Awc not effective?

Notsolostfish

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
2,426
Reaction score
704
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Im doing 5G 6 days a week water change with neptune dos. Before i used to do one 30G a month for 150G. But i figured it will be easier to do 1 5G a day for 6 days. And then repeat that every 30 days.. but now thinking about it its not effective as one big 30?
 

Waters

"...in perfect isolation, here behind my wall."
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
8,671
Reaction score
19,416
Location
Mentor, OH
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Im doing 5G 6 days a week water change with neptune dos. Before i used to do one 30G a month for 150G. But i figured it will be easier to do 1 5G a day for 6 days. And then repeat that every 30 days.. but now thinking about it its not effective as one big 30?
Why do you think it isn't as effective? It keeps the water parameters much more stable doing smaller more frequent water changes. You might not notice a big reaction from coral compared to doing a large one time change that you sometimes see but that is only because the smaller frequent changes keeps them in higher water quality all the time opposed to right after changing a bunch of water out at once. Now if you are doing a large change to remove a toxin or something, then yes, the larger change would be beneficial.
 

Miami Reef

Clam Fanatic
View Badges
Joined
Sep 8, 2017
Messages
13,637
Reaction score
25,531
Location
Miami
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
But i figured it will be easier to do 1 5G a day for 6 days. And then repeat that every 30 days.. but now thinking about it its not effective as one big 30?
Mathematically speaking, you are correct. One larger change would have a bigger impact than several smaller ones because the smaller ones would also be changing some new water.

 
OP
OP
Notsolostfish

Notsolostfish

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
2,426
Reaction score
704
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Mathematically speaking, you are correct. One larger change would have a bigger impact than several smaller ones because the smaller ones would also be changing some new water.

So should i forget about it u think?
 

Miami Reef

Clam Fanatic
View Badges
Joined
Sep 8, 2017
Messages
13,637
Reaction score
25,531
Location
Miami
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So should i forget about it u think?
Depends on your goals. Loads of people use AWC because it’s convenient and gradual.

I personally wouldn’t, but that’s just my preference and reefing style.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
77,812
Reaction score
77,362
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The difference is small, and IMO, more slower water changes can be better for many reasons including less stress on organisms from changes and no need to heat or otherwise match the new salt water to the tank (if, say, you want to adjust salinity or calcium or whatever).

6 x 5 gallon changes is identical to one 26.5% change.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HOW WELL IS YOUR MOST EXPENSIVE REEF INHABITANT DOING RIGHT NOW?

  • It's doing excellent - It appears healthy and has grown exponentially!

    Votes: 20 20.6%
  • It's doing great - It appears healthy and has grown some!

    Votes: 20 20.6%
  • It's doing good - Although it hasn't grown yet, it appears healthy!

    Votes: 24 24.7%
  • It's doing okay - It isn't growing, and it seems a little stressed, but I'm sure it'll recover.

    Votes: 5 5.2%
  • It's not doing good - It isn't growing, it seems very stressed, and I'm not sure it'll recover.

    Votes: 1 1.0%
  • It's doing bad - Sadly, it looks like it is dying and I do not expect it to recover.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Unfortunately, I already lost it...

    Votes: 25 25.8%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 2 2.1%
Back
Top