device the can't be used without its cloud services.

It is very nice that distributors have decided to foot the bill. I don't see it as sustainable long term (for many reasons) but maybe they will prove me wrong.


That said, part of what I do for a living is size, spin up and manage "cloud" computing instances.
Application Servers,
Load Balancers,
Database Servers,
Storage,
Data Pipelines,
API gateways,
etc.

As I said, there is a lot more involved, long term, than just the hour compute and storage costs.

I wish all of the RF customers good luck and hope thins work out, as the situation is very unfortunate, but something I think we are going to see more of as we move forward in this hobby.
 

Create New

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
174
Reaction score
181
Location
Adelaide
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Not gonna lie I've always been a reef factory hater, all they do is put a lick of paint on a jebao products and sell it for 10x the price. same with a lot of the other products they have such as the smart power switch x4... just google it and you can get the exact same thing off amazon for $20 instead of $200 lol
 

Billyreef-ita

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2024
Messages
220
Reaction score
73
Location
Rome
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I wonder if there’s a company interested in buying them to keep operations ongoing. There are few companies active in the reefing automation and Reef Factory certainly has developed a certain expertise in the sector. This could be the only solution, I guess.
Any rumors on this?
 

sd_tom

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 2, 2024
Messages
67
Reaction score
20
Location
San Diego
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Their app is a lot nicer than jebao though, that is the value add. And also the downfall cause it needs a cloud. I have two of the pro x1 dosing pumps and I have the smartroller medium still sitting in box for a new build.. the smartroller I picked for it being the best combination of features for my needs (footprint, etc).. vs the dosing pumps I just got for cost reasons and that they did dosing down to 0.1ml / nano tank.

The smart roller does seem reef factory specific / not just relabeled. If that's not true definitely interested in a link in case I need to substitute after all this
 

shadyraro

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 21, 2022
Messages
604
Reaction score
375
Location
Sydney
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I wonder if there’s a company interested in buying them to keep operations ongoing. There are few companies active in the reefing automation and Reef Factory certainly has developed a certain expertise in the sector. This could be the only solution, I guess.
Any rumors on this?
The owner of my LFS said he’s heard Aquaforest is very keen on buying out reef factory.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HOW DO YOU ADJUST YOUR CUC AS ALGAE DISAPPEARS?

  • Capture and re-home CUC

    Votes: 6 7.2%
  • Increase white light/hours in tank to spur algae growth to feed CUC

    Votes: 5 6.0%
  • Feed nori to support CUC

    Votes: 30 36.1%
  • Feed herbivore pellets to support CUC

    Votes: 26 31.3%
  • Allow attrition to balance CUC and algae

    Votes: 38 45.8%
  • Provide macro algae to feed CUC

    Votes: 6 7.2%
  • Introduce CUC predators

    Votes: 1 1.2%
  • Other (please explain)

    Votes: 7 8.4%
Back
Top