very fun exercise on personal bias in the cycling hobby
anyone reading, go to google and put in ' stuck reef tank cycle '
go to page two hundred thousand that way hopefully I'm not tainting the thread with my opinions lol and just look at what the reefer is posting in succession along with all peers
rule #1 you see in the patterns: always a non digital test kit causing the alarm, not an actual tank issue. not the inability to carry fish, its because a cheap test kit reads between .25 and .5 ppm ammonia/that freaks out the poster and the umpires follow suit even though the tank is fine for four hundred thousand pages.
*while searching, try and fine one single instance of a full crash upon cycling with bottle bac, a full reef crash from no ammonia control, and post that link here when you find it.
the collective data we can all equally search to draw a conclusion is so resoundingly positive it will begin to shock you when you read about people doubting cycles in today's posts, where bottle bac is even more potent and better than 2011
notice that all old cycling proponents create a consequence/your tank won't carry fish/your tank might crash / and we can't even find one example among four hundred thousand
basic google searching, even though that's the bane of any reputable scientist, easily tells us your cycle is going to be fine once you add some life. we can read above in Dr. Reef's study that
fritz is the fastest-plating bac along with biospira for eight bucks a bottle.
we also know nowadays that reefs aren't expected to run zero ammonia when stocked, that too was old rules. they're likely to show some low level nh4 in the expected range of .25-.5
problem solved using basic and free web patterning.