The regent cost and service down the line is peanuts in comparison to the money we spend on corals and livestock. Having a device the closely monitors my parameters that helps me achieve super stable numbers is perfect for me.
Others may choose to run old fashion test kits, and that is just fine.
I see the value of the Trident and it’s inherent costs.
I was also lucky enough to be testing it for last 100 + days. I can assure you, it’s a terrific product and well worth the time and investment.
I agree with the sum of your post, the pricing and such can be considered peanuts for some that have had a lot of SPS losses, or house a tank with thousands in rather delicate acropora / montis. The retail guys as well, this will be on their systems asap if it isn't already. There's also no discounting that it works, it tests dKH (and Ca/Mg) with what seems excellent precision and can interface with the DOS for tight control. Usability wise it also seems simple, both in operation and in reagent replenishment. Availability of reagent from non-Neptune direct will be something to see going forward, as will the non-US distribution (I genuinely worry about Canadaland with this release), but overall this unit is plus plus plus by those metrics, it's a great release.
However, I will post more on this regardless of what just hit my PM box because it does need to be said again.
What is not good in my opinion is more along the lines of the general air of attitude that's surrounded this whole development release. Other market solutions are put down for requiring PH probe replacement, or syringe replacement, or requiring probe calibration regularly, etc. Summed up, because all the various solutions hardware needs to be serviced in one form or another to maintain operation, something never once brought up in regards to the Trident. We now know the reason is it was put behind the NDA, and I don't seem to recall a single leak regarding this.
So after a year plus of development, plus months of extensive 'in the wild' via NSI, out of nowhere this past Friday we see an unintentional release / mention of a servicing requirement in the unboxing video from the fusion setup task. Given it shouldn't have been disclosed, the information was quickly yanked once posted about and ultimately the thread closed as everyone started going nuts trying to get an answer about this new twist to the release and arguing with each-other. Today there was a few minutes of mention in that stream, other than that nothing. That's a pretty big part of ownership to dedicate a few minutes to, the afternoon before release, in a single medium, that was never once mentioned in product marketing, after two years of development, at least I think.
Personally I'm still on the fence as to what the right solution is, as I am heavily investing into SPS, but my market is somewhat unique as the border really sucks. The DIY ability of maintenance is not my gripe, neither is the ~$100 cost. It's solely attitude, this is a market solution that has an aspect of ownership that requires intervention, just like all the others. It's not above all, whatever tag you wish to apply to it. It's another in a growing number of solutions to help our tanks be the best they can be for coral health and growth, and I wish it had remained simply that through this whole journey by all, be they employees, backers, industry insiders and the general reefing public, including myself. I'm excited for a guy locally that I know will be trying to get one asap, it should make his reefing life so much easier, and I couldn't think of a better person to get some help than he.
At least the day is here, and I am very much fingers crossed that this release goes as flawlessly as possible. The coming months will show us how things will ultimately play out, and perhaps some lessons can be learned by all. Kudos for those that have had a hand in bringing this to market.