Jose, I understand that I can reasonably assume that your "gullible angels" slight was directed at me ( & probably Lasse) going by your posts from #209, where you refered to me, rudely, as "dear", & created a strawman argument to boot.Steve, Steve ... I was responding to the expression: "to make that interpretationit from Tritons claim will give the same result as we get when the devil reading the bible." (Lasse)
You understand?
Regards
Lasse' rebuke of your strawman statement in post #211 was spot on.
You can interpret the word "useful" however you like.
I interpret the word "useful" as its meant to be understood - able to be used for a practical purpose or in several ways
And I've made my opinions on the use of the word quite clear in post #121, 124, 129, 131 & 135