Reefers Moonshine Method - Let's discuss

Status
Not open for further replies.

Saltyreef

I'm not your dad...
View Badges
Joined
Nov 25, 2018
Messages
7,225
Reaction score
5,865
Location
Central Coast, California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So what? Budget $600/yr in ICP tests?
Yes initial costs a bit higher but ive wasted a lot more money chasing other things not knowing what may actually be wrong....
Once you get the hang of things you may only need to send one in every couple months.

I think i have the same amount invested in hanna checkers.....
 

Saltyreef

I'm not your dad...
View Badges
Joined
Nov 25, 2018
Messages
7,225
Reaction score
5,865
Location
Central Coast, California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The reason I use Kent marine is the cheapest Ive found so far lol, I’d use all for reef if it wasn’t so expensive
Totally.
I use the BRS hybrid balling method but i use DIY solution where i can to save money LOL.

Arm and hammer is just so much darn cheaper than USP grade from BRS hahaha.
 

mindme

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 30, 2020
Messages
1,145
Reaction score
1,192
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I keep seeing references to the
Reefers Moonshine Method.

I think.... I know what it is but want to hear everyone's input on this word-of-mouth movement. Another rendering fad??

Explain to everyone what it is like we're brand new to it


.

I'm planning on switching over to it soon. I do not do water changes on my 180g tank. I learned about lacking trace minerals the hard way - my corals started to fade away/die without them. From the way people talked, I didn't expect them to deplete so quickly.

I am currently using the BRS tri-balling method. Where I add the trace parts into my calcium and soda ash, and also dose the part C. This is working for me currently, however I don't see how I can just blindly dose trace elements forever and it be ok. When I do my ICP tests, some trace minerals are obviously getting used more than others, but my dosing just doses them all. A build up has to occur at some point without hefty water changes.

So I plan to switch to this method so that I can address my tanks specific trace mineral needs.
 

muzikalmatt

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
1,263
Reaction score
2,460
Location
Roanoke, VA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So what? Budget $600/yr in ICP tests?
As I mentioned in my earlier post, most people dial back the frequency of their ICP testing once they get a sense of the consumption rates for their tank.

Did you actually want to discuss the moonshiners method or were you just looking for an excuse to belittle and talk down to people that use it? I mean it's fine if you disagree with the method or think it's overkill, but there's no need to be purposefully disingenuous.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,879
Reaction score
93,557
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Maybe I'm confused but isn't the moonshiners method the same as the triton method but with slight variation?

Yes, my understanding is that both are based on the very good premise of dosing exactly what is needed. It is part of my "dream method".

The complications are:

1. knowing what is in the water (ICP is not perfect in this regard as it ignores chemical form, and may or may not be accurate). The need to know also varies with time. If I dose Mn, how long is it adequately bioavailable? Hours? Days? Weeks?
2. Knowing what concentration of what chemical is actually required and/or optimal in the water
3. Knowing what to do about elements that are too high
 

mindme

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 30, 2020
Messages
1,145
Reaction score
1,192
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So what? Budget $600/yr in ICP tests?

I think when it comes to costs, the size of the aquarium is a big deal. I wouldn't use this method on my 29g anemone tank. You can just do water changes cheaply. 5 gallons every 2 weeks. Although I do a water change about once every 3-4 months, as it's just anemones and pulsating xenias with 2 clownfish. All those extra elements aren't really needed by the anemone.

However, when it comes to my 180g tank, that's 40 gallons of water change every 2 weeks. 80 gallons of water a month, and now you are looking at salt costs, plus the costs of making the RODI water. That right there is $30-$35 a month, and making all that water is kind of a pain in the butt. Oh, and it messes with my macro values unless you keep them exactly the same as your salt.

And yet the only reason to do it - to replace trace minerals. I have a refugium for nutrient export. I dose alk, calcium and magnesium. The only thing left is replacing trace minerals.

ICP test is pretty much the same as the cost of water change at this water volume. For people with even bigger tanks, it because a financial advantage.

Of course, still gotta pay for the trace minerals to dose, so a little more expensive. But much less time involved and as they say - time is money.
 

Utubereefer

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
17,087
Reaction score
38,863
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Id rather put a few drops of potion here and there and call it a day.
No water changes are awesome.
No water changes gets detritus piling up in your sump. Ticking time bomb
 

Utubereefer

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
17,087
Reaction score
38,863
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As I mentioned in my earlier post, most people dial back the frequency of their ICP testing once they get a sense of the consumption rates for their tank.

Did you actually want to discuss the moonshiners method or were you just looking for an excuse to belittle and talk down to people that use it? I mean it's fine if you disagree with the method or think it's overkill, but there's no need to be purposefully disingenuous.
I don’t think he’s being disingenuous. He’s just trying to understand. It is very different.
 
OP
OP
ZoWhat

ZoWhat

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
10,367
Reaction score
17,402
Location
Cincinnati Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think when it comes to costs, the size of the aquarium is a big deal. I wouldn't use this method on my 29g anemone tank. You can just do water changes cheaply. 5 gallons every 2 weeks. Although I do a water change about once every 3-4 months, as it's just anemones and pulsating xenias with 2 clownfish. All those extra elements aren't really needed by the anemone.

However, when it comes to my 180g tank, that's 40 gallons of water change every 2 weeks. 80 gallons of water a month, and now you are looking at salt costs, plus the costs of making the RODI water. That right there is $30-$35 a month, and making all that water is kind of a pain in the butt. Oh, and it messes with my macro values unless you keep them exactly the same as your salt.

And yet the only reason to do it - to replace trace minerals. I have a refugium for nutrient export. I dose alk, calcium and magnesium. The only thing left is replacing trace minerals.

ICP test is pretty much the same as the cost of water change at this water volume. For people with even bigger tanks, it because a financial advantage.

Of course, still gotta pay for the trace minerals to dose, so a little more expensive. But much less time involved and as they say - time is money.
This is an open discussion

Now I have my opinions, blunt ones mind you.... but I'm not here to say dosing with no waterchanges is wrong.

You can dose banana smoothies along side hydrochloric acid, for all I care.

Me personally I can't wrap my head around paying $600+ a year for ICP testing THEN the cost of dosing on top of that.

It's a well known fact that Tropic Marin uses pharmaceutical grade elements in their salt mix.

I personally would take the $1000 I'm spending on ICP test + dosing (to avoid the manual labor of WCs) ...and buy TM salt

But that's just me.

Y'all do what y'all do.

.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mindme

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 30, 2020
Messages
1,145
Reaction score
1,192
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No water changes gets detritus piling up in your sump. Ticking time bomb

You can clean stuff out without removing water.

I do add a little salt about once every other month because I have 6 socks in my sump, and when I swap them out I lose a little bit of water.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,879
Reaction score
93,557
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm planning on switching over to it soon. I do not do water changes on my 180g tank. I learned about lacking trace minerals the hard way - my corals started to fade away/die without them. From the way people talked, I didn't expect them to deplete so quickly.

A few grams of macroalgae growth will entirely deplete a 100 gallon tank of manganese. Thus, the tediousness of dosing to match ICP, because you may need to measure every day for a while.
 

Utubereefer

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
17,087
Reaction score
38,863
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I dont have this issue. I siphon detritus back thru filter socks and skim the remaining :)
I do this occasionally. But I also prefer water changes for salinity management. To each their own
 

Utubereefer

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
17,087
Reaction score
38,863
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You can clean stuff out without removing water.

I do add a little salt about once every other month because I have 6 socks in my sump, and when I swap them out I lose a little bit of water.
6 socks?!? That seems like a lot of work
 

Saltyreef

I'm not your dad...
View Badges
Joined
Nov 25, 2018
Messages
7,225
Reaction score
5,865
Location
Central Coast, California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Can anyone find any threads with any negatives?
Just wondering why all the bashing....

If what youre doing works.....great.....
Move on!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Saltyreef

I'm not your dad...
View Badges
Joined
Nov 25, 2018
Messages
7,225
Reaction score
5,865
Location
Central Coast, California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
And you said you don’t use it
I did say that. I also said i plan to do it soon.

Its a quality program and i havent seen any negatives.
$600 on ICP tests isnt a negative.
People spend more on coral they kill shortly after anyways....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 40 40.4%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 4 4.0%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 37 37.4%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 33 33.3%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new