Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And what Walt has built and established is a detriment to the environment how?Sorry I'm not used to the guilt free reefers in my country but our hobby is not meant to be at the expense of the environment but more for the benefit of the environment
I think that one thing that everyone can agree on is that this was a major slap in the face to Walt Smith International. They are among the most established, respected, and responsible companies in this industry and they weren't even consulted, at all.
This is a shame... No Cites means no corals, mariculture or wild.
+1 I'm all for management but it seems like private industry was doing a great job in this instance. I doubt the government there will be able to invest as much in terms of resources.What saddens me is the fact that this wasn't phased in and people who survive on the industry there had this thrown in their lap. My heart goes out to the local Fijians who were blind sided and lost their jobs. Getting to know many of those involved at WSI when I was last in Fiji makes it a little more personal I guess, the people at WSI genuinely care about their reefs and are good people, they aren't some evil group smashing the reefs up with hammers for profit. It's sad to see one of the best models for sustainable collection targeted and not even consulted when making such a huge decision.
Myself and the industry will survive without Fiji corals, my best guess is that Australia is next and others will follow suit.
Sad to see all of this. I feel bad for Walt Smith and his employees right now.Sarcasm soapbox moment warning. With all of the big industry that is involved in any way shape or form with the ocean, with all the pollution caused by these industries, etc etc....but...it's the aquarium industry that we have to watch out for...give me a break. I'm sorry but in this instance, there's really no solid footing for any kind of "saving the environment" argument.
Take a large coral mother colony for instance - a large part of that will be skeleton. Now break that up into 1000 pieces and put 100 back in the ocean such that it forms 100 new colonies. Those colonies will grow faster than the mother colony they came from. That's a vast oversimplification I'm sure but essentially that's what sustainable reefing is.
Fiji is doing more harm by not allowing sustainable collection by companies like WSI. This is akin to now allowing clearing of dead growth from a forest because of the desire to have some wilderness that is untouched. Then a forest fire comes through and wipes it all out because of all that fuel there...again, not a direct comparison, but I'm sure there is a similar one.
/soapbox
Sarcasm is still engaged however.
Um...yes it does - the Prime Minister in Fiji is on the forefront of that precise issue and apparently sees reefkeeping as a threatThis has nothing to do with climate change or pollution
So this recent move could be taken to be highly hypocritical considering that WSI is about the only company that harvests from the reefs in Fiji, there's no other company or companies that are "running rampant" and destroying reefs via collection, and WSI (as has been mentioned already many times in this thread) is a model for sustainable reefkeeping = sustainable development. This, at a time when it is actually probably needed the most after cyclone Winston which undoubtedly wiped out sections of coral reefs, and I'd bet money that those sections that were wiped out were re-seeded with frags from WSI. Who wants to take me up on that bet.Fiji has a Green Growth Plan and has aggressively pursued and implemented policies to promote sustainable development in the country, all while partnering with the private sector and international organisations to elevate the issue on the global stage.
This is very unfortunate. Counterproductive and very poorly implemented by the gov't.
This is a shame... No Cites means no corals, mariculture or wild.