Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly.To represent that graphically
On the pictured example no.Or, put two of them higher?
That becomes a question of dimensions.Wouldn't two higher give more light bouncing around just as it does with one?
Honestly, begin by drawing these concepts on paper.Oh that makes sense. There is an optimal ppint in each set up and it varies with dimension spread etc.
How do we find this point in a real world application?
I'm a simpleton. What can I say.Set it on the floor. ..what a great idea. The great ideas are always so simple...
I'm off to take down my lights lol.
This has been the most helpful thread i have read on this confusing subject
Thanks to all who shared!
Hahaha !Simpleton, I don't think so but you are certainly illuminating!
To represent that graphically
Yup. That's also why I opted for the 3 bb on the canopoy. Best coverage possible , and I can still see the TV.yeah thats pretty much my take exactly. the only complaint I can come up with for higher fixture, is bleed over, in fact I absolutely hate it myself, but I'm still a "hood" guy just for the reason. I really like the discussion and input here,guys
yeah thats pretty much my take exactly. the only complaint I can come up with for higher fixture, is bleed over, in fact I absolutely hate it myself, but I'm still a "hood" guy just for the reason. I really like the discussion and input here,guys
To represent that graphically
I've done a lot of those....beggars can't be choosers – those diagrams take time to make. Level of complexity is reflected in the cost!
Here's maybe the best one I've made that shows proportional reflections....it's a modelled Kessil:
One showing "too high" resulting in spill and loss of internal reflections:
And one showing a more ideal mouting height with no spill (this one shows above- and side-veiws):