Help hard plumbing

Fish Fan

Master of Disaster
View Badges
Joined
Dec 8, 2017
Messages
13,132
Reaction score
34,193
Location
461 Ocean Boulevard
Rating - 100%
6   0   0
If it's helpful, BRS investigated whether 90 degree elbows really restrict water flow, and they determined that using 90's didn't restrict flow nearly as much as is often stated:


I hope this helps!
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
15,217
Reaction score
8,978
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Im confused again, wouldnt the link I provided reasonably contradict your statement that the 90s would provide negligible head loss? The link I provide (and see on numerous other hobbyist sites) indicate that a 90 would create a 1 foot head pressure loss. With the amount of 90s OP is using, that would account for notable loss in comparing to the pumps flow curve. I do understand completely why smaller pipe reduces flow, stiction, turbulence, etc. Why is why im rather shocked the calculator you linked indicates a minimal or even negligible reduction in flow for what would be a significant introduction of restriction by those forces in several 90s. What am I misunderstanding?
...it may be true that a 90° fitting puts a foot of length onto the total plumbing length (which does compute into head pressure) but it does not add a foot onto head pressure directly.
 
Last edited:

KStatefan

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
5,595
Reaction score
5,020
Location
MHK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Im confused again, wouldnt the link I provided reasonably contradict your statement that the 90s would provide negligible head loss? The link I provide (and see on numerous other hobbyist sites) indicate that a 90 would create a 1 foot head pressure loss. With the amount of 90s OP is using, that would account for notable loss in comparing to the pumps flow curve. I do understand completely why smaller pipe reduces flow, stiction, turbulence, etc. Why is why im rather shocked the calculator you linked indicates a minimal or even negligible reduction in flow for what would be a significant introduction of restriction by those forces in several 90s. What am I misunderstanding?

This from your link "Roughly every 10 feet of pipe (horizontal & vertical) through which water is traveling adds 1 foot of head pressure. Additionally, every 90-degree bend adds 1 foot of head pressure. " is not correct.

The head loss is dependent on the velocity of the fluid.

500 GPH thru a 1/2" 90° fitting will create approximately 0.41 feet of headloss but thru a 1" fitting only 0.1 feet.
 
Last edited:

jmaneyapanda

.
View Badges
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
184
Reaction score
85
Location
Decatur, GA
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
If it's helpful, BRS investigated whether 90 degree elbows really restrict water flow, and they determined that using 90's didn't restrict flow nearly as much as is often stated:


I hope this helps!

I did watch that, but it more shows theres no difference between 45s and 90s. However it did for teh most part show that 90s create a flow loss/loss of head pressure.
 

jmaneyapanda

.
View Badges
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
184
Reaction score
85
Location
Decatur, GA
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
...it may be true that a 90° fitting puts a foot of length onto the total plumbing length (which does compute into head pressure) but it does not add a foot onto head pressure directly.
OK, so the link I posted from ETM is wrong youre saying. They state: "Additionally, every 90-degree bend adds 1 foot of head pressure." Thats incorrect?
 

jmaneyapanda

.
View Badges
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
184
Reaction score
85
Location
Decatur, GA
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
This from your link "Roughly every 10 feet of pipe (horizontal & vertical) through which water is traveling adds 1 foot of head pressure. Additionally, every 90-degree bend adds 1 foot of head pressure. " is not correct.

The head loss is dependent on the velocity of the fluid.

500 GPH thru a 1/2" 90° fitting will create approximately 0.41 feet of headloss but thru a 1" fitting only 0.1 feet.
Are you using the previously linked formulary to detrmine that?
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
15,217
Reaction score
8,978
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Very cool...somehow I didn't even know pentair had a calc ("thanks" a lot, Google!).

It seems to be good and more or less in agreement with the calc I posted earlier, but I think I still like this a bit more for calculating friction losses: (https://inventory.powerzone.com/resources/friction-loss-calculator/)

It's simple to use like the Pentair calc and mostly asks for the same data. It has a little more visualization for what that's worth. It's interesting IMO that it reports results from three different friction loss equations for comparison in addition to reporting flow velocity.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HOW DO YOU ADJUST YOUR CUC AS ALGAE DISAPPEARS?

  • Capture and re-home CUC

    Votes: 10 8.3%
  • Increase white light/hours in tank to spur algae growth to feed CUC

    Votes: 8 6.6%
  • Feed nori to support CUC

    Votes: 39 32.2%
  • Feed herbivore pellets to support CUC

    Votes: 43 35.5%
  • Allow attrition to balance CUC and algae

    Votes: 52 43.0%
  • Provide macro algae to feed CUC

    Votes: 8 6.6%
  • Introduce CUC predators

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • Other (please explain)

    Votes: 12 9.9%
Back
Top